Stupid question I have concerning Venus and Arcturus

[Tony P.]

this is a very stupid question. i'm confused. and i'm not demanding
anyone to answer me, but i'd appreciate it if anyone knew, maybe you
could shed some light on this.

was the planet venus originally orbiting arcturus?

i say it's a very stupid question because i don't know how to really
research it. different stuff i've come across on the web points to
venus not being of this solar system originally.

[Rod Johnson]

tony,

your question is not in any way stupid.

tony p. wrote:

this is a very stupid question. i'm confused. and i'm not demanding

anyone to answer me, but i'd appreciate it if anyone knew, maybe you

could shed some light on this.



was the planet venus originally orbiting arcturus?



no. astral physics see venus as an original planet of this solar system.
lately with the advent of the nemesis theory it has been speculated that
venus could have been trapped within the central solar system during one
of the convolutions of the sister solar system of nemesis.



according to emanuel velekosky in his book planets in conflict venus was
a hot comet that was trapped in an orbit about the sun. in that account
both mars and earth were displaced.



i believe that the answer lies in the natural combination of both
scenarios. i composed my own theory that we are in a binary star system
in the early 70s. the existence of a brown dwarf sister sun, having
several satellites, that moves in the commentary paths explains many of
the mysteries of our earth and solar system.



a father and son astral physics team at uc berkeley firmly established
that theory in 1983. they named their sister system nemesis.



i say it's a very stupid question because i don't know how to really

research it. different stuff i've come across on the web points to

venus not being of this solar system originally.



archturus is an inner stellar planet that is not directly part of our
galaxy. all that we really know about archturus is found in a channeled
book we the archturians by norman milanovich.

keep searching any you will find it all,

>rod
>
>
>
>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>asc2k-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=bqi94igakfp0vbjlkk1jsj6dgkhy6dx8-ftnpix7wi1rzywiapaokyca-2dstu7btpim_8p5eqnrmd7728eh86d3cnao6_jalv_yba)
>
>
>
>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Tony P.]

wow, this is neat. actually not giving you the url sent me on
searching for where i read that originally. and ironically, that
turned out to be a good thing. since i found something else that
answered something i was confused over.
http://www.cassiopaea.com/sessions/941007.html answered my confusion
on http://isc.faqs.org/faqs/nostradamus/part8/ concerning atlantis.
cassiopaea mentions the comet/asteroid thing in it. basically the
same thing. that was for the third fall of atlantis by the way.

that same cassiopaea url i think was the original url concerning
venus. i will send this reply to the message board in hope david will
possibly comment on this. cause to my knowledge, he hasn't mentioned
venus being of another solar system. and to my knowledge, our solar
system was originally vulcan, mercury, earth, mars, maldek or
whatever, and so on. and the stuff i've been reading keeps talking
about earth as being a communication hub.

[Tony P.]

i need to make a correction in this post. go up a thread to see what
it was originally, just cutting dead text completely right now. i am
unable to find the site i found the information on. it was not
cassiopaea that lead me to make my previous post. it was another
site, and i cannot find it for some weird reason. i remember what it
talked about, and i tried using google.com to find it again, but i
think it's a lost cause and i'm going to have to accept that.

by the way, i'm having an weird ongoing feeling of deja vu right now.
ironically, it involves the cassiopaea site. and i do believe the
deja vu feelings aren't my imagination, but is actually a way of
notifying me to reflect on the now to avoid something or other. this
is unimportant however, and i expect no one to reply.