raconsel@...
09-21-2001, 02:14 PM
--- in asc2k@y..., jeremy weiland <greenlantern113@y...> wrote:
> > i wonder if i am even welcome here, you see, i am
> > looking to assend
> > via the negetive path, but it is much harder because
> > of the 95
> > percent requirment.
>
> uhh, we're pretty much all on the positive path, and
> it's not likely our list is going to be much help to
> you.
>
> jeremy
the majority of people in this world and on this list are not on the positive
path at all, jeremy, although they would like to believe that they were.
ignorance - whether of the positive or negative variety - is blind and so cannot
actually know what path it is on, although many people fool themselves.
i hear what you say in your previous post about this list being interested in
david's work and not the living truth itself, and i honor your honesty and give
thanks for it. i'll be gone soon.
what concerns me is that david catagorizes his work as being a teaching for
ascension, which it is not. (see my later 'final message' post for some
scientific proof of this fact). this is why i have stayed here, you see, because
there is a great lie being promulgated here on this list (and in most other new
age groups actually).
your last post mentioned above came the closest to an admission of the fact that
david's work is not about ascension at all, and that made my heart smile because
it was simply true.
there are all kinds of older and younger souls in physical embodiment on earth
at this very speacial time. most of them are not going to ascend in this round,
and that is okay because the grace of god will positively touch all life here in
some manner anyway.
however, what is not so okay is that people who are nowhere near understanding
(and certainly not living) the requirements for ascension are being duped by
false teachers and teachings that they are eligible for ascension. this is not
so okay not least because such deluded hopefuls will know so much disappointment
and pain at the harvest time.
"to be modest in speaking truth is hypocrisy." kahlil gibran.
'nuff said.
ron
> > i wonder if i am even welcome here, you see, i am
> > looking to assend
> > via the negetive path, but it is much harder because
> > of the 95
> > percent requirment.
>
> uhh, we're pretty much all on the positive path, and
> it's not likely our list is going to be much help to
> you.
>
> jeremy
the majority of people in this world and on this list are not on the positive
path at all, jeremy, although they would like to believe that they were.
ignorance - whether of the positive or negative variety - is blind and so cannot
actually know what path it is on, although many people fool themselves.
i hear what you say in your previous post about this list being interested in
david's work and not the living truth itself, and i honor your honesty and give
thanks for it. i'll be gone soon.
what concerns me is that david catagorizes his work as being a teaching for
ascension, which it is not. (see my later 'final message' post for some
scientific proof of this fact). this is why i have stayed here, you see, because
there is a great lie being promulgated here on this list (and in most other new
age groups actually).
your last post mentioned above came the closest to an admission of the fact that
david's work is not about ascension at all, and that made my heart smile because
it was simply true.
there are all kinds of older and younger souls in physical embodiment on earth
at this very speacial time. most of them are not going to ascend in this round,
and that is okay because the grace of god will positively touch all life here in
some manner anyway.
however, what is not so okay is that people who are nowhere near understanding
(and certainly not living) the requirements for ascension are being duped by
false teachers and teachings that they are eligible for ascension. this is not
so okay not least because such deluded hopefuls will know so much disappointment
and pain at the harvest time.
"to be modest in speaking truth is hypocrisy." kahlil gibran.
'nuff said.
ron