Harmonic Astrology [Archive] - Divine Cosmos Discussions

alexh@...

08-12-2001, 11:30 AM

anyone read abbey's book, harmonic astrology?

i have read many of the classic astrology books and was never
satisfied with the method or the results. it seems as if the concept
is valid but the application is fraught with shortcomings. after
reading abbeys book i understand the true underpinnings of astrology.

i was shocked to find out that his book is out of print (although
it's not hard to find). perhaps the problem is that those without a
math/science background may not easily comprehend it. then again, the
universe is not easy to comprehend without knowledge of math and
science

Mrmailmut@...

08-14-2001, 04:43 AM

hi tiffany et al,

i too work with some very well known astrologers on another list. and i
believe the biggest problem with western astrology, ie the ancient babylonian
traditions, is that it only covers an exterior segment of the situation. the
oriental ie chinese, tibetan, systems fill in the missing segment in my
opinion. whereas, western astrology deals mainly with issues of personality,
the oriental goes a bit deeper into the actual nature of humanity, which is
given animalistic characteristics as an overt analogy. the precision of
combining both of these two systems, and then studying similar
characteristics between say two people of the same type but with different
personalities is really amazing. it is also interesting to see people of
similar natures, that react very differently to the same stimuli. western
astrology is inadequate to explain many of these characteristics. hope to
hear your ideas on this subject further.

stephen dail

celestial chessworks

Tiffani Boswell

08-14-2001, 05:57 AM

<table bgcolor="#ffffff">
>since the subject has come up...what is the groups feeling on western astrology.
>
>also, i have run into reading about vedic astrology lately which i find very interesting...
>
>i would like to hear from experience and any actual astronomy type basis...
>
>:) tiffani
<blockquote style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left: #000000 2px solid; margin-right: 0px">
style="font: 10pt arial">----- original message -----
style="background: #e4e4e4; font: 10pt arial; font-color: black">from: david wilcock (djw333@exis.net)
style="font: 10pt arial">to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com
style="font: 10pt arial">sent: august 14, 2001 9:33 am
style="font: 10pt arial">subject: re: [asc2k] harmonic astrology
>

><tt>anyone read abbey's book, harmonic astrology?
</tt>
><tt>dw:i can't say that i have. </tt><tt>
>
i have read many of the classic astrology books and was never
satisfied with the method or the results. it seems as if the concept
is valid but the application is fraught with shortcomings. after
reading abbeys book i understand the true underpinnings of astrology.

>dw: can you give us some more detail? i'm definitely interested, especially if it could impact what's already been posted online.
>
i was shocked to find out that his book is out of print (although
it's not hard to find). perhaps the problem is that those without a
math/science background may not easily comprehend it. then again, the
universe is not easy to comprehend without knowledge of math and
science.
>
>dw: indeed. if you give me an idea of why it would be of value then perhaps i'll go digging for it.
>
>peace be with you -
>
>- david
>
>

</tt>
<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>

<tt>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service (http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/).</tt>

<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>

<tt>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service (http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/).</tt>
</blockquote>

David Wilcock

08-14-2001, 07:33 AM

<table bgcolor="#ffffff">
><tt>anyone read abbey's book, harmonic astrology?
</tt>
><tt>dw:i can't say that i have. </tt><tt>
>
i have read many of the classic astrology books and was never
satisfied with the method or the results. it seems as if the concept
is valid but the application is fraught with shortcomings. after
reading abbeys book i understand the true underpinnings of astrology.

>dw: can you give us some more detail? i'm definitely interested, especially if it could impact what's already been posted online.
>
i was shocked to find out that his book is out of print (although
it's not hard to find). perhaps the problem is that those without a
math/science background may not easily comprehend it. then again, the
universe is not easy to comprehend without knowledge of math and
science.
>
>dw: indeed. if you give me an idea of why it would be of value then perhaps i'll go digging for it.
>
>peace be with you -
>
>- david
>
>

</tt>
<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>

<tt>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service (http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/).</tt>

alexh@...

08-14-2001, 11:25 AM

he shows that a birth chart zodiac should be interpreted as a
composite of sinusoidal waves. using this interpretation, the aspects
which are important depend on the birth chart and are not necessarily
the classical aspects. also, the concept of houses, cusps, sidereal
vs. tropical and even the constellations are made irrelevant.

interestingly, planetary associations such as warlike for mars etc.
are still valid.

so far in my studies, everything seems to come down to harmonic
theory. has anyone seen ray tomes website?

--- in asc2k@y..., "david wilcock" <djw333@e...> wrote:
> anyone read abbey's book, harmonic astrology?
>
> dw: i can't say that i have.
>
> i have read many of the classic astrology books and was never
> satisfied with the method or the results. it seems as if the
concept
> is valid but the application is fraught with shortcomings. after
> reading abbeys book i understand the true underpinnings of
astrology.
>
> dw: can you give us some more detail? i'm definitely interested,
especially if it could impact what's already been posted online.
>
> i was shocked to find out that his book is out of print (although
> it's not hard to find). perhaps the problem is that those without a
> math/science background may not easily comprehend it. then again,
the
> universe is not easy to comprehend without knowledge of math and
> science.
>
> dw: indeed. if you give me an idea of why it would be of value then
perhaps i'll go digging for it.
>
> peace be with you -
>
> - david
>
>
>
>
> to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=6vcybxpbsocz7nwv_2pmhmlajyqlmxyek7yeg-xekd9rfmvujdedt65smucm-g8a3qkjptev8o1aesl6z96hgqw2rqmk)
>
>
>
> your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service.

alexh@...

08-14-2001, 11:33 AM

abbey writes how vedic astrology has various alternate zodiacs which
instead of being divided by 12 are divided by nine, or other numbers.
in doing this they are able to discover harmonics which would be
concealed by simply dividing the zodiac into 12 parts. of course the
logical conclusion is to have a continuum where all harmonics are
apparent. problem is this requires use of a computer because the math
is very tedious.

--- in asc2k@y..., mrmailmut@a... wrote:
> hi tiffany et al,
>
> i too work with some very well known astrologers on another list.
and i
> believe the biggest problem with western astrology, ie the ancient
babylonian
> traditions, is that it only covers an exterior segment of the
situation. the
> oriental ie chinese, tibetan, systems fill in the missing segment
in my
> opinion. whereas, western astrology deals mainly with issues of
personality,
> the oriental goes a bit deeper into the actual nature of humanity,
which is
> given animalistic characteristics as an overt analogy. the
precision of
> combining both of these two systems, and then studying similar
> characteristics between say two people of the same type but with
different
> personalities is really amazing. it is also interesting to see
people of
> similar natures, that react very differently to the same stimuli.
western
> astrology is inadequate to explain many of these characteristics.
hope to
> hear your ideas on this subject further.
>
> stephen dail
> celestial chessworks

Brian V. Cox

08-14-2001, 11:38 AM

this is exactly what the mayan tzolkin is. it is a permutation table
of all wave harmonics.

i urge you to read "the mayan factor" by jose arguelles. it's mentioned
in convergence iii, but after reading the book, it really opened my
eyes to what the mayans knew of wave theory.

in lak'ech, brian

> abbey writes how vedic astrology has various alternate zodiacs which
> instead of being divided by 12 are divided by nine, or other numbers.
> in doing this they are able to discover harmonics which would be
> concealed by simply dividing the zodiac into 12 parts. of course the
> logical conclusion is to have a continuum where all harmonics are
> apparent. problem is this requires use of a computer because the math
> is very tedious.

--------------
brian cox - brian@... (/group/asc2k/post?postid=0uccgjuuxvnfwwgdgm5ry_txlchovlh-xwxqig381aedmj2maiu2le4crdlbd_r9d6fs4zfzeyo)
**magpu** music for your mind: http://www.magpu.com
"yawlurjazz!!!" - poor david, 7/1/98

alexh@...

08-14-2001, 02:00 PM

fascinating!

i have earth ascending by arguelles but i haven't read it yet.

--- in asc2k@y..., "brian v. cox" <lerxst@m...> wrote:
>
> this is exactly what the mayan tzolkin is. it is a permutation
table
> of all wave harmonics.
>
> i urge you to read "the mayan factor" by jose arguelles. it's
mentioned
> in convergence iii, but after reading the book, it really opened my
> eyes to what the mayans knew of wave theory.
>
> in lak'ech, brian
>
>
> > abbey writes how vedic astrology has various alternate zodiacs
which
> > instead of being divided by 12 are divided by nine, or other
numbers.
> > in doing this they are able to discover harmonics which would be
> > concealed by simply dividing the zodiac into 12 parts. of course
the
> > logical conclusion is to have a continuum where all harmonics are
> > apparent. problem is this requires use of a computer because the
math
> > is very tedious.
>
> --------------
> brian cox - brian@m...
> **magpu** music for your mind: http://www.magpu.com
> "yawlurjazz!!!" - poor david, 7/1/98