Anne Heche Interview

[Bake111@...]

<font face="arial,helvetica"><font size="3">hi rosi,

yes, i saw the anne hecke interview and i thought it was great! it was
fascinating. as she described her "other personality" and describing herself
as "crazy" i kept thinking no, you are not crazy, you are just
multidimensional!
i was wondering what her psychologist said about the other personality but
she never told him about it. i don't know what kind of mental illness
diagnosis that she would fall under since she was fully functional and
coherant in the 3d world, yet had this "fantasy" life in her head. so, to my
understanding, that would not be schizophrenia nor bipolar. i am not sure if
that would be considered "dissassociative disorder" since usually the
dissassociative disorder is for more than one personality split.

i am getting ready to order her book. again, that was one of the best
celebrity interviews i have ever seen. i am so glad i got to see it.



jane</font>

[Rosi]

did anyone see the interview with anne heche last night on barbara
walters?

she spoke of having a split personality which developed after years
of abuse by her father. her second identity being that of a person
called celestia that was 4th density. this identity could speak
another language. she seemed really confused about what this meant
to her, and felt that she was crazy.

i'm just curious if anyone saw this broadcast. i actually was really
excited by her interview. primarily because someone of such high
visibility to the general public, was talking about other planes of
consciousness on national television.

did anyone see this, and if so, any comments?

love and light!
rosi

[Rosi]

--- in asc2k@y..., bake111@a... wrote:
> hi rosi,
> yes, i saw the anne hecke interview and i thought it was great!
it was
> fascinating. as she described her "other personality" and
describing herself
> as "crazy" i kept thinking no, you are not crazy, you are just
> multidimensional!
> i was wondering what her psychologist said about the other
personality but
> she never told him about it. i don't know what kind of mental
illness
> diagnosis that she would fall under since she was fully functional
and
> coherant in the 3d world, yet had this "fantasy" life in her head.
so, to my
> understanding, that would not be schizophrenia nor bipolar. i am
not sure if
> that would be considered "dissassociative disorder" since usually
the
> dissassociative disorder is for more than one personality split.
> i am getting ready to order her book. again, that was one of the
best
> celebrity interviews i have ever seen. i am so glad i got to see it.
>
> jane

rosi: if anyone is interested, she is doing an online chat right now
on abcnews.com.

i thought it was great too. i really hope she doesn't close herself
off to this experience, writing it off as insanity. i don't see it
as anything other than a gift from the universe!

love and light
rosi

[glen main]

rosi wrote:

> --- in asc2k@y..., bake111@a... wrote:
> > hi rosi,
> > yes, i saw the anne hecke interview and i thought it was great!
> it was
> > fascinating. as she described her "other personality" and
> describing herself
> > as "crazy" i kept thinking no, you are not crazy, you are just
> > multidimensional!
> > i was wondering what her psychologist said about the other
> personality but
> > she never told him about it. i don't know what kind of mental
> illness
> > diagnosis that she would fall under since she was fully functional
> and
> > coherant in the 3d world, yet had this "fantasy" life in her head.
> so, to my
> > understanding, that would not be schizophrenia nor bipolar. i am
> not sure if
> > that would be considered "dissassociative disorder" since usually
> the
> > dissassociative disorder is for more than one personality split.
> > i am getting ready to order her book. again, that was one of the
> best
> > celebrity interviews i have ever seen. i am so glad i got to see it.
> >
> > jane
>
> rosi: if anyone is interested, she is doing an online chat right now
> on abcnews.com.
>
> i thought it was great too. i really hope she doesn't close herself
> off to this experience, writing it off as insanity. i don't see it
> as anything other than a gift from the universe!
>
> love and light
> rosi
>
> --

or, perhaps , a direct violation of free will.
to take over anothers body does not sound like much of a gift from the
universe.

[dreskir]

--- in asc2k@y..., glen main <frm@h...> wrote:
>
>
> rosi wrote:
>
> > --- in asc2k@y..., bake111@a... wrote:
> > > hi rosi,
> > > yes, i saw the anne hecke interview and i thought it was
great!
> > it was
> > > fascinating. as she described her "other personality" and
> > describing herself
> > > as "crazy" i kept thinking no, you are not crazy, you are just
> > > multidimensional!
> > > i was wondering what her psychologist said about the other
> > personality but
> > > she never told him about it. i don't know what kind of mental
> > illness
> > > diagnosis that she would fall under since she was fully
functional
> > and
> > > coherant in the 3d world, yet had this "fantasy" life in her
head.
> > so, to my
> > > understanding, that would not be schizophrenia nor bipolar. i am
> > not sure if
> > > that would be considered "dissassociative disorder" since
usually
> > the
> > > dissassociative disorder is for more than one personality split.
> > > i am getting ready to order her book. again, that was one of
the
> > best
> > > celebrity interviews i have ever seen. i am so glad i got to
see it.
> > >
> > > jane
> >
> > rosi: if anyone is interested, she is doing an online chat right
now
> > on abcnews.com.
> >
> > i thought it was great too. i really hope she doesn't close
herself
> > off to this experience, writing it off as insanity. i don't see
it
> > as anything other than a gift from the universe!
> >
> > love and light
> > rosi
> >
> > --
>
> or, perhaps , a direct violation of free will.
> to take over anothers body does not sound like much of a gift from
the
> universe.

***made her take ecstacy too.......

[Rosi]

glen,

i see your point. i wonder though, if celestia was just a
representation of her higher self coming through??? i don't know. it
seemed like a positive thing, just because it seemed like self-
preservation and centered on love. who knows if she felt forced to
take the ecstasy or overtaken by another spirit. i'm definitely
going to read her book to find out more details.

anyway, one of the biggest reasons why this interview excited me, was
the simple fact that the national media was giving voice to the idea
of higher dimensions... something the general public might not ever
even think about unless it's presented to them... you know?




--- in asc2k@y..., bjorn_nitmou@y... wrote:
> --- in asc2k@y..., glen main <frm@h...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > rosi wrote:
> >
> > > --- in asc2k@y..., bake111@a... wrote:
> > > > hi rosi,
> > > > yes, i saw the anne hecke interview and i thought it was
> great!
> > > it was
> > > > fascinating. as she described her "other personality" and
> > > describing herself
> > > > as "crazy" i kept thinking no, you are not crazy, you are just
> > > > multidimensional!
> > > > i was wondering what her psychologist said about the other
> > > personality but
> > > > she never told him about it. i don't know what kind of mental
> > > illness
> > > > diagnosis that she would fall under since she was fully
> functional
> > > and
> > > > coherant in the 3d world, yet had this "fantasy" life in her
> head.
> > > so, to my
> > > > understanding, that would not be schizophrenia nor bipolar. i
am
> > > not sure if
> > > > that would be considered "dissassociative disorder" since
> usually
> > > the
> > > > dissassociative disorder is for more than one personality
split.
> > > > i am getting ready to order her book. again, that was one
of
> the
> > > best
> > > > celebrity interviews i have ever seen. i am so glad i got to
> see it.
> > > >
> > > > jane
> > >
> > > rosi: if anyone is interested, she is doing an online chat
right
> now
> > > on abcnews.com.
> > >
> > > i thought it was great too. i really hope she doesn't close
> herself
> > > off to this experience, writing it off as insanity. i don't
see
> it
> > > as anything other than a gift from the universe!
> > >
> > > love and light
> > > rosi
> > >
> > > --
> >
> > or, perhaps , a direct violation of free will.
> > to take over anothers body does not sound like much of a gift
from
> the
> > universe.
>
> ***made her take ecstacy too.......

[Jeremy Weiland]

> > or, perhaps , a direct violation of free will.
> > to take over anothers body does not sound like much of a gift from
> the
> > universe.
>
> ***made her take ecstacy too.......

one thing to keep in mind is that *every one of us* are multidimensional
beings. even the crackheads on the street and tyrants and drug dealers.
all of our experience takes place in an environment that is inherently
multidimensional - so it should not come as a surprise that somebody goes
through a struggle in his or her life, as anne apparently did. however, it
is interesting that, if she did have some conscious contact with more
blatantly multidimensional aspects of herself and the universe, her
knowledge of that phenomenon was specific enough to entail memory of the
episodes as well as knowledge of the "density" of the entity and so on.

i don't think the fact that she "medicated" herself on certain occasions
detracts from the possiblity that she had more multidimensional experiences
than most. however, the above observations are by no means irrefutable
proof that she did have such experiences. she could very well have been
insane! who knows...

one more little tidbit. i don't want to get back on the drug defense /
bashing line of argument, but many psychologists and psychiatrists have been
shunned by the establishment for suggesting that they have found mdma, which
is the active ingredient in ecstasy, to be helpful for mental illnesses and
patients undergoing psychotherapy. anyway, there are *much* worse drugs you
can take than ecstasy, hands down. if an "evil" spirit really wanted to
hurt anne, he could have easily found her some crystal meth or heroin - but
i quickly digress. :-) (let me also say that i do not recommend the use of
*any* drugs.) just suggesting that the drug issue and possession issue are
all part of 3d experience which, for everybody, is multidimensional, and
doesn't rule out the possibility that she did have such experiences
consciously.

take care,

jeremy

[glen main]

rosi wrote:anyway, one of the biggest reasons why this interview excited me,
was

> the simple fact that the national media was giving voice to the idea
> of higher dimensions... something the general public might not ever
> even think about unless it's presented to them... you know?
>
>

true. every little bit helps. ;)
we are all at different learning levels.

unfortunately most are not ready.
we only learn what we already know somewhere in the back of our minds.
perhaps, re-learn would be a better term.