MABUS

[korga@...]

i just went to the site and scrolled down to see the reversal of
mabus as a ref. to sadaam. i must say that i don't like this david.
i mean the first thing to realize is that sadaam, bin laden and most
of the other players in this crisis are all cia. sadaam specifically
still on the payroll, bin laden a rogue agent presently causing a lot
of trouble. i always took the us part of mabus to refer to the us.
the third antichrist being no individual per se but the ideology as
represented by the us. i have no idea about the mab which is reason
to doubt my theory, given. but with the idea of the christ being the
sum of raised consciousness, it would seem the antithesis to that
would be that which directly opposes this consciousness. this would
be no individual. just my thoughts, love to hear yours.

incarnations
korga/dpld

[theodorepong]

--- in asc2k@y..., korga@h... wrote:
> i just went to the site and scrolled down to see the reversal of
> mabus as a ref. to sadaam. i must say that i don't like this david.

> i mean the first thing to realize is that sadaam, bin laden and most
> of the other players in this crisis are all cia. sadaam
specifically
> still on the payroll, bin laden a rogue agent presently causing a
lot
> of trouble. i always took the us part of mabus to refer to the us.

> the third antichrist being no individual per se but the ideology as
> represented by the us. i have no idea about the mab which is reason
> to doubt my theory, given. but with the idea of the christ being
the
> sum of raised consciousness, it would seem the antithesis to that
> would be that which directly opposes this consciousness. this would
> be no individual. just my thoughts, love to hear yours.
>
> incarnations
> korga/dpld

madus

i assume that is what you are getting at. very perceptive.

[Jeremy Weiland]

> i just went to the site and scrolled down to see the
> reversal of
> mabus as a ref. to sadaam. i must say that i don't
> like this david.

for all you new people or if you didn't know, the main
site for david's work, which is the topic of this
list, is ascension2000.com. you can find all sorts of
scientific information as well as his books and an
extensive archive of his readings.

with that said, i have to say that i'm not sure if
putting that stuff on the website was a good idea. it
seems so speculative for what is supposed to be a
fairly scientific site, and there's really no info to
back it up. but it's a relatively minor thing, so
don't put too much weight on it.

> i mean the first thing to realize is that sadaam,
> bin laden and most
> of the other players in this crisis are all cia.
> sadaam specifically
> still on the payroll, bin laden a rogue agent
> presently causing a lot
> of trouble.

well, none of us know any of that stuff for certain.
suffice to say, there's more going on than meets the
eye. i'd trust nostradamus before cnn any day.

> i always took the us part of mabus to
> refer to the us.
> the third antichrist being no individual per se but
> the ideology as
> represented by the us.

that's like somebody else was saying... the mabus is
really madus - or mad u.s. makes sense...?

> i have no idea about the mab
> which is reason
> to doubt my theory, given. but with the idea of the
> christ being the
> sum of raised consciousness, it would seem the
> antithesis to that
> would be that which directly opposes this
> consciousness.

what is it about the u.s. that opposes that
consciousness?

jeremy

__________________________________________________
do you yahoo!?
listen to your yahoo! mail messages from any phone.
http://phone.yahoo.com

[theodorepong]

--- in asc2k@y..., jeremy weiland <greenlantern113@y...> wrote:
> > i just went to the site and scrolled down to see the
> > reversal of
> > mabus as a ref. to sadaam. i must say that i don't
> > like this david.
>
> for all you new people or if you didn't know, the main
> site for david's work, which is the topic of this
> list, is ascension2000.com. you can find all sorts of
> scientific information as well as his books and an
> extensive archive of his readings.
>
> with that said, i have to say that i'm not sure if
> putting that stuff on the website was a good idea. it
> seems so speculative for what is supposed to be a
> fairly scientific site, and there's really no info to
> back it up. but it's a relatively minor thing, so
> don't put too much weight on it.
>
> > i mean the first thing to realize is that sadaam,
> > bin laden and most
> > of the other players in this crisis are all cia.
> > sadaam specifically
> > still on the payroll, bin laden a rogue agent
> > presently causing a lot
> > of trouble.
>
> well, none of us know any of that stuff for certain.
> suffice to say, there's more going on than meets the
> eye. i'd trust nostradamus before cnn any day.
>
> > i always took the us part of mabus to
> > refer to the us.
> > the third antichrist being no individual per se but
> > the ideology as
> > represented by the us.
>
> that's like somebody else was saying... the mabus is
> really madus - or mad u.s. makes sense...?
>
> > i have no idea about the mab
> > which is reason
> > to doubt my theory, given. but with the idea of the
> > christ being the
> > sum of raised consciousness, it would seem the
> > antithesis to that
> > would be that which directly opposes this
> > consciousness.
>
> what is it about the u.s. that opposes that
> consciousness?
>
> jeremy
>
a way of life maybe?

somehow our country was diverted from the path and got mired in
materialism.

btw...for a bibical reference to the wtc attack, see rev 18:9-24.
the time from the first plane hitting the first tower to the
collapse was about an hour.

[Jeremy Weiland]

> > what is it about the u.s. that opposes that
> > consciousness?
> a way of life maybe?
>
> somehow our country was diverted from the path and
> got mired in
> materialism.

i can see where you're coming from... that the us
kinda represents that sort of ubercapitalistic
mindset. i have a hard time accepting that one
country would be the antichrist, though. the us has a
lot of flaws, but a lot of redeeming qualities as
well. now if you wanted to say that the ac is
multinational or supernational elites, who are running
this whole scenario anyway, i'd be much more inclined
to believe that. but to say that one country is
materialistic... i think that's too broad. but i
don't know.

jeremy

__________________________________________________
do you yahoo!?
listen to your yahoo! mail messages from any phone.
http://phone.yahoo.com

[Tore]

<table bgcolor="#ffffff">
>mabus will soon die, then will come,
a horrible undoing of people and animals,
at once one will see vengeance,
one hundred powers, thirst, famine, when the comet will past
><font face="arial,helvetica,geneva,swiss,sunsans-regular">nostradamus (1555), century 2, quatrain 62</font><font face="arial,helvetica">

<font size="2">mabus man or the </font><font face="times new roman" size="3">city of central palestine <u>nablus</u>?</font><tt></tt></font>
style="font: 10pt arial"><font face="arial,helvetica"></font>

[Mingo42271@...]

<font face="arial,helvetica"><font size="2" family="sansserif" face="arial" lang="0">

mabus will soon die, then will come,

</font><font color="#000000" size="3" family="sansserif" face="arial" lang="0">tore,</font><font color="#000000" size="2" family="sansserif" face="arial" lang="0">

</font><font color="#000000" size="3" family="sansserif" face="arial" lang="0">this is probably nothing but years ago i was pondering on this and held it up to the mirror. mabus spelled backwards looked like sadam (in the mirror the b becomes a d) interesting i guess. donna</font><font color="#000000" size="2" family="sansserif" face="arial" lang="0">





a horrible undoing of people and animals,

at once one will see vengeance,

one hundred powers, thirst, famine, when the comet will past

nostradamus (1555), century 2, quatrain 62



mabus man or the </font><font color="#000000" size="3" family="serif" face="times new roman" lang="0">city of central palestine <u>nablus</u>?

</font><font color="#000000" size="3" family="sansserif" face="arial" lang="0">


</font>