Clark stewart
11-01-2000, 10:37 AM
dear group,
Something i thought the physicist in us would/might like..
>
>
>Geometry in Revelation
>by Gerald Charron
>ABSTRACT
>Proposed is a non-mathematical philosophical approach to the string theory
>of everything by supplying a specific geometry for each and every
>fundamental force. By linking these four forces with the four phase states,
>I arrive at a resolution between quantum and relativistic gravity. That
>paradox is explained by the roles that torsion and tension play in that and
>various other dualities in both the arts and the sciences.
>
>All geometry can be categorized as Riemannian or Euclidean. "[Riemann's
>differential geometry has the feature that as the presence of matter are
>continuously diminished, the Riemannian geometry correspondingly approaches
>a Euclidean geometry. This is an asymptotic approach, never in principle
>reaching the limit, so long as we are describing existing matter. With this
>view, the limiting Euclidean geometrical system can only represent the
>language for the laws of a perfect vacuum, everywhere."(1) The unit of
>Euclidean geometry is the point. Conversely, let us assume, the unit of
>Riemannian geometry is the spiral as one loop as in the fish symbol in
>Christianity and akin to string theory.
>
>Having established the root geometry, let us derive a model based on the
>normal Riemannian geometry by demonstrating a simple logical progression or
>extension in the form of a cylindrical spiral or a one-dimensional
>three-dimensional structure (Figure 1).
>
>Participate in this thought experiment. Imagine a small crowd of people on
>the street with a similar purpose in mind, as you would expect in a
>sociological study. Think of them first as a group and then as individuals.
>Now try to think of them as a group and as individuals at the same time.
>You cannot. Repeat this experiment as you view the model instead of people.
>The group condition would be the linear arrangement of loops. The
>individual's condition would be the non-linear shape of each loop. However,
>both conditions cannot be perceived at the same time. It is a paradox.
>
>Likewise, every member of the individuals is a whole and every member of
>the group is a part. Therefore, each whole is an integer and each part is a
>fraction.
>
>In religion as in art, we consider why. In methodology as in science, we
>consider how. When we consider why we think of a cause. When we consider
>how we think of an effect. An effect is two or more participants acting in
>unison but a cause is a singularity of purpose as an individual's mind in a
>crowd. An individual collective is an oxymoron.
>
>Physical concepts will now be assigned to the model. Remember the
>established paradoxes between momentum and position or between particle and
>wave. Concentrate on one member of the relation and the other escapes
>consideration. To establish position one must have a reference therefore
>requiring two or more things to accomplish the task. Likewise, a wave, such
>as an accelerating line of cars from a stop, requires two or more things
>for the phenomenon to be established. Nevertheless, momentum and particle
>are terms, which require no reference and can be considered as
>singularities. Of course, we can measure momentum and position roughly at
>the same time at the macroscopic level but conceptually, even though we are
>looking at the same thing, we cannot do both at once. These are not just
>separate tasks as if one were juggling. These are observations of veritably
>the same subject. To underscore that statement, the individual category is
>subjective and the group category is objective. One concept cannot do
>without the other, and yet, nor can there be a merger of the two. Those are
>paradoxes. Art is subjective and science is objective.
>
>That distinction remains contemporary. In reality, anthropologist Helen
>Fisher said that on the Rorschach test, on average, the females perceived
>the whole picture when describing patterns whereas the males perceived
>little bits of the picture when describing patterns for the ink blobs.
>Females score high with words whereas males score high with spatial
>relations.
>
>The same argument holds true for the phenomena of electricity and
>magnetism. We know that electricity is a particle. But by default, we know
>that magnetism is not a particle but a wave. Electron spin causes
>magnetism. Electricity is a precursor to magnetism. That is not to diminish
>the fact that a moving magnetic field can induce electron flow producing
>electricity. An effect can easily produce a cause because a cause is simply
>a dissected effect.
>
>To substantiate magnetism as a wave, more will be said later. In the
>meantime, notice that the angular category of the individual is
>perpendicular to the linear category of the group. That is consistent with
>the comparative geometry of the electric and magnetic fields, which are
>perpendicular to each other.
>
>In other words, it is not surprising to realize that the angular cause is
>due to torsion and that the linear effect is due to tension. That is
>proposed to be the pivotal focus and approach to further research but in a
>technical way. It also simplifies the concepts that follow.
>
>A pair of geometrical limits exists for torsion and tension. Respectively,
>they are the circle and the straight line. Both are perpendicular to each
>other and both are euclidean. The unit spiral represents movement. Its
>converse, the unit point, represents the limiting static equivalent
>describing a non-dynamic system. The parameters of the spiral have been
>determined in (2). However, according to one source, Einstein, in his later
>years, considered the speed of light as a variable.
>
>Time is the standard measure of linear movement. Since movement requires
>two or more loops to determine the phenomenon, one being a needed reference
>and, likewise, since space requires a similar arrangement to determine
>distance, we must ascribe that the three dimensions of the model in a
>linear way represent space-time. Notice that time no longer occupies only
>one dimension in calculations but should be considered as
>three-dimensional. The universe is predominantly linear.
>
>Space-time and matter-energy are equivalent (Einstein) but there is a
>difference. For the phenomenon of matter-energy, only one loop is required
>to express it. The formation of the loop represents matter and its
>deformation or unraveling or unfolding represents energy. Each loop is a
>quantum of energy. As the loops multiply, space is created. As the loops
>unwind and reduce in number, time runs down progressively. Matter-energy is
>a precursor to space-time. Waves cannot exist without the tension of
>space-time nor can a particle exist without the spin or torsion of
>matter-energy. Torsion is a precursor to tension.
>
>To put that into better perspective, in reality, the fabric of the universe
>is stretching at the same time as acquiring more energy and reducing the
>strength of gravity thereby expanding the universe more quickly (Einstein).
>
>The obvious inverse relation of the model is the male and female spirals
>causing perpetual motion.
>
>"The quantum of the gravitational field always appears in two forms, one
>that twists to the right and one that twists to the left . . . . But
>gravity is not just a force, it is also the curvature of space-time. . ."
>(3).
>
>Paradoxical Index of Equivalencies
>
>Torsion Tension
>Non-Linear/Angular Linear
>One Loop Each Two or More Loops Together
>Individual Group
>Whole Part
>Integer Fraction
>Art Science
>Subjective Objective
>Why How
>Cause Effect
>Momentum/Spin Position
>Particle Wave
>Electricity* Magnetism* (Maxwell's Equations)
>Matter-Energy* Space-Time* (Einstein's Relativity)
>Quantum Gravity Relativistic Gravity
>The asterisk* denotes established equivalencies that have been solved. The
>table delineating pairs of concepts, which are equivalent horizontally, and
>which share an identity vertically.
>
>So, obviously, the one-dimensional three-dimensional model of figure one is
>the geometry of the gravitational force. It forms the basis for the other
>three fundamental forces. It is the underlying gravitational wave for the
>other three gravitational waves. However, each force or each wave has a
>duality due to torsion and to tension. They are differentiated by their
>unique configurations of their geometry. But one thing remains the same. It
>is that the quantum and the relativistic scales of creation exist in all
>sizes and that they go hand-in-hand. They are inseparable at any scale of
>measurement or magnification. Only the predominance of one over the other
>is apparent at the different ends of the spectrum of scale. The
>multiplicity of tension exists mainly with the large end but the
>singularity of torsion exists mainly with the small end. The existence of
>quantum gravity and relativistic gravity is due to the very nature of
>torsion and tension, respectively. This is one way to equate the duality of
>gravity because torsion is simply an angular tension. Another way is to
>find common ground by the virtue of geometry alone in the comparative
>description between the very large and the very small.
>
>To resolve the macroscopic with the microscopic, we need a geometrical
>solution to match both. A source said that Einstein considered gravity to
>be simply a very low dense solid. Einstein said that walking through a
>gravitational field is like walking through solid walls. The
>one-dimensional three-dimensional (1d-3d) has already been assigned the
>gravitational interaction geometry. Evidence exists to establish this same
>geometry for the solid phase.
>
>"A typical [solid] structure is provided by . . . an organic compound ,
>resorcinol C6 H4(OH)2 . " (4)
>
>By X-ray and neutron diffraction, the projections shown reveal a pattern in
>three dimensions, a helical spiral. "Similar spirals are located . . . so
>that the whole assembly of molecules . . . are linked together to give a
>stable three dimensional crystal."(4) So, in essence, each and every
>dimension from figure one to figure seven represents both a phase state and
>a fundamental interactive force including the transitional phase states.
>The phase transitions are shown in figures 2,4 and 6 whereas the
>fundamental ones are shown in figures 1,3,5 and 7.
>
>The funicular form of figure 7 represents the geometry of both
>electromagnetism and plasma state structures. During an eclipse, solar
>"microstructures" are seen identical to strands of string underlying of
>which are filaments. Julie Anne Watko shows: "How some of the
>experimental results obtained from hair is directly applicable to solar
>physics.
>
>. Twisted hair can relax its tension without pain or breaking if the strand
>alters its geometry to a topologically equivalent state of lower energy.
>..a relaxation phenomenon called writhing.
>.A system with excessive helicity will deform its geometry to reduce its
>energy. A system with low net helicity will be stable in a simple geometry.
>.The coronal plasma thus behaves much like a system of hair strands with
>ends firmly rooted in the photosphere." (5)
>To writhe is to graduate to the funicular form of the model or the 4d-3d
>mode. A state of lower energy begins at the transition state figure 6. As
>torsion is progressively increased in a 3d-3d loop, tension is suddenly
>released forming the Transition State before continuing into the double
>helix characteristic of a magnetic wave. "Magnetic helicity" and how the
>"rope-like structures" are formed is the whole subject of Watko's paper
>including the descriptive equation.
>
>Once I had a similar wire, which I twisted at the 1d-3d stage whereupon a
>knot immediately developed and projected, one at a time, four 4d-3d
>radiants perpendicular to each other on one plane. Not knowing the
>significance of the demonstration, I stopped there. If all directions in
>one plane are envisioned with such rays, then one should expect a favorable
>possibility that the other planes should also be filled likewise in time.
>In fact, the sun does tie into knots and spews solar mass ejections or
>flares especially during the solar maximus. That exhibits isotropic
>behavior characteristic of electromagnetism.
>
>Meteorology provides an interesting triad. The hurricane, the tornado, and
>possibly the jet stream demonstrate the 2d-3d, the transition, and the
>3d-3d respectively although the actual structure of the jet stream is not
>fully known. Although fluid dynamics dominantly illustrates the forms for
>the 2d-3d and 3d-3d phases and their transition, there is no evidence to
>discern between them. However, it is generally known that there is a 2d-3d
>gravitational wave structure at the entrance of black holes where it is
>responsible for radiation for which the weak force is noted. Therefore, the
>quantum level can exhibit its presence at the cosmological scale.
>
>Part of the difficulty of seeing structure of fluids at the molecular level
>is what is known as "short-range order" of the two phases in question as
>opposed to the "long-range order" of the 1d-3d and 4d-3d phases. This,
>however, corresponds directly with the short range of the weak and strong
>forces and the long range of the gravitational and electromagnetic forces.
>
>In order of increasing strength of the forces, we have gravity, the weak,
>electromagnetism and the strong. 'What is intriguing is that you would
>expect that the 4d-3d stage would be strongest because it is the most
>active phase but because of "writhing," as discussed earlier, the 3d-3d
>stage of the aptly named strong force takes its place. Like the increasing
>order of activity and strength of the phases, "at sufficiently high
>energies the weak interactions effectively become "strong" . . ."(6).
>Similarly, the lower energy photons of the weak nuclear force become the
>stronger energy photons of the electromagnetic force. Therefore, the
>increasing scale of both force and model coincide.
>
>In summary, we have four real space-time dimensions with none of them
>"hidden". As shocking as it should seem, instead of three spatial Euclidean
>dimensions, we have four Riemannian spatial dimensions because of the
>spiral and especially because of the plasma phase where we do not live as
>in the context of our environment.
>As far as "hierarchy" goes, the said dimensions represent the low energy
>hierarchy. The higher energy hierarchy is represented by the 4d-3d stage
>acting as the 1d-3d base stage in repeating the set of configurations with
>which you are now familiar. There are, consequently, an electro-weak stage
>and an electro-strong stage but there is no electro-weak-strong stage
>unless you consider a transition stage of the higher energy order of the
>electromagnetic base stage. Gravity, of course, underlies all. As far as
>particles goes, I can only speculate that the base 1d-3d stage represents
>bosons in all the dimensions and the three-family fermions are represented
>by the outer geometry of the stages other than gravity.
>
>As far as prediction goes, the nuclear forces should produce their own
>duality expressed in a similar fashion as gravity and electromagnetism. In
>addition, there should be four phase states at the quantum level.
>
>As in psychology, we must establish in physics what is normal before
>understanding what is abnormal thereby setting controls to what is the
>acceptable geometry for the kingdom of physics as there is the
>classification for the animal kingdom and the plant kingdom. To describe
>space as curved where Riemannian geometry is concerned is incomplete. What
>is complete is the spiral because a spiral describes a complete curve in
>three dimensions. Adopt that awareness and we will successfully proceed in
>classifying physics, the known father of all the sciences.
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------\
-
>
>
>My work had a surprising effect on me, which I didn't realize before. It
>appears that the scientific community has mixed up the concepts of
>matter-energy and space-time while discerning the dimensions of the
>universe as we have come to accept. The tradition or convention has been to
>ascribe "space" as having three dimensions with one dimension of "time" for
>a total of four dimensions. But actually the three spatial dimensions they
>speak of, actually, belong to the dimensions of matter-energy and
>restrictively so. The concepts of time and space, according to my work
>describing space-time as the linear representation in my model, grows to a
>dimensional progression from one through four. When we look at an object,
>we are seeing the dimensions of matter-energy. Whereas, when we look at the
>structure of that object, we are seeing the dimensions of space-time.
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------\
-
>
>
>
>See (7) figures in appendix.
>
>References
>
> 1.. Kendal Sachs. Relativity in Our Time. From Physics to Human
>Relations. Taylor and Francis. London., 1993. p.8
> 2.. T.S. Natarajan. 6 Unified Conceptual Foundation for Relativity and
>Quantum Mechanics. Physics Essays. Vol. 9, No. 2. 1996.
> 3.. F. David Peat. Superstrings and the Search for the Theory of
>Everything. Contemporary Books. Chicago. 1988. p.16,19,20.
> 4.. George E. Bacon. The Architecture of Solids. Taylor and Francis Ltd.
>London. 1981. p. 49-52.
> 5.. Julie Anne Watko. What is Helicity? Demonstration of Helicity.
>Intermediate Seminar. 1998. http://www.pha.jhu.edu/
> f.. E.U. Condon, Hugh Odishaw editors. Handbook of Physics. 2nd edition.
>McGraw-Hill Book Company. New York. 1967. p. 9-163.
>
>
>Appendix
>
>Figure 1 1d-3d gravity/solid
> one-dimensional three-dimensional
>
>
>
>Figure 2 transition 1
>
>
> Figure 3. 2d-3d weak/liquid
> two-dimensional three-dimensional
>
>
>
>Figure 4. transition 2
>
>
>
>Figure 5. 3d-3d strong/gas
>
>
>
>
>Figure 6. transition 3
>
>
>
> Figure 7. 4d-3d electromagnetism/plasma
> four-dimensional three-dimensional
__________________________________________________ _______________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
Something i thought the physicist in us would/might like..
>
>
>Geometry in Revelation
>by Gerald Charron
>ABSTRACT
>Proposed is a non-mathematical philosophical approach to the string theory
>of everything by supplying a specific geometry for each and every
>fundamental force. By linking these four forces with the four phase states,
>I arrive at a resolution between quantum and relativistic gravity. That
>paradox is explained by the roles that torsion and tension play in that and
>various other dualities in both the arts and the sciences.
>
>All geometry can be categorized as Riemannian or Euclidean. "[Riemann's
>differential geometry has the feature that as the presence of matter are
>continuously diminished, the Riemannian geometry correspondingly approaches
>a Euclidean geometry. This is an asymptotic approach, never in principle
>reaching the limit, so long as we are describing existing matter. With this
>view, the limiting Euclidean geometrical system can only represent the
>language for the laws of a perfect vacuum, everywhere."(1) The unit of
>Euclidean geometry is the point. Conversely, let us assume, the unit of
>Riemannian geometry is the spiral as one loop as in the fish symbol in
>Christianity and akin to string theory.
>
>Having established the root geometry, let us derive a model based on the
>normal Riemannian geometry by demonstrating a simple logical progression or
>extension in the form of a cylindrical spiral or a one-dimensional
>three-dimensional structure (Figure 1).
>
>Participate in this thought experiment. Imagine a small crowd of people on
>the street with a similar purpose in mind, as you would expect in a
>sociological study. Think of them first as a group and then as individuals.
>Now try to think of them as a group and as individuals at the same time.
>You cannot. Repeat this experiment as you view the model instead of people.
>The group condition would be the linear arrangement of loops. The
>individual's condition would be the non-linear shape of each loop. However,
>both conditions cannot be perceived at the same time. It is a paradox.
>
>Likewise, every member of the individuals is a whole and every member of
>the group is a part. Therefore, each whole is an integer and each part is a
>fraction.
>
>In religion as in art, we consider why. In methodology as in science, we
>consider how. When we consider why we think of a cause. When we consider
>how we think of an effect. An effect is two or more participants acting in
>unison but a cause is a singularity of purpose as an individual's mind in a
>crowd. An individual collective is an oxymoron.
>
>Physical concepts will now be assigned to the model. Remember the
>established paradoxes between momentum and position or between particle and
>wave. Concentrate on one member of the relation and the other escapes
>consideration. To establish position one must have a reference therefore
>requiring two or more things to accomplish the task. Likewise, a wave, such
>as an accelerating line of cars from a stop, requires two or more things
>for the phenomenon to be established. Nevertheless, momentum and particle
>are terms, which require no reference and can be considered as
>singularities. Of course, we can measure momentum and position roughly at
>the same time at the macroscopic level but conceptually, even though we are
>looking at the same thing, we cannot do both at once. These are not just
>separate tasks as if one were juggling. These are observations of veritably
>the same subject. To underscore that statement, the individual category is
>subjective and the group category is objective. One concept cannot do
>without the other, and yet, nor can there be a merger of the two. Those are
>paradoxes. Art is subjective and science is objective.
>
>That distinction remains contemporary. In reality, anthropologist Helen
>Fisher said that on the Rorschach test, on average, the females perceived
>the whole picture when describing patterns whereas the males perceived
>little bits of the picture when describing patterns for the ink blobs.
>Females score high with words whereas males score high with spatial
>relations.
>
>The same argument holds true for the phenomena of electricity and
>magnetism. We know that electricity is a particle. But by default, we know
>that magnetism is not a particle but a wave. Electron spin causes
>magnetism. Electricity is a precursor to magnetism. That is not to diminish
>the fact that a moving magnetic field can induce electron flow producing
>electricity. An effect can easily produce a cause because a cause is simply
>a dissected effect.
>
>To substantiate magnetism as a wave, more will be said later. In the
>meantime, notice that the angular category of the individual is
>perpendicular to the linear category of the group. That is consistent with
>the comparative geometry of the electric and magnetic fields, which are
>perpendicular to each other.
>
>In other words, it is not surprising to realize that the angular cause is
>due to torsion and that the linear effect is due to tension. That is
>proposed to be the pivotal focus and approach to further research but in a
>technical way. It also simplifies the concepts that follow.
>
>A pair of geometrical limits exists for torsion and tension. Respectively,
>they are the circle and the straight line. Both are perpendicular to each
>other and both are euclidean. The unit spiral represents movement. Its
>converse, the unit point, represents the limiting static equivalent
>describing a non-dynamic system. The parameters of the spiral have been
>determined in (2). However, according to one source, Einstein, in his later
>years, considered the speed of light as a variable.
>
>Time is the standard measure of linear movement. Since movement requires
>two or more loops to determine the phenomenon, one being a needed reference
>and, likewise, since space requires a similar arrangement to determine
>distance, we must ascribe that the three dimensions of the model in a
>linear way represent space-time. Notice that time no longer occupies only
>one dimension in calculations but should be considered as
>three-dimensional. The universe is predominantly linear.
>
>Space-time and matter-energy are equivalent (Einstein) but there is a
>difference. For the phenomenon of matter-energy, only one loop is required
>to express it. The formation of the loop represents matter and its
>deformation or unraveling or unfolding represents energy. Each loop is a
>quantum of energy. As the loops multiply, space is created. As the loops
>unwind and reduce in number, time runs down progressively. Matter-energy is
>a precursor to space-time. Waves cannot exist without the tension of
>space-time nor can a particle exist without the spin or torsion of
>matter-energy. Torsion is a precursor to tension.
>
>To put that into better perspective, in reality, the fabric of the universe
>is stretching at the same time as acquiring more energy and reducing the
>strength of gravity thereby expanding the universe more quickly (Einstein).
>
>The obvious inverse relation of the model is the male and female spirals
>causing perpetual motion.
>
>"The quantum of the gravitational field always appears in two forms, one
>that twists to the right and one that twists to the left . . . . But
>gravity is not just a force, it is also the curvature of space-time. . ."
>(3).
>
>Paradoxical Index of Equivalencies
>
>Torsion Tension
>Non-Linear/Angular Linear
>One Loop Each Two or More Loops Together
>Individual Group
>Whole Part
>Integer Fraction
>Art Science
>Subjective Objective
>Why How
>Cause Effect
>Momentum/Spin Position
>Particle Wave
>Electricity* Magnetism* (Maxwell's Equations)
>Matter-Energy* Space-Time* (Einstein's Relativity)
>Quantum Gravity Relativistic Gravity
>The asterisk* denotes established equivalencies that have been solved. The
>table delineating pairs of concepts, which are equivalent horizontally, and
>which share an identity vertically.
>
>So, obviously, the one-dimensional three-dimensional model of figure one is
>the geometry of the gravitational force. It forms the basis for the other
>three fundamental forces. It is the underlying gravitational wave for the
>other three gravitational waves. However, each force or each wave has a
>duality due to torsion and to tension. They are differentiated by their
>unique configurations of their geometry. But one thing remains the same. It
>is that the quantum and the relativistic scales of creation exist in all
>sizes and that they go hand-in-hand. They are inseparable at any scale of
>measurement or magnification. Only the predominance of one over the other
>is apparent at the different ends of the spectrum of scale. The
>multiplicity of tension exists mainly with the large end but the
>singularity of torsion exists mainly with the small end. The existence of
>quantum gravity and relativistic gravity is due to the very nature of
>torsion and tension, respectively. This is one way to equate the duality of
>gravity because torsion is simply an angular tension. Another way is to
>find common ground by the virtue of geometry alone in the comparative
>description between the very large and the very small.
>
>To resolve the macroscopic with the microscopic, we need a geometrical
>solution to match both. A source said that Einstein considered gravity to
>be simply a very low dense solid. Einstein said that walking through a
>gravitational field is like walking through solid walls. The
>one-dimensional three-dimensional (1d-3d) has already been assigned the
>gravitational interaction geometry. Evidence exists to establish this same
>geometry for the solid phase.
>
>"A typical [solid] structure is provided by . . . an organic compound ,
>resorcinol C6 H4(OH)2 . " (4)
>
>By X-ray and neutron diffraction, the projections shown reveal a pattern in
>three dimensions, a helical spiral. "Similar spirals are located . . . so
>that the whole assembly of molecules . . . are linked together to give a
>stable three dimensional crystal."(4) So, in essence, each and every
>dimension from figure one to figure seven represents both a phase state and
>a fundamental interactive force including the transitional phase states.
>The phase transitions are shown in figures 2,4 and 6 whereas the
>fundamental ones are shown in figures 1,3,5 and 7.
>
>The funicular form of figure 7 represents the geometry of both
>electromagnetism and plasma state structures. During an eclipse, solar
>"microstructures" are seen identical to strands of string underlying of
>which are filaments. Julie Anne Watko shows: "How some of the
>experimental results obtained from hair is directly applicable to solar
>physics.
>
>. Twisted hair can relax its tension without pain or breaking if the strand
>alters its geometry to a topologically equivalent state of lower energy.
>..a relaxation phenomenon called writhing.
>.A system with excessive helicity will deform its geometry to reduce its
>energy. A system with low net helicity will be stable in a simple geometry.
>.The coronal plasma thus behaves much like a system of hair strands with
>ends firmly rooted in the photosphere." (5)
>To writhe is to graduate to the funicular form of the model or the 4d-3d
>mode. A state of lower energy begins at the transition state figure 6. As
>torsion is progressively increased in a 3d-3d loop, tension is suddenly
>released forming the Transition State before continuing into the double
>helix characteristic of a magnetic wave. "Magnetic helicity" and how the
>"rope-like structures" are formed is the whole subject of Watko's paper
>including the descriptive equation.
>
>Once I had a similar wire, which I twisted at the 1d-3d stage whereupon a
>knot immediately developed and projected, one at a time, four 4d-3d
>radiants perpendicular to each other on one plane. Not knowing the
>significance of the demonstration, I stopped there. If all directions in
>one plane are envisioned with such rays, then one should expect a favorable
>possibility that the other planes should also be filled likewise in time.
>In fact, the sun does tie into knots and spews solar mass ejections or
>flares especially during the solar maximus. That exhibits isotropic
>behavior characteristic of electromagnetism.
>
>Meteorology provides an interesting triad. The hurricane, the tornado, and
>possibly the jet stream demonstrate the 2d-3d, the transition, and the
>3d-3d respectively although the actual structure of the jet stream is not
>fully known. Although fluid dynamics dominantly illustrates the forms for
>the 2d-3d and 3d-3d phases and their transition, there is no evidence to
>discern between them. However, it is generally known that there is a 2d-3d
>gravitational wave structure at the entrance of black holes where it is
>responsible for radiation for which the weak force is noted. Therefore, the
>quantum level can exhibit its presence at the cosmological scale.
>
>Part of the difficulty of seeing structure of fluids at the molecular level
>is what is known as "short-range order" of the two phases in question as
>opposed to the "long-range order" of the 1d-3d and 4d-3d phases. This,
>however, corresponds directly with the short range of the weak and strong
>forces and the long range of the gravitational and electromagnetic forces.
>
>In order of increasing strength of the forces, we have gravity, the weak,
>electromagnetism and the strong. 'What is intriguing is that you would
>expect that the 4d-3d stage would be strongest because it is the most
>active phase but because of "writhing," as discussed earlier, the 3d-3d
>stage of the aptly named strong force takes its place. Like the increasing
>order of activity and strength of the phases, "at sufficiently high
>energies the weak interactions effectively become "strong" . . ."(6).
>Similarly, the lower energy photons of the weak nuclear force become the
>stronger energy photons of the electromagnetic force. Therefore, the
>increasing scale of both force and model coincide.
>
>In summary, we have four real space-time dimensions with none of them
>"hidden". As shocking as it should seem, instead of three spatial Euclidean
>dimensions, we have four Riemannian spatial dimensions because of the
>spiral and especially because of the plasma phase where we do not live as
>in the context of our environment.
>As far as "hierarchy" goes, the said dimensions represent the low energy
>hierarchy. The higher energy hierarchy is represented by the 4d-3d stage
>acting as the 1d-3d base stage in repeating the set of configurations with
>which you are now familiar. There are, consequently, an electro-weak stage
>and an electro-strong stage but there is no electro-weak-strong stage
>unless you consider a transition stage of the higher energy order of the
>electromagnetic base stage. Gravity, of course, underlies all. As far as
>particles goes, I can only speculate that the base 1d-3d stage represents
>bosons in all the dimensions and the three-family fermions are represented
>by the outer geometry of the stages other than gravity.
>
>As far as prediction goes, the nuclear forces should produce their own
>duality expressed in a similar fashion as gravity and electromagnetism. In
>addition, there should be four phase states at the quantum level.
>
>As in psychology, we must establish in physics what is normal before
>understanding what is abnormal thereby setting controls to what is the
>acceptable geometry for the kingdom of physics as there is the
>classification for the animal kingdom and the plant kingdom. To describe
>space as curved where Riemannian geometry is concerned is incomplete. What
>is complete is the spiral because a spiral describes a complete curve in
>three dimensions. Adopt that awareness and we will successfully proceed in
>classifying physics, the known father of all the sciences.
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------\
-
>
>
>My work had a surprising effect on me, which I didn't realize before. It
>appears that the scientific community has mixed up the concepts of
>matter-energy and space-time while discerning the dimensions of the
>universe as we have come to accept. The tradition or convention has been to
>ascribe "space" as having three dimensions with one dimension of "time" for
>a total of four dimensions. But actually the three spatial dimensions they
>speak of, actually, belong to the dimensions of matter-energy and
>restrictively so. The concepts of time and space, according to my work
>describing space-time as the linear representation in my model, grows to a
>dimensional progression from one through four. When we look at an object,
>we are seeing the dimensions of matter-energy. Whereas, when we look at the
>structure of that object, we are seeing the dimensions of space-time.
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------\
-
>
>
>
>See (7) figures in appendix.
>
>References
>
> 1.. Kendal Sachs. Relativity in Our Time. From Physics to Human
>Relations. Taylor and Francis. London., 1993. p.8
> 2.. T.S. Natarajan. 6 Unified Conceptual Foundation for Relativity and
>Quantum Mechanics. Physics Essays. Vol. 9, No. 2. 1996.
> 3.. F. David Peat. Superstrings and the Search for the Theory of
>Everything. Contemporary Books. Chicago. 1988. p.16,19,20.
> 4.. George E. Bacon. The Architecture of Solids. Taylor and Francis Ltd.
>London. 1981. p. 49-52.
> 5.. Julie Anne Watko. What is Helicity? Demonstration of Helicity.
>Intermediate Seminar. 1998. http://www.pha.jhu.edu/
> f.. E.U. Condon, Hugh Odishaw editors. Handbook of Physics. 2nd edition.
>McGraw-Hill Book Company. New York. 1967. p. 9-163.
>
>
>Appendix
>
>Figure 1 1d-3d gravity/solid
> one-dimensional three-dimensional
>
>
>
>Figure 2 transition 1
>
>
> Figure 3. 2d-3d weak/liquid
> two-dimensional three-dimensional
>
>
>
>Figure 4. transition 2
>
>
>
>Figure 5. 3d-3d strong/gas
>
>
>
>
>Figure 6. transition 3
>
>
>
> Figure 7. 4d-3d electromagnetism/plasma
> four-dimensional three-dimensional
__________________________________________________ _______________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.