mars life experiment results

[Aaron Elder]

i seem to remember hoagland talking about this on art bell, maybe he shook
something out of the tree.

http://www.cnn.com/2001/tech/space/09/03/mars.viking/index.html



__________________________________________________ _______________
get your free download of msn explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

[David Wilcock]

from: aaron elder [mailto:karnisov@... (/group/asc2k/post?postid=pbranltbvd0n7tcjnsztkiyxh-rxdvhdmjqzws6hchafj2atpncvlo6zupuwwscaunan9nuaaa7d p8ej)]
i seem to remember hoagland talking about this on art bell, maybe he shook
something out of the tree.

http://www.cnn.com/2001/tech/space/09/03/mars.viking/index.html

dw: well, i didn't hear from him directly on this particular issue, though
there could be some other future developments that occur. i do think that
there is an overall progression towards disclosure, often referred to as pri
or processed release of information, and essentially they are trying to go
through baby-steps to create an ever-increasing public acceptance of what
will eventually be told. and it does appear that the ptb will have to deal
with hoagland's existence and research whether they like it or not.

both hoagland and i have discussed the chibolton 2001 glyphs and agree that
it appears to be done by our own terrestrial forces, experimenting with
their own, in some ways cruder technological mimicking of the true crop
circle formation technology. this could explain certain other formations
that have come through and have seemed to lack line quality in certain
respects, though still appearing complex. the recent article by dr. bruce
cornet, coupled with the problems with line quality of the two images,
seemed to seal the case that it wasn't a true et production.

http://bcornet.homestead.com/files/chilbolton/chilbolton.htm

peace be with you -

- david