sai baba? i hope you're joking...
you need to read all the articles on the website, including "highly popular
spiritual figure exposed as negative." too many people have spoken out about
him for them to be silenced any longer, and what they say dovetails
precisely with the available knowledge on these types of practices, as i
wrote.
seth two does seem to be more akin to a 6d source. overall i see seth's
prophecies for the 21st century as giving a timeline for how long
reconstruction will take after ascension.
peace be with you -
- david
----- original message -----
from: tiffani boswell
to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=8gocpumseiaofk5c1aogkgtzhbkldyp8stbjvd _ztef6iics5-g__rthld5abugpz4gacm0rkbbunust6ich)
sent: tuesday, january 29, 2002 3:30 pm
subject: re: [asc2k] core beliefs-seth
i have a question...i know we look more at the ra material here...but i am
reading the seth speaks at the same time...
he alludes to someone having been born in india (before 1974) and then an
african american that would be born after 1974...that would be lower key and
have the same "jesus" type...and that the whole 2nd coming would be
completed by 2075. in the sense of the "third" personality of christ
returning...(don't know much about this)
i was wondering if sai baba was really know then...and if maybe that would
be who the indian is.
also...when seth two comes through and briefly speaks and the way seth tries
later to simplify who it was...after reading ra has anyone else thought that
seth two seems especially using "we" when seth two speaks, seems to be a
merged group like ra.
?
----- original message -----
from: "karena83540" <difrt@... (/group/asc2k/post?postid=wl-1y7s_2xj60h9-ypitpr3_yaeoz9yx4wcsnkmwzuepkndjhskvf-rtnuaixtgvtkfm)>
to: <asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=8gocpumseiaofk5c1aogkgtzhbkldyp8stbjvd _ztef6iics5-g__rthld5abugpz4gacm0rkbbunust6ich)>
sent: january 28, 2002 10:20 am
subject: [asc2k] core beliefs-seth
> dear david and group,
> after reading and refering to "seth speaks" for a couple of
> years now, i recently picked up "the nature of personal reality.
> it was written by jane after "speaks".
> the whole book deals with the fact that our core beliefs feed
> our perception which produces our thoughts/ideas which manifests
> into our reality. is it not true, therefore, that our core beliefs
> regarding ascension/transformation will follow the same natural
> law? what are the implications of this if it is true? what do we
> know so far that can be our core?
>
> karen
>
>
>
>
> to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=a9soz_gj8un3ublekwcsaa-atjrgbyttf_s7eyfxptauejghqcvt9kjxly5jchvo1ujq_xup4 zwrsfezykutmne5cg)
>
>
>
> your use of yahoo! groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
yahoo! groups sponsor
to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=a9soz_gj8un3ublekwcsaa-atjrgbyttf_s7eyfxptauejghqcvt9kjxly5jchvo1ujq_xup4 zwrsfezykutmne5cg)
your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service.