PDA

View Full Version : ET assistance


mawk
08-15-2004, 03:48 AM
Hi Neil and Chris,

The Law of Squares seems to me to be a simple arithmetic series of doubling:

Square Result
1 2
2 4 (2*2)
3 8 (2*2*2 or 2^3)
4 16 (2^4)
5 32 (2^5)
6 64 (2^6)
7 128 (2^7)
8 256 (2^8)
9 512 (2^9)
10 1024 (2^10)

Cheers,

Mawk

NEIL HADDON
08-15-2004, 10:06 AM
Book One, Session 7 , asked about service to the being humans on Earth, Ra says:






.....

The service available for our offering to those who call us is equivalent to the
square of the distortion/need of that calling divided by, or integrated with,
the basic Law of One in its distortion indicating the free will of those who are
not aware of the unity of creation.



Questioner: From this, I am assuming that the difficulty that you have in
contacting this planet at this time is the mixture of people here, some being
aware of the unity, and some not, and for this reason you cannot come openly or
give proof of your contact. Is this correct?



Ra: I am Ra. As we just repeated through this instrument, we must integrate all
of the portions of your social memory complex in its illusory disintegration
form. Then the product of this can be seen as the limit of our ability to serve.
We are fortunate that the Law of Service squares the desires of those who call.
Otherwise, we would have no beingness in this time/space at this present
continuum of the illusion. In short, you are basically correct. The thought of
not being able is not a part of our basic thought-form complex towards your
peoples, but rather it is a maximal consideration of what is possible.



Questioner: By squared, do you mean that if ten people call you can count that,
when comparing it to the planetary ratio, as 100 people, squaring ten and
getting 100?



Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. The square is sequential-one, two, three, four,
each squared by the next number.

[N: What does this mean?]

Questioner: If only ten entities on earth required your services how would you
compute their calling by using this square method?



Ra: I am Ra. We would square one ten sequential times, raising the number to the
tenth square.

[N: ???}

Questioner: What would be the result of this calculation?



Ra: I am Ra. The result is difficult to transmit. It is 1,012, approximately.
The entities who call are sometimes not totally unified in their calling and,
thus, the squaring slightly less. Thus, there is a statistical loss over a
period of call. However, perhaps you may see by this statistically corrected
information the squaring mechanism.

[N: Er...No!]

Questioner: About how many entities at present on planet Earth are calling for
your services?



Ra: I am Ra. I am called personally by 352,000. The Confederation, in its entire
spectrum of entity-complexes, is called by 632,000,000 of your mind/body/spirit
complexes. These numbers have been simplified.



Questioner: Can you tell me what the result of the application of the Law of
Squares is to those figures?



Ra: I am Ra. The number is approximately meaningless in the finite sense as
there are many, many digits. It, however, constitutes a great calling which we
of all creation feel and hear as if our own entities were distorted towards a
great and overwhelming sorrow. It demands our service.



N: Am I missing something obvious, or can someone explain the mathematics to me?



The basic message is, "Ask and ye shall recieve.", which is wonderful, and the
extent of the assistance is massive, which is also wonderful. I'd just like to
understand the calculation. Any thoughts?



Love.

Neil


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Chris Hamilton
08-15-2004, 12:36 PM
> Ra: I am Ra. The result is difficult to transmit. It is 1,012,
approximately. The entities who call are sometimes not totally unified in
their calling and, thus, the squaring slightly less. Thus, there is a
statistical loss over a period of call. However, perhaps you may see by this
statistically corrected information the squaring mechanism.
>
> [N: Er...No!]

Hi Neil,

I'm gonna take a stab at this, but I don't know if I'm right here or not. I
simply came up with the same answer as Ra:) If you take the number 2 and add
it to the squares of the numbers 3 thru 14, it will equal 1,012. I am
supposing you don't add 1 because you must first have a sequential number,
like1+1=2, and you don't square 2 because it's the first sequential #? I've
always wanted an explanation here too Neil, maybe someone else has a good
explanation, cuz mine is just playing with numbers:) Chris

NEIL HADDON
08-16-2004, 06:12 AM
Thanks, Mawk. That looks good to me.
Must have a word with Ra about their English.....
Love.
Neil
----- Original Message -----
From: mawk
To: asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=CkwGc6KV6ViSvEzwb0aN3QotvkIAWXRDu6uii5 PENXAs4DqmTgXkHl4e5Tb7ttwknqFC0c1Jocs23_6_UA)
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: [asc2k] ET assistance


Hi Neil and Chris,

The Law of Squares seems to me to be a simple arithmetic series of doubling:

Square Result
1 2
2 4 (2*2)
3 8 (2*2*2 or 2^3)
4 16 (2^4)
5 32 (2^5)
6 64 (2^6)
7 128 (2^7)
8 256 (2^8)
9 512 (2^9)
10 1024 (2^10)

Cheers,

Mawk



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/asc2k/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=Buf3rKoY6MRRPWNg58jlwm5NCXNqe2nxnfmoeF s73pnrEqe-U3xvmAGP64cLt7Zw9xPIx9SxYShmxUsYi99kdESlPpV_art6)

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Chris Hamilton
08-16-2004, 06:22 AM
Thanks Mawk, but what happened to 1,012 from the reading? It seems to be
missing from this:) Chris

From: "mawk" <mawk109@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=Z5PJcdpDBiKCvWSNrCHNES8BaaMchPFkzS4NM4 F7cv2szCjBG2IF2Bx-QRhNWVHdpzqiB6s3CJu9CqlvAQQ)>
> The Law of Squares seems to me to be a simple arithmetic series of
doubling:>
> Square Result
> 1 2
> 2 4 (2*2)
> 3 8 (2*2*2 or 2^3)
> 4 16 (2^4)
> 5 32 (2^5)
> 6 64 (2^6)
> 7 128 (2^7)
> 8 256 (2^8)
> 9 512 (2^9)
> 10 1024 (2^10)>
> Cheers, Mawk

NEIL HADDON
08-16-2004, 07:11 AM
Chris,
Ra goes on:
": I am Ra. The result is difficult to transmit. It is 1,012, approximately. The
entities who call are sometimes not totally unified in their calling and, thus,
the squaring slightly less. Thus, there is a statistical loss over a period of
call. "

A certain amount of false alarms, hoax calls, or, " It got better all by itself"
- as happens with the TV, 'phone, washing m/c etc.
Love.
Neil
----- Original Message -----
From: Chris Hamilton
To: asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=VU9l6Ku6BgvfE_VA5QA2UrRuakbIcSy5tmbYiW oh_0hv4cmULgs9uknRStYO3HC6DwwCYJ0Lphtha38)
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: [asc2k] ET assistance


Thanks Mawk, but what happened to 1,012 from the reading? It seems to be
missing from this:) Chris

From: "mawk" <mawk109@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=W71AJCDRLmN03nzMfE0rfUXKjjb3FekGahLLKU H2UtvgRVzq6QOgm-1hyK9aicWadrNlf997aPoFsq20)>
> The Law of Squares seems to me to be a simple arithmetic series of
doubling:>
> Square Result
> 1 2
> 2 4 (2*2)
> 3 8 (2*2*2 or 2^3)
> 4 16 (2^4)
> 5 32 (2^5)
> 6 64 (2^6)
> 7 128 (2^7)
> 8 256 (2^8)
> 9 512 (2^9)
> 10 1024 (2^10)>
> Cheers, Mawk


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/asc2k/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=EMuSGPza4O6R4Dkf5eoKJFXrJ4h4fQJPS2MM4g oJAXCLOGnDVBYFMqew3IwQ_l8q2LSSgwQ7JA2FjVqtCmnIG5Ym XyBFpXEQtBg)

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Mozart
08-15-2006, 05:49 PM
In a previous post was said:

"If there are any extraterrestrials watching us at the
moment, I hope they
have sufficient respect for our own free will that
they actually leave us
alone."


I have done a lot of reading/research on this issue of
ETs and their interactions with us humans and I can
state with a high level of confidence that there are
thousands of ETs in/on/around our earth...thousands of
them. They are doing more than just "watching"
us--many of them are very actively involved with
mitigations of numerous events, such as attempted
trrst events (of which many, many events
planned/attempted by the Illoonynaughties since the
911 event were totally disrupted by advanced ET tech);
mitigations of damaging pollution from wars and
industrialization; mitigations of the effects of
global warming and so on.


Such ET mitigation efforts, however, are done with the
fullest possible respect for the free will of us 3-D
humans on this planet--up to the limit of allowing the
karmic effects of negative, anthropocentric
effects/events to be felt by us humans without
destroying the sum total of the free will of the
masses and without destroying earth herself.


Numerous attempts at nooky dets have been foiled; ET
work on reducing the effects of bio-engineered
diseases is on-going, allowing only a few cases to
happen...the largest numbers of cases now seem to be
the Morgellon's Disease cases, each case of which are
allowed for karmic reasons; ET tech is on-going with
the mitigation of the effects of the chemtrail
spraying program; ET tech is ongoing with keeping the
planet relatively balanced so that the bio-sphere can
be stable up to the 2012 moment so that the greatest
possible numbers of people can be given the greatest
possible of opportunities to prepare for the coming
Harvest...and many other things are done by our
benevolent ET guardians.


Ra himself said that our earth is under a tight
quarantine, so this begs the question: "Who's doing
the 'quarantine'?"


ET assistance does not include a mass landing...unless
abolutely neccessary. The ETs by far would rather
assist behind-the-scenes without due credit so that
the free will of individual people and the masses can
be respected to the greatest possible degree. It is
also better for humans to wonder about possible ET
assistance than to have it really obvious--the mystery
of any alledged ET assistance would prompt at least a
few people to explore and learn the depths of the
mystery and in the process of the exploration of the
mysteries of possible ET involvement, the explorers
could discover a bit about themselves/otherselves the
underlying Oneness within all.


I am now very certain that our ET guardians have
already assisted us thousands of times and will
continue to do so up until the harvest and aftwards,
no doubt. I have arrived at this perception through
careful reading of reliable information, as well as
personally-answered questions of my own on this
matter. I am personally very, very grateful for all
ET assistance and I ask for more assistance than ever.
I'd love to have hard proof of the ET assistance, but
I'm satisfied with the mystery of it; such assistance
is a key piece of my own peace of mind with regards to
the current events in our crazy--azzed world.


We have been assisted more than we know and we are
loved more than we know. The One really knows what
It's doing.


~Seth

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

jpstephens2012
08-15-2006, 07:56 PM
Great post Seth. Check out this link to the Web site of Dr. Richard
Boylan: http://www.drboylan.com/snpressrelease.html if you aren't
aware of it already. I'm having a great time in my awakening. I've
discovered things that thrill me to death and things that scare the
hell out of me such as Lt. Col. Tom Bearden's site. But all in all
It's being a hell of a ride! :)

William Mount
08-16-2006, 08:53 AM
--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=PX6hSd4bNNIw4mYsIfQ57VfTnWdN0xH8oKaFIX kRX_Qx3yz2OvNaMT9nrI-BMNWJsHnaZOYtmwtDqFppI--a), "jpstephens2012" <jpstephenslives@...>
wrote:
>
> Great post Seth. Check out this link to the Web site of Dr. Richard
> Boylan: http://www.drboylan.com/snpressrelease.html if you aren't
> aware of it already. I'm having a great time in my awakening. I've
> discovered things that thrill me to death and things that scare the
> hell out of me such as Lt. Col. Tom Bearden's site. But all in all
> It's being a hell of a ride! :)
>
In checking out Dr Richard Boylan Web site where he writes about the
Star People, I came across the following quote: "The truth is that
mankind was created by an advance race of people...." How does this
fit in with the fact that we are creative parts of the One Infinite
Creator?

jpstephens2012
08-16-2006, 02:42 PM
> In checking out Dr Richard Boylan Web site where he writes about the
> Star People, I came across the following quote: "The truth is that
> mankind was created by an advance race of people...." How does this
> fit in with the fact that we are creative parts of the One Infinite
> Creator?
>
That's easy. We are ALL ONE. There are multiple
dimensions(densities)in our existance. We live in the 3rd of 8. Those
beings(souls) who live in the higher levels of our octave(8 densities)
all have different jobs than the jobs we typically think of as
employment. Some of those entities(souls) have the responsibility of
preparing the way for those lower density entities(souls) and some of
them have the responsibility of transporting those entities(souls)
from planets(souls) which are moving into higher densities such as our
current planet which is moving into 4th density now. Or perhaps those
entities have destroyed their planet through conflict such as many of
us did on Mars and many others did on the planet that is now our
astroid belt. Something that always comes about from selfishness and
the quest for power over others. These Star Visitors are higher
density beings who are charged with the care of the the souls on our
planet. At the time we destroyed all life on Mars we were transported
to a temporary holding area until suitable bodies were developed here
on this planet by genetic engineering, for us to repeat our 3rd
density experience until we get it. Interestingly, this planet became
an experimental location in which 3rd density repeaters from many
different parts of our galaxy were incarnated.(incarcerated?
:)hmmm...) That has not worked out well due to increased tensions
between the varying races resulting in extreme racism and differences
in ideologies. That is why there will be few qualifying for harvest.
The power struggle continues between the positives and the negatives,
and racism or idealogical intolerance always raises it's ugly head.
Because of our educational and religous systems (concealed corporate
programming) it is very difficult to overcome these problems. So, they
didn't create us, they assisted in the creation of our physical
representations here on this planet, and indeed on ANY planet.

Peace and love of the One,

James Stephens

Ed
08-18-2006, 09:11 AM
Re: ET assistance

Posted by: "William Mount" wmeuropa@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=QjfV-7oPvs4JBOi4moXzTGWsdj0QQG7ec9AqP_mCTMAN1aIo9T27J8W JJBNjog326Tk12som78Vx6juA) wmeuropa

Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:32 am (PST)

--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=CqzyU7IVUBgU8BbWw3umRq-9kBigmncHW162mFO5PDXnFTdlc9e9NPE0fPr4_WjucDRa_ronD 3pNWvfKBg3n), "jpstephens2012"
<jpstephenslives@...>
wrote:
>
> Great post Seth. Check out this link to the Web site of Dr.
Richard
> Boylan: http://www.drboylan.com/snpressrelease.html if you
aren't
> aware of it already. I'm having a great time in my awakening.
I've
> discovered things that thrill me to death and things that scare
the
> hell out of me such as Lt. Col. Tom Bearden's site. But all in
all
> It's being a hell of a ride! :)
>
In checking out Dr Richard Boylan Web site where he writes about
the
Star People, I came across the following quote: "The truth is
that
mankind was created by an advance race of people...." How does
this
fit in with the fact that we are creative parts of the One
Infinite
Creator?

My reply (man, this new Yahoo system is a drag since it won't
quote posts properly :(

Boylan is saying that our physical plane bodies were created
by
intelligent ETs. In other words, homo sapiens just didn't happen by
accidental evolution in the primates. ETs were involved with genetic
manipulation and breeding programs much like what we do with dogs or
horses, etc., except at a much more sophisticated level. Our souls are
creative parts of the One Infinite Creator, and our bodies are too,
but the body is just a 2D animal without the soul directing it.

All the best, Ed

jeffreykiksit
08-18-2006, 05:11 PM
--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=6f_lOrfdIFysn7R6-fhS_l3cDMe3b3-XN5QYCWP1CchHtjGJfLvMuNmQ6_Z_Kkd1ljeJ0ytgvhjeAWZLN k6TXw), Ed <metasyn@...> wrote:
>
> Boylan is saying that our physical plane bodies were created
> by
> intelligent ETs. In other words, homo sapiens just didn't happen by
> accidental evolution in the primates. ETs were involved with genetic
> manipulation and breeding programs much like what we do with dogs or
> horses, etc., except at a much more sophisticated level. Our souls are
> creative parts of the One Infinite Creator, and our bodies are too,
> but the body is just a 2D animal without the soul directing it.
> All the best, Ed
_________________________________________________
Just for the record I dont have a problem with that logic, the same concept has
been put
forth in the past. Its just the way he steals legitimate New Age concepts and
tries to make
them his own and put his own ego right in the middle of the story. Anyone who
has read a
lot of New Age books can easily write "spiritual fiction." But when you pass
off fiction as
reality that is dishonest. ITs confusing because authors very often mix
legitimate new age
concepts with their own fiction. See you in the 11th dimension.....