Moderator Stuff

[Chris Hamilton]

Just a few notes about the moderation duties and rules and things. I have had
some people unhappy with my decision to reject a few posts. By "a few", I really
mean that literally, as there are relatively very few rejected for content. I
try to be fair in my decision, and if I want to reject a post, I will contact
David with this. I have been accused of being Sts, self-serving, power-crazy,
you name it:) But, the fact is, is that I am here to enforce the rules while
still being fair. I could delete posts without notifying David, but I don't do
that because my reasons for rejection may not be important for David. So, we
work together on this, and, hopefully, retain our purpose in studying Ra and
David's work. I have even reversed a decision on occasion, even after DW
concurred, so I really do try to be fair. Just being a moderator puts you in a
position where you have to judge an email as worthwhile or not in context of our
group's purpose, so many get mad at me simply because I have to do this. When I
do reject, I try to give precise reasons as to why, and these are in the reject
notification the poster will recieve back. If you do see a reject from Asc2k in
your Inbox, please just don't delete it, but open it and find out why I rejected
it:)

This brings me to basic processes that can make everyone's enjoyment of the site
better in technical terms. We all should have read the rules when we joined, and
they automatically post too. But, as courtesy to your group, when you send a
post, please delete as much of the post you are commenting on as possible and
still retain the original intent. Also take out the old ads on the bottom and
clean up whatever you can so others have an easier read. One other point is that
we do not accept attachments, so I believe font color as an option is also lost.
So, if you have made your remarks blue and the other person's black, all you
will see is black when it posts. This makes it difficult to tell who is saying
what, so my suggestion is to put initials in front of your remarks and who you
are talking to, like Gail did in her last post.

Thank you all for listening. Chris

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Stephen Tyman]

Thank you for your honest efforts as moderator, Chris. From where I sit you
seem to be doing an excellent job. As for taking the inevitable flack
associated with the job, I say: Better you than me! A service to self response.
Mayhaps. But some STS is necessary for survival, eh? I know from long
experience that tough love is always the hardest love to give. Lo/Li Stephen

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Jason Wharton]

Chris, I think you already know this, but I totally appreciate how you
handled my particular instance. I'd say you are totally forgiven but there
is nothing to forgive. I knew I only had a limited view of what was going on
and when you shared with me the bigger picture you had in view it made
perfect sense. Keep up the great work!

Kind regards,
Jason Wharton


Thanks Jason. I just want us all to feel as One, ya know? :) And, I never make a
reject decision based upon my biases (or try not to), but I ask, would Ra say
this is part of the LoO discussion, or is it transient and superfluous, or could
intrinsically harm others or dampen the idea of love? That's what I "do", smile.
Chris

[Chris]

Hello all of you searchers who have found David Wilcock's site:). I
am one of the moderators...Light Eye is also pivotal and we get
moderator Jeremy contributing once in a while. We have had a great
deal of activity and joining, and with all this activity, I want to
remind everyone of how we can help each other and also enable the
site to be what you want it to be and still remain within DW's
guidelines.

First, please read the rules posted in the files section. This will
tell you many things about post length, cleaning up dead text, and
posts that can be sent privately, like what I call 'atta boy
posts':). These posts congratulate the other person, and really can
be sent privately, although they are really nice:). Shortening our
posts by utilizing these procedures shows consideration for others
and is always welcome when you take a few extra minutes to shorten
and consolidate your responses.

Second, our site utilizes the LoO (Law of One) Material from the LL
Research site as a basis for our self-discovery that we are all One,
yet human simultaneously...AND also utilizes David Wilcock's self-
discovery and written words. We ask that if you wish to discuss
other channelled work or other psychological help sites, that you
tie them in with the LoO or Wilcock information. Simply stating that
your information is interesting may not be enough here, so expect
some moderator activity in this respect. This is understandable, as
we believe here that the LoO provides a very good basis for personal
improvement. We also admire David's universal and spiritual
observations. This site's purpose is to meld the two and, from
these, we can all come to some conclusion as to our purpose here in
the physical 3D and what we can do about 4D issues.

As I always have a positive attitude about our "newbies" on the
site, I am positive that you will all strive to follow the
guidelines here in respect for the others on the site. We all want
to learn in a supportive, friendly atmosphere...so let us do that.
Welcome new and old. Chris