PDA

View Full Version : Nature of Distortion (part 1 of 2)


ZPC
12-10-2004, 07:55 PM
Zee here: (To post to the asc2k message board I needed to divide this document
into 2 parts, part 1 and part 2.
It can also be found in its entirety, with format intact,
at the ECOphysics group.)

The Nature of the Distortion
and Illusion of Physical Reality

Surfaces

A surface is a statistic.

Form is characterized by surfaces.

Our senses specialize in surfaces.

The motion of a surface generates sound.

Surfaces reflect sound.

Surfaces reflect light. We touch surfaces.

Our perceptions are the product

of combining sensing and knowing.

Form has the function of bounding or defining.



Objectivity

Our so-called objective reality isn?t objective.

We change what we observe in the process of observing it.



Science

Science, another word for knowing,

has made it possible

for us to augment or extend our senses.

We can magnify.

We can magnify the distant with telescopes.

We can magnify the small with microscopes.

We can magnify by using shorter wavelengths (ultra-violet).

We can magnify and penetrate

by using really short wavelengths (x-rays).

We can translate one kind of image

into another kind of image.

This translation of images

makes some kinds of perception possible.



Real

Distortion occurs, when we believe

that what we sense is real.

Distortion occurs, when we believe

we derive our beliefs from our experiences.



Actually, we derive our experiences

from our beliefs.



Questions

The nature and the function of questions

affects our beliefs.

Questions select a set of components or elements

and pose the nature of their relationships.



It is possible to fail to include

the connecting, linking or relating

components or elements in the question.

When we fail in our inclusion

of connecting, linking or relating components or elements

we have dysfunctional questions and distortion.

Our questions may pose too few relationships.

Our questions may pose the wrong nature of relatedness.



Knowing

How does an entity know anything

about something other than itself

or even about itself?

What is knowing?
Often it is only representational.

Representational knowing only provides for

sample observational input.

Yet, reality is in a flux of continuous change.

We ignore or neglect the continuous change

in our sample observation.



It is at this juncture that the nature of consciousness

provides the breakthrough.

Con-science is literally knowing-together-with,

that is, con-science is the simultaneous

observation of the knower and what he knows.



Con-sciousness involves simultaneous

self referencing and other-than-self referencing.

This simultaneous self referencing and other than self referencing

is achieved by means of a coemissive fundamental.



Pairs Which Coemit

We know that photons emit in pairs.

Allain Aspect, from the University of Paris, South,

explored the Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen (EPR) theorem

by separating the photon pair with mirrors1.

When the two photons were 12 meters apart

he polarized the one.

The second photon, in billionths of a second,

responded, as though connected,

in dimensions other than space and time.

That connection of the pair of photons

is the coemissive fundamental

out of which our physical reality is made.



{ . . . to be continued in Part 2 . . . }



ÃÂà ƒÂ‚Ã‚Â‚ÃƒÂƒÃ‚ÂƒÃƒÂ‚Ã‚Â‚Ãƒ ƒÂ‚© 2004, ECOhealth / Z. P. Charnoe




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]