Lynda
10-25-2003, 01:44 AM
David I was reading the Divine Cosmos today and found that you had a
number there that has stumped everyone, I would like to put my 2
cents in if I may. Here is what I am refering to.
"There is a most profound and beautiful question associated with the
observed coupling constant e ? the amplitude for a real electron to
emit or absorb a real photon. It is a simple number that has been
experimentally determined to be close to 0.08542455. My physicist
friends won't recognize this number, because they like to remember it
as the inverse of its square: about 137.03597 with an uncertainty of
about two in the last decimal place. It has been a mystery ever since
it was discovered more than fifty years ago, and all good theoretical
physicists put this number up on their wall and worry about it."
The number broken down in Numerology is: 0.08542455 = 0.033,
8+5+4+2+4+5+5=33 it is a very highly spiritual number. Also if you
take the 33 and turn it over on itself it will become a sign of
infinity. In other words turning the one 3 around to face the other,
also if you move the one onto the other they become one. There is a
lot of intimancy in this number as you were saying in the Divine
Cosmos.
Now about the storm, I have an antenna on my TV and this afternoon it
was really stactic but has this evening did settle down some, I can
always tell when a flare shoots of the sun, by the way my TV acts up,
some times I just have to turn if off.
--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=79zehQ8Non6PS5eM42U0ZXt7M6GPi0NSpxuify _PIDTZ_L6tZAq7ZNFMOYU79U3kh45X715bvfsTYfgw), "David Wilcock" <djw333@b...> wrote:
> Group,
>
> Here's MSNBC's take on what happened - they seem to be one of the
more
> forthcoming corporate media news sources.
>
> http://www.msnbc.com/news/750150.asp?0cv=CB10&cp1=1
>
> The article says outright that it is better not to tell people if
> something like this is coming...
>
> The part that the article doesn't say is that we are NOT in the
decline
> of a solar cycle - that should have started happening over two years
> ago. As Battros has said, the Sun's behavior is breaking all the
> standard models and expectations as we speak. We can expect that
this
> will only continue intensifying as we get closer to the "water
line" in
> 2010-2013 (see Divine Cosmos Supplemental.)
>
> http://ascension2000.com/DivineCosmos
>
> Peace be with you -
>
> - David
number there that has stumped everyone, I would like to put my 2
cents in if I may. Here is what I am refering to.
"There is a most profound and beautiful question associated with the
observed coupling constant e ? the amplitude for a real electron to
emit or absorb a real photon. It is a simple number that has been
experimentally determined to be close to 0.08542455. My physicist
friends won't recognize this number, because they like to remember it
as the inverse of its square: about 137.03597 with an uncertainty of
about two in the last decimal place. It has been a mystery ever since
it was discovered more than fifty years ago, and all good theoretical
physicists put this number up on their wall and worry about it."
The number broken down in Numerology is: 0.08542455 = 0.033,
8+5+4+2+4+5+5=33 it is a very highly spiritual number. Also if you
take the 33 and turn it over on itself it will become a sign of
infinity. In other words turning the one 3 around to face the other,
also if you move the one onto the other they become one. There is a
lot of intimancy in this number as you were saying in the Divine
Cosmos.
Now about the storm, I have an antenna on my TV and this afternoon it
was really stactic but has this evening did settle down some, I can
always tell when a flare shoots of the sun, by the way my TV acts up,
some times I just have to turn if off.
--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=79zehQ8Non6PS5eM42U0ZXt7M6GPi0NSpxuify _PIDTZ_L6tZAq7ZNFMOYU79U3kh45X715bvfsTYfgw), "David Wilcock" <djw333@b...> wrote:
> Group,
>
> Here's MSNBC's take on what happened - they seem to be one of the
more
> forthcoming corporate media news sources.
>
> http://www.msnbc.com/news/750150.asp?0cv=CB10&cp1=1
>
> The article says outright that it is better not to tell people if
> something like this is coming...
>
> The part that the article doesn't say is that we are NOT in the
decline
> of a solar cycle - that should have started happening over two years
> ago. As Battros has said, the Sun's behavior is breaking all the
> standard models and expectations as we speak. We can expect that
this
> will only continue intensifying as we get closer to the "water
line" in
> 2010-2013 (see Divine Cosmos Supplemental.)
>
> http://ascension2000.com/DivineCosmos
>
> Peace be with you -
>
> - David