marcelomjr
03-27-2005, 11:41 PM
Hello,
Lew Paxton Price talks about the rejection of his theory by peer
reviewers:
"Updated: March 27, 2005
Added article submitted to magazine with cover letter,
rejection with supposed reasons for article being rejected,
and analysis of reviewer's rejection.
This example shows what is typical or perhaps better than
typical for the publishing industry, and how "peer" review
actually prevents progress in science.
(...)"
TYPICAL EXAMPLE OF "PEER" REVIEW
http://www.softcom.net/users/greebo/artexamp1.htm
See article:
SUBMITTED MAGAZINE ARTICLE
GRAVITY
Lew Paxton Price
Copyright (C) 2005 by Lew Paxton Price
http://www.softcom.net/users/greebo/gravart2.htm
Regards,
Marcelo M. Jr.
Lew Paxton Price talks about the rejection of his theory by peer
reviewers:
"Updated: March 27, 2005
Added article submitted to magazine with cover letter,
rejection with supposed reasons for article being rejected,
and analysis of reviewer's rejection.
This example shows what is typical or perhaps better than
typical for the publishing industry, and how "peer" review
actually prevents progress in science.
(...)"
TYPICAL EXAMPLE OF "PEER" REVIEW
http://www.softcom.net/users/greebo/artexamp1.htm
See article:
SUBMITTED MAGAZINE ARTICLE
GRAVITY
Lew Paxton Price
Copyright (C) 2005 by Lew Paxton Price
http://www.softcom.net/users/greebo/gravart2.htm
Regards,
Marcelo M. Jr.