Defining Emotional Balance

[Light Eye]

Dear Friends,

It's all about balance...

http://www.meta-religion.com/Spiritualism/New_age/defining_emotional_balance.htm

Be Well, Be Love.

David

Defining emotional balanceSource: THE RA MATERIAL/THE LAW OF ONE series
(http://www.llresearch.org/)
QUESTIONER: Is it correct that a balanced entity would not be swayed towards
either positive or negative emotions, and would remain unemotional in any
situation he might confront?



RA: This is an incorrect application of the balancing method that we discussed
[the training of mind]. The goal of the exercise we gave you -- first
experiencing your feelings, then consciously discovering their polarity in the
mind -- is not to experience a smooth flow of feelings both positive and
negative while remaining unswayed. Rather, the goal is to achieve a
[non-emotional] condition of always being unswayed. This is a simpler result,
although it does take much practice.



The catalyst of life-experience works in order for the learning of 3rd density
[and every density]. However, if a being has some form of emotional response,
even if it is only observed [and not acted upon], the entity is still using the
3D catalyst for learning. After a long period of learning, the end result is
that the catalyst is no longer needed.



At this stage of development, the entire density is no longer needed [for that
soul]. This [balanced condition] is not indifference or objectivity, but rather,
a finely tuned compassion and love which sees all things as love. Seeing "all
things as love" elicits no emotional response due to life-catalyst. Thus, the
entity is now able to become a co-Creator of their experiences. This is a truer
balance [than trying to be unswayed by the normal flow of emotions]. {v. II}



BALANCE AND PERSONAL ATTACK



QUESTIONER: So for a person who is truly balanced, if an animal or person
attacks them, they would not have an emotional response, but just love them, see
both of them as the Creator, and understand their actions as the result of their
own free will. Is this correct?



RA: This is basically correct. Of course, the balanced entity will see that in
the apparent attack of another person, the cause of their action is more complex
than the cause of the animal's attack. Thus [in understanding the complexity of
others' actions], the balanced entity is open to many more opportunities for
service to others. {v. II}



QUESTIONER: Would a perfectly balanced entity feel any emotional response in
being attacked?



RA: This is correct [there would not be any emotional reaction]. The [only]
response is love.



QUESTIONER: In 3rd density, it is difficult to maintain this [loving] response,
especially if the attack results in physical pain, but I assume that this
response [love] should be maintained even through physical pain or the loss of
one's life. Is this correct?



RA: This is correct, and further, is of major importance in understanding the
principle of balance. Balance is not indifference, but rather, the observer not
blinded by any feelings of separation and fully imbued with love. {v. II}



QUESTIONER: How can we balance the ego?



RA: We cannot work with this concept [of the "ego"], as it is misapplied and
understanding cannot come from it. {v. I}






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[UziYaH]

This is all just so awesome! Thanks David.

Howard

Light Eye <universal_heartbeat2012@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=UyhQi0VX1VEZG9sUlygldzpwiEhoEgztHDDElQ Jeh4HTHA-MB4U7BUTBpXS0dswPRzhuSNZConZKCSkVXSWBqaT84bDxlw)> wrote:
Dear Friends,

It's all about balance...

http://www.meta-religion.com/Spiritualism/New_age/defining_emotional_balance.htm

Be Well, Be Love.

David

Defining emotional balanceSource: THE RA MATERIAL/THE LAW OF ONE series
(http://www.llresearch.org/)
QUESTIONER: Is it correct that a balanced entity would not be swayed towards
either positive or negative emotions, and would remain unemotional in any
situation he might confront?



RA: This is an incorrect application of the balancing method that we discussed
[the training of mind]. The goal of the exercise we gave you -- first
experiencing your feelings, then consciously discovering their polarity in the
mind -- is not to experience a smooth flow of feelings both positive and
negative while remaining unswayed. Rather, the goal is to achieve a
[non-emotional] condition of always being unswayed. This is a simpler result,
although it does take much practice.



The catalyst of life-experience works in order for the learning of 3rd density
[and every density]. However, if a being has some form of emotional response,
even if it is only observed [and not acted upon], the entity is still using the
3D catalyst for learning. After a long period of learning, the end result is
that the catalyst is no longer needed.



At this stage of development, the entire density is no longer needed [for that
soul]. This [balanced condition] is not indifference or objectivity, but rather,
a finely tuned compassion and love which sees all things as love. Seeing "all
things as love" elicits no emotional response due to life-catalyst. Thus, the
entity is now able to become a co-Creator of their experiences. This is a truer
balance [than trying to be unswayed by the normal flow of emotions]. {v. II}



BALANCE AND PERSONAL ATTACK



QUESTIONER: So for a person who is truly balanced, if an animal or person
attacks them, they would not have an emotional response, but just love them, see
both of them as the Creator, and understand their actions as the result of their
own free will. Is this correct?



RA: This is basically correct. Of course, the balanced entity will see that in
the apparent attack of another person, the cause of their action is more complex
than the cause of the animal's attack. Thus [in understanding the complexity of
others' actions], the balanced entity is open to many more opportunities for
service to others. {v. II}



QUESTIONER: Would a perfectly balanced entity feel any emotional response in
being attacked?



RA: This is correct [there would not be any emotional reaction]. The [only]
response is love.



QUESTIONER: In 3rd density, it is difficult to maintain this [loving] response,
especially if the attack results in physical pain, but I assume that this
response [love] should be maintained even through physical pain or the loss of
one's life. Is this correct?



RA: This is correct, and further, is of major importance in understanding the
principle of balance. Balance is not indifference, but rather, the observer not
blinded by any feelings of separation and fully imbued with love. {v. II}



QUESTIONER: How can we balance the ego?



RA: We cannot work with this concept [of the "ego"], as it is misapplied and
understanding cannot come from it. {v. I}






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS
Astronomy gift Astronomy magazine Material science Astronomy telescope Astronomy
book Astronomy camera ccd

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "asc2k" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=F-WsBYiDrBFY5byToEWvMkw7_Rcm-1lzBZ_mQizidP1aVuaUCArA1tjvUQsWXYgK3HPBIVCjBO_VaNv 4ARGTbMsxtImbN1jqamp-)

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------




"For what is evil but good tortured by it's own hunger and thirst."
Kahlil
Gibran

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Petrus]

I'm re-reading the LoO myself at the moment and as I do so, I'm asking
myself...What is my motivation here?

At first I could not honestly answer the question, but then I realised...My
motivation is primarily sociological, in a physical/corporeal sense. As in,
I've long believed that more purely 4D society is going to be substantially
more positive and mutually beneficial in structure and behaviour than what
3D society has been...and that I not only wish to experience this greater
degree of positivity, but very much to participate in it.

Do other people believe that post-shift physical 4D genuinely *is* going to
be a lot more positive than what we currently experience, or am I simply a
naive Utopian? ;-)

[M.W.]

Guys!

The following account makes me blush for my failure to
see all things with love as mentioned in the addendum
at the bottom.

Story

My friend is taking care of her daughter's cat,
who is suffering either from nuerosis or demonic
possesion... or I'm demonically possessed .... anyway
this cat, named "Sweetie"(!) has been showing increasing
antagonism to me. The situation has escalated from hissing
to the current episode, hissing and ATTACKING!

The final occasion I entered her room to clean her
litter and give her food Sweetie was sitting on the
bed. She gave a baleful look, bared her fangs and hissed
(maybe I hissed back?) then hopped off the bed and
approached me. When she came close to my feet she turned
into a monstrous ball of snarling fury and attacked.
Luckily she retreated after I jumped with shocked surprise.
(I know with a RA-like certainty that if I had lost my
footing and fell prone and helpless that I would not be
writing this account from this earthly plane)

I limp off with my "owie" to rightiously complain to my
friend ... I even pull my pantleg up to show my bloody
stocking. Beth Pooh poohs my complaint. She remarks that
it is no big thing, and don't be a baby, that I probably
provoked the little sweetie pie ... all this denial coming
in the face of my arteries pumping life's blood out of my
shredded ankle!

SOOO, the ankle is bandaged and the wounds scabbed over.

But my psyche is damaged.

What do I make of this? (ONE) I'm not going into that room
again ... much less sleep there! (TWO) I'm ashamed that I
have mixed feelings about this little monster. I am
afflicted with both hate and love....What is worse I'm
shown up for being the hypocrite that I am via this
catalyst that I'm not handling well.

In all seriousness, this test did show up the shallowness
of my profession of the LoO.

(Or is my Catholic friend right...That I am possesed by
demons and this holy cat, sensing that threatening fact...)
)

(:>)) ...(:<(( ??

billyrattled

>
> >
> BALANCE AND PERSONAL ATTACK
>
>
>
> QUESTIONER: So for a person who is truly balanced, if an animal or
person attacks them, they would not have an emotional response, but
just love them, see both of them as the Creator, and understand their
actions as the result of their own free will. Is this correct?
>
>
>
> RA: This is basically correct. Of course, the balanced entity will
see that in the apparent attack of another person, the cause of their
action is more complex than the cause of the animal's attack. Thus
[in understanding the complexity of others' actions], the balanced
entity is open to many more opportunities for service to others. {v.
II}
>
>
>
> QUESTIONER: Would a perfectly balanced entity feel any emotional
response in being attacked?
>
>
>
> RA: This is correct [there would not be any emotional reaction].
The [only] response is love.

[Shawn Bernal]

As I have grown in my path, I have found that the here and now is more positive
than I had ever been aware of before. And all it took was me changing my
perspective. Thusly, I absolutely believe the future is positive.

Petrus <petrus@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=iWg3hFlAY5rj7c0EhTgoYxP4QIKo4pw9yflw3m 6g5midM46nWIGU6tNHNZC4WbetDFP4YReT-XDGdwgo)> wrote:Do other people believe that post-shift
physical 4D genuinely *is* going to
be a lot more positive than what we currently experience, or am I simply a
naive Utopian? ;-)





SPONSORED LINKS
Astronomy gift Astronomy magazine Material science Astronomy telescope Astronomy
book Astronomy camera ccd

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "asc2k" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=iL2oU6Q3smKwkqsNnhgVJHhIfj0V0bqDg6tTsM sT13cPg-UvA8W_6PCi1_HcFAlDZ-tvqOdC7NaZH0SV298izfk0ZdD7HAsCmcA)

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





---------------------------------
Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[lottacontinuum]

Hi Bill,

that makes us two, having to deal with a cat story.

I had a dream the day before yesterday, and I just remember a little fragment
about a
really ugly (looked like it had been run over by a truck), tall but skinny black
cat that
attacked me and tried to bite me in my leg and knee.

I`ve been thinking quite a bit about this dream, but I don`t get the message.
And also
would like to know why I have such a bad cat allergy. When I have contact with
cats I get
asthma and therefore try to stay away from them. They kind of sense that and
always pick
me to cuddle up next to my feet or jump on my lap.

Heven`t come to a conclusion yet.

love
Lotta

[Chris]

--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=pIeeBFEdJg-djdY_GSTG4hmS_bMp3hwIjRLxo26Mi2MgKpMmPgPrUNC7mPkaK B2HBb3PWrDmgRMuZF28U3A), "Petrus" <petrus@b...> wrote:
>
> Do other people believe that post-shift physical 4D genuinely *is*
going to be a lot more positive than what we currently experience,
or am I simply a naive Utopian? ;-)
__________________
Such an excellent question Petrus. I love it :). I think there are
two parts to this, but others may have other ideas. I think, as LoO
says, the 4D positive will remain here on Earth as etheric-type
beings and the 4D negative will go elsewhere. So, of course, my
perception is that our experience here as 4D beings will be one of
co-operation and positive experience as we learn unconditional love
and the beginings of wise choices.

We still have free choice there, however, we are choosing to co-
operate...well, at least the majority, because there could be that
one rogue who decides to switch over to negative. That one would
still pose some interesting learning experiences. So, yes, 4D
experience will be more positive than what we now experience, imo. I
don't think you are naive at all:). Chris