Dewey Larson

[Gopi Krishna]

Dear group,
It'll be great if anyone would take the time to clear up some
confusions here...
As everyone of you knows,Ra mentioned the discoveries of Dewey
Larson as something that was accurate enough as far as third
density is concerned.When going through his arguments,we come
across the concept of space time progression.The treatment of
space and time as aspects of vibration [each in 3 dimensions] goes
on extremely well,however,I am stuck at two points:

1.Is it true that even time is a vibration of aether??What is the
connection between the flow of aether and its vibration??I mean,aren't
only one of the two actually possible,or are we talking about vibrational
geometries of time flowing with the aether??Or have I got it all wrong..?
:)

2.When dealing with frequency,Larson declares that what we call frequency
is actually a VELOCITY,with dimensions s/t,space/time.[A New Light On
Space and Time] I admit that this is way beyond my understanding,and even
seems to conflict with the usual treatment of the word frequency in the
ascension website.What's going on???

With lotsa thanks,and love,

Gopi

[smileyjaiy]

Dear Gopi:
This may not answer your question and that you may already see this
but I have found it becomes simple when we change our notion of what
time really is...that is...time is but the perception of motion or
change which is both are one and the same...the tools used to measure
time are but their own motion relative to the events(motion/change)
which we measure them against...this is how the speed of light can
have different speeds in different densities. The speed of light may
vary from one density to another but within the same density remains
the same to the constituents of the same density. This is how time
travel is possible as well. There is no true absolute passage of time,
it is only an apparent phenomena...all past events to infinity and all
future events to infinity are but all infinity possible events
existing simultaneously at an infinitesimal moment. It is our
consciousness which focuses in on a potential through (in our case)
the instrument of the human body, that excludes all the other
concurrent potentials that give us this sense a universe and apparent
unique properties which appear to flow as a passage of time as we
consciously perceive one potential to the next hence the notion of the
passage of time. If you are able to bring your consciousness
completely out of perception until only consciousness is aware of
itself then you have the power to access any potential past or future
events. If you are able to extend that field of awareness to your
physical body as well such that your bodies rate of vibration changes
to infinite potential as well, then you would be able to 'precipitate'
into a different apparent past or future. Even if we hold on to the
notion that events only happen in linear fashion than where we have a
beginning of time and an end of time we have to ask 'well what about
before that or after that' then we see that even in linear terms it
becomes infinite and as such even statistically all events repeat
themselves eventually because there is an infinity of time in which to
play this out, such that travelling into the future is the same as
travelling into the past.
I know you didn't ask about time travel but I thought this exercise
in thinking might be useful in looking at vibration from another view
- Jaiyson Dillon

--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=HpnYqVYfR3pVreawKb9u_DZiTK0HFC-01y8PCAKcMqVsl6r-kF4zuUrqZjNOEC_e3do66vBlriK1OcgOl4_eLA), "Gopi Krishna" <gopiv@i...> wrote:
>
> Dear group,
> It'll be great if anyone would take the time to clear up
some
> confusions here...
> As everyone of you knows,Ra mentioned the discoveries of
Dewey
> Larson as something that was accurate enough as far as third
> density is concerned.When going through his arguments,we come
> across the concept of space time progression.The treatment of
> space and time as aspects of vibration [each in 3 dimensions] goes
> on extremely well,however,I am stuck at two points:
>
> 1.Is it true that even time is a vibration of aether??What is the
> connection between the flow of aether and its vibration??I mean,
aren't
> only one of the two actually possible,or are we talking about
vibrational
> geometries of time flowing with the aether??Or have I got it all
wrong..?
> :)
>
> 2.When dealing with frequency,Larson declares that what we call
frequency
> is actually a VELOCITY,with dimensions s/t,space/time.[A New Light
On
> Space and Time] I admit that this is way beyond my understanding,and
even
> seems to conflict with the usual treatment of the word frequency in
the
> ascension website.What's going on???
>
> With lotsa thanks,and love,
>
> Gopi