Question regarding free-will and the Law of Confusion

[Arthur Thomas]

Hello all,
I have noticed in various spots in the Ra and Q'uo transcripts
that those of Ra and/or Q'uo do not actually answer certain
questions; often mentioning the Law of Confusion or infringement on
free-will. I was wondering if someone could clarify this for me. I
have also wondered about some of these questions that were not
answered. To me I think that when a questioner asks a question in a
channeling session they are expressing their free-will to have the
question answered. Is it possible that those of Ra/Q'uo also want
to be avoided as being revered as "gods" and decide to refrain from
answering certain questions? Thank you to any or all who will
respond.
Peace be with you all,
Artie

[Erik]

Hello all,
I have noticed in various spots in the Ra and Q'uo transcripts
that those of Ra and/or Q'uo do not actually answer certain
questions; often mentioning the Law of Confusion or infringement on
free-will. I was wondering if someone could clarify this for me. I
have also wondered about some of these questions that were not
answered. To me I think that when a questioner asks a question in a
channeling session they are expressing their free-will to have the
question answered. Is it possible that those of Ra/Q'uo also want
to be avoided as being revered as "gods" and decide to refrain from
answering certain questions? Thank you to any or all who will
respond.
Artie

Erik: Imo, Quo ( Ra is a part of Quo) always scans the minds of those asking the
questions, added with there Love/Wisdom to decern if there answer might infringe
the First Distortion, the Law of Free-Will.
Our free-will is not based upon our personality-shells only, but upon our Higher
Self also.
If they decide/judge that there answer will inflict more infringement than
service they will leave it at that.
They, ( can we believe it, since they is us) know our "travel" plans and they
understand that some questions MAKE the questioner breached.

An example would be:

Quo, am I a wanderer?
They scan your mind and see you dont have any idea.
They know you are ( or are not) and simply answer the question.

THEN... you have forever been breached in your free-will and since we are all
One, they collect the karma and you end up being something else than before
there answer.

Quo will seek to guide us, serve us, but i believe will NEVER take away "you are
Creating your own reality" abilities, so to speak :).

Hope i made sense,
Erik.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[GenoNess1@...]

In a message dated 8/9/2004 2:36:48 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
e.strasser@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=QX-yM0tQZbLJJqqHzLhcz0_2iuagD3azTBZ-2R7lLsXHYcCIz1s0m0jG9-X8l6iQOwE284jekz1LkSQwAPTpNw) writes:
THEN... you have forever been breached in your free-will and since we are all
One, they collect the karma and you end up being something else than before
there answer.

Quo will seek to guide us, serve us, but i believe will NEVER take away "you
are Creating your own reality" abilities, so to speak :).

Hope i made sense,
Erik.



I can't get into this idea.
I have stated before that I simply don't believe it is possible to breach
free-will. it is not a guideline, it is an aspect of existence. I know what you
mean when you say that 'giving' us the answers would be in essence robbing us
of our personal power...but we are all ONE! yes I am one with Quo. Quo is one
with you. If Quo told you an answer to a question you had, and that changed
your perception, is that ANY different than my writing this letter to you? Quo
is
making a CONSCIOUS CHOICE not to volunteer specific information and that is
thier will. they could just as easily make a different choice, and that would
be thier will. So, in your fervor to maintain your 'free-will', are you not
infringing on the 'free-will' of Quo, who may want to give you said information?
I think taht the rythems and cycles of consciousness define the CHOICES that
entities make, and therefore they say that 'confusion' will be caused if they
make certain choices, but then, all CHOICES are ONE as well. Basically I'm
saying that its practically irrelevent.

What you said definitely made sense to me. don't get me wrong about that. Or
do, its your choice, heheheh. But what I'm saying is that, if we live in a
linear scope of reality, then if our 'free-will' is breached then it was MEANT
to
be breached, before it even happened - therefore nothing was actually
breached - that choice has been made already, for all of existence. I will try
to put
this into even greater context - if you have seen the Matrix movies this will
make a lot of sense, if not, they are still very good and to teh point --
there is the part where Neo first meets the Oracle, who supposedly can forsee
the
future. basically an enlightened non-linear being. she says, "Don't worry
about the vase" when he walks in. He says, "huh?" turns around to *see what she
is talking about* and knocks over a vase. He says I'm sorry, she says I told
you not to worry about it, and then, "Whats really going to wet your noodle
later is, would you still have broken it if I hadn't said anything?". In the 2nd
movie, the same 2 characters are talking on a park bench. The Oracle reveals a
very interesting thought in this scene - Neo says at one point, "Are you
saying I will have to choose whether she lives or dies?" and she says, "No,
you've
already made the choice. You're here to understand it." The extent to which
you understand yourself defines how much you understand your choices. thinking
you are going to infringe upon anothers free will is a result of not
understanding the nature of the ONE CONSCIOUSNESS shared by the subjects
involved. free
will has already been broken - it is limitation of consciousness. and even
that is an illusion. I hope this all is coherent enough. Love, Kyle!


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[lealdragon]

I agree and would like to add also that they take into consideration
others who will read the answer to the question, not just the questioner.

--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=kFB3zxt63vPc92Q-n-JpNyBDjtmED83QQp9pQm5SpRTBtQ6-I0aV9ykQd8jJEz-ug5IcvRsSdPzQFXA6), "Erik" <e.strasser@w...> wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have noticed in various spots in the Ra and Q'uo transcripts
> that those of Ra and/or Q'uo do not actually answer certain
> questions; often mentioning the Law of Confusion or infringement on
> free-will. I was wondering if someone could clarify this for me. I
> have also wondered about some of these questions that were not
> answered. To me I think that when a questioner asks a question in a
> channeling session they are expressing their free-will to have the
> question answered. Is it possible that those of Ra/Q'uo also want
> to be avoided as being revered as "gods" and decide to refrain from
> answering certain questions? Thank you to any or all who will
> respond.
> Artie
>
> Erik: Imo, Quo ( Ra is a part of Quo) always scans the minds of
those asking the questions, added with there Love/Wisdom to decern if
there answer might infringe the First Distortion, the Law of Free-Will.
> Our free-will is not based upon our personality-shells only, but
upon our Higher Self also.
> If they decide/judge that there answer will inflict more
infringement than service they will leave it at that.
> They, ( can we believe it, since they is us) know our "travel" plans
and they understand that some questions MAKE the questioner breached.
>
> An example would be:
>
> Quo, am I a wanderer?
> They scan your mind and see you dont have any idea.
> They know you are ( or are not) and simply answer the question.
>
> THEN... you have forever been breached in your free-will and since
we are all One, they collect the karma and you end up being something
else than before there answer.
>
> Quo will seek to guide us, serve us, but i believe will NEVER take
away "you are Creating your own reality" abilities, so to speak :).
>
> Hope i made sense,
> Erik.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[GenoNess1@...]

In a message dated 8/10/2004 6:11:09 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
GenoNess1@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=YAXO6iCFHFBtnnVq-QkMl8Togv1b4AYN2tozAo6yWy_odPHnd6pcNT4njeoghMoFzFw 5oBeXyAgCwGw) writes:
I think taht the rythems and cycles of consciousness define the CHOICES that
entities make, and therefore they say that 'confusion' will be caused if they
make certain choices, but then, all CHOICES are ONE as well.


By the way, what I meant about this is that thr rhythms and cycles of
consciousness and 'phases' of energy and existence define the choices that are
made
by a consciousness of a certain 'phase', and so if a consciousness that is
aware of this particular aspect of reality, then it knows that certain choices
are
to be made based on the 'phase' of the consciousness it is making contact
with, therefore it can only make certain choices that ALIGN with that particular
phase. So what i think is that Quo, or any other entity, that is divulging
only CERTAIN aspects of information are doing so because of the momentum or
current of the current cycle of consciousness. and to bring choices from
different
cycles of creation would bring about a sort of an 'off-beat' structure to the
current rhythm. does that make sense to anyone? I think its a great idea. much
exploring for me to do here. Love, Kyle!


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]