srachele2004
01-14-2005, 10:40 AM
dear group,
kudos to david for his work with richard hoagland.
i've looked at richard hoagland's material several times in the past,
but the latest images of artifical objects on the martian surface
leave no doubt that these are not naturally occurring formations.
anyone with even a rudimentary understanding of wind and water erosion
can rule this out when it comes to evenly-spaced, square or pyramidal
edges and nearly identical artifacts found in different spots. wind
and erosion is constantly changing, with varying angles and velocity
of wind causing smooth and vague edges on rocks that are exposed. that
is not what is being photographed here.
http://www.enterprisemission.com/spirit2.htm
now, instead of believers and skeptics, we have those who are willing
to acknowledge what they are looking at and those who are afraid to
acknowledge it.
--sal
kudos to david for his work with richard hoagland.
i've looked at richard hoagland's material several times in the past,
but the latest images of artifical objects on the martian surface
leave no doubt that these are not naturally occurring formations.
anyone with even a rudimentary understanding of wind and water erosion
can rule this out when it comes to evenly-spaced, square or pyramidal
edges and nearly identical artifacts found in different spots. wind
and erosion is constantly changing, with varying angles and velocity
of wind causing smooth and vague edges on rocks that are exposed. that
is not what is being photographed here.
http://www.enterprisemission.com/spirit2.htm
now, instead of believers and skeptics, we have those who are willing
to acknowledge what they are looking at and those who are afraid to
acknowledge it.
--sal