Ra symbol in new crop circle?

[OzarkMark]

Hi All,

This new crop circle appears to be a circular version of Ra's winged disc symbol
surrounded by a Mayan calendar-type of circle. It's worth a look no matter what
you think about crop circles. Is Ra communicating his presence to the world?
http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2004/silburyhill2/silburyhill2004b.html

I'm having great fun! -Mark

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Filip Van Droogenbroeck]

Hi Mark

If you look at the explenation on the site then it says it was made in
2 days.
Wich most of the time points to hoaxers.
And with the stuff they found on the site little card bords with
numbers is more stuff pointing in that direction.
I would love to see some research on the plants and the ground and see
if they find any biophysical anomalies. For me that's the best proof
that it's not made by some people with sticks and rope.

peace and joy
filip

--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=toqKMvdnGXjjbOfNAd6RSgv5qJenzdfBq37mqF 97BpCJQWnBkMCnv4ud3tk2PtVYdjiEw9dMKOLK7ycp), "OzarkMark" <ozarkmark@t...> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This new crop circle appears to be a circular version of Ra's winged
disc symbol surrounded by a Mayan calendar-type of circle. It's worth
a look no matter what you think about crop circles. Is Ra
communicating his presence to the world?
http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2004/silburyhill2/silburyhill2004b.html
>
> I'm having great fun! -Mark
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[William Bombardier]

Hello Filip,

Biophysical anomalies would definitely be nice, but there are some
physical signs that point to this as a genuine crop formation. The
center spirals are tightly nested with interlocking crop stems which is
impossible to fake without damaging the crop. Some of the reports that
I have been following by researchers inspecting the ground lay are
reporting mixed results. From what I've heard it appears that someone
may be trying to make this "appear" to be hoaxed. The markers that
were found are small disks that would lay on the ground. How would
they be useful for hoaxing if you can't see then (i.e. it's dark at
night and they lay well below the field of view until you're right on
top of them.)? One might also ask about the location (right next to
Silbury Hill) which is pretty well watched.
My personal opinion is that this is a genuine formation, but it's
beautiful to behold whomever is responsible :?)

For some closeups of the plant lay, have a look at
http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2004/silburyhill2/
silburyhill2004b.html

Peace.

Will
_________________________________________________
Remember, we become that which we choose to be.


On Aug 13, 2004, at 4:11 PM, Filip Van Droogenbroeck wrote:

> Hi Mark
>
> If you look at the explenation on the site then it says it was made in
> 2 days.
> Wich most of the time points to hoaxers.
> And with the stuff they found on the site little card bords with
> numbers is more stuff pointing in that direction.
> I would love to see some research on the plants and the ground and see
> if they find any biophysical anomalies. For me that's the best proof
> that it's not made by some people with sticks and rope.
>
> peace and joy
> filip


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[kimonokraken]

Doesn't it say at the bottom of the page that there is loads of
evidence of human construction? This isn't to say that there aren't
alien crop circles, just that this one looks like it isn't. I'm
aware there are anomalies surrounding genuine crop circles, various
signs of autheticity.

Namaste,

Graeme

--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=e_jF9XdRyORqLx3di-YiU7QBVffQ9yt3IP_0w7HCZ_xSN9t8ngyGC0X9oSAb-0mIxrh83L-4CB1rBsA9D9c), "OzarkMark" <ozarkmark@t...> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This new crop circle appears to be a circular version of Ra's
winged disc symbol surrounded by a Mayan calendar-type of circle.
It's worth a look no matter what you think about crop circles. Is Ra
communicating his presence to the world?
http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2004/silburyhill2/silburyhill2004b.
html
>
> I'm having great fun! -Mark
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[kimonokraken]

Good points there. I'd love it to be genuine.

Graeme

--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=-ThYHKKsNarcyf4-jhbqtxfnqnAPjp8A5ic5D_s-XHj0xX3MVWbnSnnRc7pI6-CsuNh1ygMLGY4BSS8c1qCJOw), William Bombardier <wjbombo@e...> wrote:
> Hello Filip,
>
> Biophysical anomalies would definitely be nice, but there are some
> physical signs that point to this as a genuine crop formation.
The
> center spirals are tightly nested with interlocking crop stems
which is
> impossible to fake without damaging the crop. Some of the reports
that
> I have been following by researchers inspecting the ground lay are
> reporting mixed results. From what I've heard it appears that
someone
> may be trying to make this "appear" to be hoaxed. The markers
that
> were found are small disks that would lay on the ground. How
would
> they be useful for hoaxing if you can't see then (i.e. it's dark
at
> night and they lay well below the field of view until you're right
on
> top of them.)? One might also ask about the location (right next
to
> Silbury Hill) which is pretty well watched.
> My personal opinion is that this is a genuine formation, but it's
> beautiful to behold whomever is responsible :?)
>
> For some closeups of the plant lay, have a look at
> http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2004/silburyhill2/
> silburyhill2004b.html
>
> Peace.
>
> Will
> _________________________________________________
> Remember, we become that which we choose to be.
>
>
> On Aug 13, 2004, at 4:11 PM, Filip Van Droogenbroeck wrote:
>
> > Hi Mark
> >
> > If you look at the explenation on the site then it says it was
made in
> > 2 days.
> > Wich most of the time points to hoaxers.
> > And with the stuff they found on the site little card bords with
> > numbers is more stuff pointing in that direction.
> > I would love to see some research on the plants and the ground
and see
> > if they find any biophysical anomalies. For me that's the best
proof
> > that it's not made by some people with sticks and rope.
> >
> > peace and joy
> > filip
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[William Bombardier]

Well, as far as I've researched into the phenomenon (which is
extensive), humans/hoaxers still aren't capable of creating nests such
as this...

http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2004/silburyhill2/DSCF2174.jpg


Additionally, information has been encoded into the formation... Here's
a summary of the information that has been decoded:

"Summary: Two different Mayan-Aztec calendar schemes are encoded in the
diagram, leaving no possibility for error.
The outer dial counts time as 52 x 10 x 10 =5200, and uses a set of
six fine lines near any shaded area for greater accuracy, namely 52 / 6
= 8.67.
The inner hands count time as 12 x 20 x 20 or 12.0.0, since 13 x 20 x
20 = 13.0.0 = 5200 has not yet been reached.
Because the information provided in both parts is redundant, we can be
sure that the interpretation is correct. In other words, "the end of
the Fourth Sun is near and on schedule". An incredibly clever scheme
of pictorial mathematics.

C. Lewis"

Here's the link for the whole page in case anyone missed it:

http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2004/silburyhill2/
silburyhill2004b.html

If hoaxers are going to this length to "encode" their formations with
information such as this, there is an equally unusual mystery going on
IMHO.

Peace,

Will

_________________________________________________
Remember, we become that which we choose to be.



On Aug 15, 2004, at 4:55 PM, kimonokraken wrote:

> Doesn't it say at the bottom of the page that there is loads of
> evidence of human construction? This isn't to say that there aren't
> alien crop circles, just that this one looks like it isn't. I'm
> aware there are anomalies surrounding genuine crop circles, various
> signs of autheticity.
>
> Namaste,
>
> Graeme