New Images Reveal Clouds On Planet Uranus

[Light Eye]

Dear Friends,

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/uranus_images_041110.html

Be Well, BE LOVE.

David




New Images Reveal Clouds on Planet Uranus
By SPACE.com Staff

posted: 10 November 2004
09:16 am ET

New images of the planet Uranus reveal more diversity in cloud features than
ever seen before.

The new images, from the Keck Telescope in Hawaii, provide insight into some of
the most enigmatic weather in the solar system, researchers said today at a
meeting of the Division for Planetary Sciences of the American Astronomical
Society.

"The cloud features range from small to large, from dim and diffuse to sharp and
bright, from rapidly evolving systems to stable features that last for years,"
said Lawrence Sromovsky of the University of Wisconsin-Madison's Space Science
and Engineering Center.

A large storm in the southern hemisphere seesaws over 5 degrees of latitude
during several years.

"It's weird behavior that hasn't been recognized before on Uranus," Sromovsky
said. "It's similar to what's been seen on Neptune, although there the
oscillation is much more rapid.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[David Wilcock]

From: Light Eye

Dear Friends,

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/uranus_images_041110.html

DW: This is great! None of the previous Uranus images have ever been
this clear - and the case for interplanetary climate change gets more
and more focused.

Notice the series of evenly-spaced straight lines, all along the same
latitude (which may well be 19.5 degrees South). This is a clear
giveaway of "nested" geometry - i.e. the same basic geometric form that
shows up in multiple positions, all harmonically interrelated. I'll bet
that you could calculate how many degrees of longitude separate each
center point of those lines, divide that number into 360 and come up
with something roundly harmonic - like 72, or 36x2. That would be my
first guess since you could probably fit about 20 of those straight
lines around the circumference, based on the spacing.

Peace be with you -

- David

[wubby gump]

Hi David.....

...I am a newcomer to this forum, & I admit to not
reading all of the postings thus far..(16 thousand
plus!?!)....however, after staying up last night
listening to Richard C. Hoagland all night/this
morning (I'm in Detroit) on C2C, I have more than a
few questions......I know you are busy with your work
& you "pop in" from time to time just to see what's
going on here. So, I'll try this out & attempt to be
brief on such an extensive subject. (Before I get
going, let me propose this to all whom are in the
forum, not just David) but I thought there was an
interesting link on Rense's site regarding Stan
Romanek's equations. Supposedly he was abducted & he
wrote down all of these formulas in the weeks
afterwards. I won't go into all the details, I'll just
give the link.......

http://www.rense.com/general46/stan1.html

...perhaps you or many others are familiar with all of
this. Perhaps not. I have not gone through all of the
messages on the forum & have yet to see anyone discuss
the subject (Sheesh! That's like reading "War And
Peace" three or four times in a row, right?!?) At any
rate there is a very bright woman whom has an on-line
"book" or "journal" regarding all of this & she
addresses just the subject of "sacred geometry."

http://members.aol.com/SeeingBelieving/Chapter14.html>Seeing
Is Believing - Chapter 14 - ORION

http://members.aol.com/SeeingBelieving/Chapter13.html>Seeing
Is Believing - Chapter 13 - 11:11

I find it interesting that she finds "geometry" in the
very subject of stargazing. This is someone who has no
prior experience in the field of mathematics or
astro-science. After viewing your website & subsequent
links....mathematics & geometry play a crucial role in
much of your work in the physical realm. Wesley Clark
was quoted as saying "it was all about doing the math"
not too long ago.......and based on your delving into
polyhedrons......what this woman has come up with in
regards to Orion & Giza.....what you have posted
online in regards to your work with Hoagland & the
discovery with things going on in our very own solar
system........the gentleman whom is researching the
"geometry" behind the writing of hebrew.....and even
the work of RA & the Law Of One......

...it's all about the math isn't it? If you can
squeeze in some time to talk about this (or anyone for
that matter), this would be wonderful to me and
everyone else on this forum.

A few questions.......

1) In the "Law Of One" series, there is only a brief
mentioning of Jesus Christ. If no-one has proposed
this question before, does his name in hebrew have any
"geometrical meaning?" Or, when written, does the name
"Yeshua" hold any type of significance?

2) Did he in fact exist as we can understand him or is
he an "energy force" beyond our comprehension?

3) In the first chapter of the "Law Of One" visitation
is discussed, citing the various times "Ra" & his race
had visited the planet. "The Confederation" is
mentioned.....what exactly is "The Confederation?"

4) In all of your travels, do you "see the math" in
everything? Does the interconnectedness of this
world/universe become ridiculously apparent? (I am
referring to the Hoagland/Wilcox model that the both
of you have presented online)

5) The light, the light, the light............what
about the dark? I was raised on the duality of life.
If there is anything that is congruent amongst the
major religions on this world is that there is light
and dark, good and bad, man and woman, yin and yang,
etc. Is there no opposite to the light? In the "Law Of
One" series.......this doesn't seem to be
discussed.......I am curious as to this concept that
we have of light & dark....but is not discussed in the
"Law Of One" series......"Lucifer" is described as
being the "Morningstar"....all major religions
acknowledge a being as such....does this have anything
to do with "The Confederation?"

6) Lastly (but not least!), we talk immensely about
"the math"...."the geometry" in all of this....Richard
C. Hoagland's work, Eugene Mallove's (R.I.P.) work,
David Wilcox's work/study, etc......& the theory has
been posited of a "design".....all this math....things
spinning....etcetera......what about the opposite of
all of that? I am taking my previous question a bit
farther. If the solar system as we know and understand
it is "designed" in such a way....everything in it's
particular place............what about the opposite?
What about the in-between? If something spins to the
right, what about the force of the left? It is
difficult to understand "the geometry" or "the math"
behind the structure of it all, without an opposing
force to reckon with.......are these the "extra
dimesnsions" in string theory that they have not
accounted for? Does Ra have an antithesis? What works
against "The Confederation?"

Obviously, I have more than six questions here, but I
think you get my point(s).......I would love to hear
from you specifically David, but anyone & everyone is
welcome to respond....I welcome all discussion. It can
only lead to enlightenment......no pun intended!

Thank you to all who respond and i wish you well in
all that you do.....

~ Thomas

--- David Wilcock <djw333@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=8aO8bvzQ21R2UJiZXukKhn4KVKzFLrr_fvClu7 HY7GHTaiOkG2b0gNjT5gTUBybJwZWJwafliiIbg-nPSQ)> wrote:

> DW: This is great! None of the previous Uranus
> images have ever been this clear - and the case for interplanetary climate
> change gets more and more focused.
>
> Notice the series of evenly-spaced straight lines,
> all along the same
> latitude (which may well be 19.5 degrees South).
> > Peace be with you -
>
> - David

[bjorn_nitmou]

I am afraid the great Canadian Artist and Guitar Master David Wilcox
will most likely not respond to any of your questions, in fact Im not
even aware that he is a member of this forum. But you could check
out his offical website www.davidwilcox.com, and maybe pose these
questions to him there, good luck.

--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=aOh04JAVob8pbib7lrhtU-OLB7wHiBBFJF_4LJXnak3RXe14BKsjesqzGesp50vKVqPSOuRV NN7-6U0U), wubby gump <wubbygump@y...> wrote:
>
> Hi David.....
> (I am
> referring to the Hoagland/Wilcox model that the both
> of you have presented online)

[Steve & Jennifer]

--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=8dqN7R2bxmrEQR8XsmPKpqYFJmoQlx4qJc0-tF0yBAjhhCYH1yN6OzvQtfcJnYb3l766sXvIVNHcqcypU0Jv), "bjorn_nitmou" <bjorn_nitmou@y...>
wrote:

> I am afraid the great Canadian Artist and Guitar Master David
> Wilcox will most likely not respond to any of your questions, in
> fact Im not even aware that he is a member of this forum.

Perhaps not. But David WILCOCK participates here all the time
(message #16310, for example)! In fact, I've always been under the
impression that he was the owner, although, I could be mistaken
about that.

~ S

[Steve & Jennifer]

Greetings, W G ~

This is just a partial response to your post regarding question #6.

As we all know, this third density physicality is a realm of duality
in which everything about it exists in opposite values. It's where,
through self-imposed amnesia, the illusion of fragmentation and
separation from Oneness is able to be explored. I think a commmon
mistake people often make is that of projecting this duality into
other realms of existence, whereas, it's my understanding that this
is a very unique experiment that we are all participating in. In
other words if ya wanna play in the dark, ya gotta come here!

In that regard, I would think that Ra probably doesn't have an
antithesis per se. Of course, I could be completely out to lunch
with that assumption!

Anybody have any other thoughts on this?...

~ Steve

[grantcleveland]

Hey,

I thought David Wilcock was supposed to look like Edgar Casey. He
doesn't look like Casey to me! :-)


--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=_K2dJdg-nlm9BsRZOR7C4ffyvhtvbl1o-SxspW53k5ita1YLZGP41JDGEVqFtUdL9WphWq8Iqwl1HFZe-14_rQ), "bjorn_nitmou" <bjorn_nitmou@y...>
wrote:
>
> I am afraid the great Canadian Artist and Guitar Master David
Wilcox
> will most likely not respond to any of your questions, in fact Im
not
> even aware that he is a member of this forum. But you could check
> out his offical website www.davidwilcox.com, and maybe pose these
> questions to him there, good luck.
>
> --- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=_K2dJdg-nlm9BsRZOR7C4ffyvhtvbl1o-SxspW53k5ita1YLZGP41JDGEVqFtUdL9WphWq8Iqwl1HFZe-14_rQ), wubby gump <wubbygump@y...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi David.....
> > (I am
> > referring to the Hoagland/Wilcox model that the both
> > of you have presented online)

[bjorn_nitmou]

Wouldn't it be cool if they got together on a musical collaboration?
At a minimum they would at least confuse the heck out of everyone.

--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=E34NgMaUdgsEaiNWc1eQQFtltaF8ildVmcg85B B3jcORIZSdb4NImbnXFk-hH6-TfkoNbqJX1uhfDhYp3w), "grantcleveland"
<grant_a_cleveland@p...> wrote:
>
>
> Hey,
>
> I thought David Wilcock was supposed to look like Edgar Casey. He
> doesn't look like Casey to me! :-)
>
>
> --- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=E34NgMaUdgsEaiNWc1eQQFtltaF8ildVmcg85B B3jcORIZSdb4NImbnXFk-hH6-TfkoNbqJX1uhfDhYp3w), "bjorn_nitmou" <bjorn_nitmou@y...>
> wrote:
> >
> > I am afraid the great Canadian Artist and Guitar Master David
> Wilcox
> > will most likely not respond to any of your questions, in fact Im
> not
> > even aware that he is a member of this forum. But you could
check
> > out his offical website www.davidwilcox.com, and maybe pose these
> > questions to him there, good luck.
> >
> > --- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=E34NgMaUdgsEaiNWc1eQQFtltaF8ildVmcg85B B3jcORIZSdb4NImbnXFk-hH6-TfkoNbqJX1uhfDhYp3w), wubby gump <wubbygump@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi David.....
> > > (I am
> > > referring to the Hoagland/Wilcox model that the both
> > > of you have presented online)

[GenoNess1@...]

In a message dated 11/13/2004 1:14:52 PM Pacific Standard Time,
bjorn_nitmou@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=bksXY_TbbKoKRhf0idYY9I8jEhNm6ReziVHraf jp_OcUfg_IZMwcsh_HbX8Zdp-4usPYIjMQzZjO7cPJJ9p9) writes:
Wouldn't it be cool if they got together on a musical collaboration?


At a minimum they would at least confuse the heck out of everyone.
hahahahahahahahaha


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Chris Hamilton]

Hello Thomas (does that equate to doubting:)? Just joking. Anyway, I have
been pretty busy of late, but I have wanted to answer some of your
questions, which were pretty darn good for Law of One studies. I will try to
answer some questions. With other questions, possibly our excellent
Phi-loso-Phi-zers in our group can jump in.

My strong points seem to be as a researcher in the LOO studies. In this way
I can help someone interested in Unity Consciousness find the pieces of LOO
that resonate in their life best. As this site studies the LL Research Law
of One Books, I can try to help all of you with my research. However, I tend
to need support in other areas ;) I'm not the greatest about deciphering .
Others, like Jeremy are much better with interpretation. So, with that, I
will try to answer what I can of your original questions.

And, of course, I am hoping all of you are here to study our work towards
Unity Consciousness, by reading the Law of One Series. They are available
online, free of charge in their entirety, from the LL Research Group.
Although you CAN buy them too :). David also has an LOO outline on his site
that is very good and helps one understand better, as LOO can be a difficult
read. But, LOO is the basis for some of David's ideas, so it is definately
integral to this site. And, on that note, I will answer a few of Thomas'
questions :) Love and Light to all, Chris

T: I am a newcomer to this forum, & I admit to not
> reading all of the postings thus far..(16 thousand plus!?!)....

C: A simple search should help you here, although I admit, the site can
appear daunting...let's say we want to explore music and vibration...just
key in 'music' into the search..or we want vibrational geometry, or the
Confederation....the search button can bring up alot on Asc2k....AND on the
LL Research page too.

T: 1) In the "Law Of One" series, there is only a brief
> mentioning of Jesus Christ. If no-one has proposed
> this question before, does his name in hebrew have any
> "geometrical meaning?" Or, when written, does the name "Yeshua" hold any
> type of significance?

C: The Law of One Books do not address language or writing from a a
vibrational aspect, although vibration is integral in explanations to get us
to understand the unifying aspects of The LOO. Individuals (including Jesus)
were only mentioned when the questions were specifically addressed that way.

T: 3) In the first chapter of the "Law Of One" visitation
> is discussed, citing the various times "Ra" & his race
> had visited the planet. "The Confederation" is
> mentioned.....what exactly is "The Confederation?"

C: This is an excellent search question, especially at www.llreasearch.org .
Go to the site, find 'search' on the left side of the page and then key in
'Confederation' in the search box. There is a ton of reading from that.
>
T: 4) In all of your travels, do you "see the math" in
> everything? Does the interconnectedness of this
> world/universe become ridiculously apparent?

C: Well, I can't speak for everyone else, but I sure do :). Plus, if you
study the LOO and David's work, you will see how David's theories are molded
around the LOO writings.

T: 5) The light, the light, the light............what about the dark? In
the "Law Of One" series.......this doesn't seem to be discussed

C: Oh yes!!! LOO discusses our duality and our choice to experience it in
3D....that is the purpose of the books...to help us see the duality and work
with it while we are here. If we work on it, then maybe we will see that
everything really IS One :).

T: 6) Lastly (but not least!), we talk immensely about
> "the math"...."the geometry" in all of this....Richard
> C. Hoagland's work, Eugene Mallove's (R.I.P.) work,
> David Wilco[ck]'s work/study, etc......& the theory has
> been posited of a "design".....all this math....things
> spinning....etcetera......what about the opposite of
> all of that?

C: If you read about David's toroidal energy, it may bring to mind an hour
glass with two ends, which would explain your 'opposite' of all that:)
However, you must also understand that, because we are creatures who have
opposites, we will not be able to perceive a 3D without them. This last
question could really blossom if anyone wants to continue it, so I will take
my leave and see if anyone wants to explore The LOO and its attempt at
explaining Unity, even tho we as humans can be pretty myopic in this
regard:)