Planes of Existence

[Jeff Johnson]

gang, the last line in the previous was a glitch in thehuman to
computer connection. while in the shower this question
occurred to me: if the classic reference to the spheres is correct
in that existence plays out in spheres rather than planes, and the
previous line of thought follows in similar fashion, would
dimensions/distortions be more like overlapping bubble
configurations that at some point will do something akin to the
big kachinka doll thing? the image in my mind would place a
variety of points in configurations that could accurately be kept
track of using the mayan calender as described by maurice
cottrell. perhaps it works like a spherical key, rather than lock,
so that a returning to the oneness becomes rushing in of energy
manifest as matter rather than spreading out. would that make
a black hole an amazing lovefest of conscious energy? i would
hope so. wouldn't it require rethinking gravity as attractivity and
inertia as the gravest force in the universe resulting in repulsion
or what we currently thin if as anti-gravity?

[czblake@...]

--- in asc2k@y..., angelfatigues@h... wrote:
> gang, the last line in the previous was a glitch in thehuman to
> computer connection. while in the shower this question
> occurred to me: if the classic reference to the spheres is correct
> in that existence plays out in spheres rather than planes, and the
> previous line of thought follows in similar fashion, would
> dimensions/distortions be more like overlapping bubble
> configurations that at some point will do something akin to the
> big kachinka doll thing? the image in my mind would place a
> variety of points in configurations that could accurately be kept
> track of using the mayan calender as described by maurice
> cottrell. perhaps it works like a spherical key, rather than lock,
> so that a returning to the oneness becomes rushing in of energy
> manifest as matter rather than spreading out. would that make
> a black hole an amazing lovefest of conscious energy? i would
> hope so. wouldn't it require rethinking gravity as attractivity and
> inertia as the gravest force in the universe resulting in repulsion
> or what we currently thin if as anti-gravity?

"when there is no more separation between 'this' and 'that,' it is
called the still-point of the tao. at the still point in the center of
the circle one can see the infinite in all things." chuang tzu

"the tao that can be spoken is not the tao." lao tzu

[Jeff Johnson]

gang, the relationship to be observed in the tao is between two
points in a field. it is the relationship of that which imagines
itself 'not' with the rest of all that it perceives of all that is well as
the simultaneous reality of all that is. the perceptions seem to
express a flow of give and take, a flow the direct relationship
between the points of aware and unaware. the reality is the one
circle mirrored in the illusions of aware/unaware. the
relationship is experience in creation. gives new meaning to the
expression of " full circle". amilius2001