PDA

View Full Version : asc2k] Re: on being false to oneself


bob_dunham
01-16-2006, 08:26 PM
Axxiss, I have to admit, your "lurker" coming out of the shadows post was one of
the most
passionate defenses Ive ever seen. Its almost like you a have a man crush on
Drake or
something.

Its just odd that you rarely post, yet here you are with this long passionate
defense of
someone you dont even know. You go on to tell us what a great scholar he is and
that you
have read all of his posts to the point that you are intimately familiar with
them. You even
think he knows just as much as David.

I am suggesting that your account be flagged as it is obvious that you ARE
Drake. You are
Drake using another email address to defend your self and it is very obvious. I
suggest
Chris call the phone number you provided for this account to verify your true
identity.
That way Drake can stop playing these deceitful games.

Oh yea, also tell us more about all these "fine gentelmen" that are on the board
of
directors of all the fortune 500 companies you speak of. Also tell us more
about this
Focus that you capitalize when you speak of it. Tell us what we can accomplish
when we
Focus in on attaining power and wealth. Id love to hear it.


--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=isgU0IdADao35faK47R1JGAUyiNLxRipiZbkBn prsCQUfswq1YXxRHTnPcAkwOQQuJ0RV_gSkQ_RIEM), aaaxxxisss <qquantumm@y...> wrote:
. It has been my personal
> experience that many of these fine gentlemen sitting
> on boards have all demonstrated an ability to Focus in
> any chosen path they narrow their gaze to. It strikes
> me that Drake has chosen a higher Focus to the
> Material clearly demonstrated.
>
>
> Will I be accused now of having banded together as
> well for writing? For the record, I have never once
> communicated with anyone on the list. Listen to us
> speaking of lists? Sound familiar? Frankly, I feel
> were Drake to become discouraged, as much as if David
> were to, that the asc2k would loose much. David and
> Drake add greatly to knowledge. Both should be
> encouraged to continue. I hope that Drake reads this
> and takes heart that there are more than a few that
> see his academia and command of the information and
> that it is valued and well received, as is Davids.
> Only an LO1 scholar has the ability to write and
> question with the fluency and degree he has on the
> subjects he chooses. I have found him to be a
> wonderful stimulus to thought provoking commentary,
> and one that narrows his arguments with great care to
> the material with concise clear and definitive thought
> process. I am a lurker come out of hiding to add to
> Monicas lone bravery in defense of a wonderful spirit
> and contributor and encourage others to speak truth as
> well. It is my sincere and humble opinion that
> contibuting and offering different views, opinions and
> questions, will prepare us more for the coming
> changes, not the the belief that joining a club will
> get us there.
>
> L/L
>
> Axis
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>

Michael Abrient
01-16-2006, 09:31 PM
>
> I am suggesting that your account be flagged as it is obvious that you ARE
> Drake.


Good call, dude. I second the motion.

It sounds just like him, too. Besides, if I got banned, there wouldn't be
much to stop me here from making another account, supply some bogus
information, and get right back on the list and try again. It would be the
first thing. I wondered how long it would take.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Dana
01-17-2006, 07:32 AM
--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=cl5eAZAvDajuH2QloDO4x_PYDQtrJMGZsay8d1 7WzNupk8RTJMnABr7ruFgaMkfDt8wCLYunekCkKlf5AOo), Michael Abrient <abrient@g...> wrote:
>
> >
> > I am suggesting that your account be flagged as it is obvious that
you ARE
> > Drake.
>
>
> Good call, dude. I second the motion.
>

It's very obvious that Axis is actually Drake. Perhaps the easiest
thing to do in this case is just ignor "them" completely...