Vortex Theory of Everything [Archive] - Divine Cosmos Discussions

Barry Carter

02-21-2003, 07:40 AM

Dear Friends,

The following recent publication looks a lot like David Wilcox's Divine
Cosmos with added mathematical proofs:

PRESS RELEASE: MARCH 10 ,2003

AFTER three decades of scientific investigation
The theory of everything
is being presented to the world TODAY!
LOG ONTO: http://www.thevortextheory.com

After thirty years of work, a blockbuster discovery of unprecedented
importance is being presented to the world via the Internet. Called the
Vortex Theory, this new and revolutionary thesis has just passed the
refereeing process in Russia. Five of Russia's most distinguished
scientists from three of Moscow's most prestigious universities have
reviewed, authenticated the mathematical proof of the Vortex Theory Thesis,
and have authorized its publication.

Shockingly this new and revolutionary vision of the universe has so far
explained every great mystery of science it has been applied to.

Former mysteries such as the following are now easily explained:
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE GRAND UNIFICATION THEORY
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF THE PARTICLE AND WAVE THEORY OF LIGHT
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF THE PARTICLE AND WAVE THEORY OF MATTER
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF THE DOUBLE SLIT INTERFERENCE PATTERNS CREATED BY
A SINGLE PHOTON OR ELECTRON
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF ISOTROPIC SPIN (THE ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ½ SPIN OF PARTICLES)
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF NEWTON'S THREE LAWS OF MOTION
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· RESOLVING THE CONFLICT BETWEEN INERTIA MASS AND GRAVITATIONAL MASS
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF THE CONSERVATION OF CHARGE
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF THE CONSERVATION OF ANGULAR MOMENTUM
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF THE CONSERVATION OF MOMENTUM
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE CONSERVATION OF MASS AND ENERGY
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF THE MYSTERY OF ENTROPY
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF THE "DARK MATTER" and "DARK ENERGY" EFFECT
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· ANTI-GRAVITY ENGINEERING?
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· WHAT THE NEUTRINO REALLY IS AND WHY IT POSSESSES BOTH MATTER AND
ENERGY CHARACTERISTICS
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF BUOYANCY
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF HOW THE PROTON, ELECTRON, AND NEUTRON ARE CREATED
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF THE IONIC AND COVALENT BONDS IN CHEMISTRY
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE MECHANICAL EXPLANATION OF THE MICHELSON MORLEY EXPERIMENT
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF THE STRONG FORCE, WEAK FORCE, ELECTROMAGNETIC
FORCE AND THE FORCE OF GRAVITY
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF MASS
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF ENERGY
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· WHAT CAUSES ACCELERATION
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF THE MUON'S (AND ALL SUBATOMIC PARTICLE'S)
PROLONGED LIFETIME WHEN MOVING AT RELATIVISTIC VELOCITIES
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· ALL OF THE PHENOMENON ASSOCIATED WITH THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY ARE
NOW EXPLAINED
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· WHY ALL "PARTICLES" POSSESS THE SAME AMOUNT OF CHARGE
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF BLACK HOLES
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF PLANCK'S CONSTANT
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF HIGH VELOCITIES AND INCREASING MASS
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF THE STRIKING PARALLEL BETWEEN
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· NEWTON'S LAW OF GRAVITY AND COULOMB'S LAW
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF THE CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE EXPLANATION OF TIME AND TIME DILATION EFFECTS
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· THE REASON WHY ELECTRONS ORBIT PROTONS CREATING ATOMS
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· GOD?
ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃ ÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ· UNIVERSAL RELIGION?

--

With kindest regards,

Barry Carter
<bcarter@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=QRcM3w6w6ZUj4v5KvTo3cIM7B2Kpqi3MUASsRJ inNYLehjZMmKDJShgml5yjbW6hQkrHvCYwdu3icw)>
2319 Balm
Baker City, Oregon 97814
Phone: 541-523-3357
Web Pages:
Forest - http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/bmnfa/index.htm
ORMUS - http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/whatisit.htm

A good man, before he can help a bad man,
Finds in himself the matter with the bad man.
And whichever teacher
Discounts the lesson
Is as far off the road as the other,
Whatever else he may know.
That is the heart of it.
-Tao Te Ching, Lao Tzu

Why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest
not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy
brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is
in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own
eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy
brother's eye.
-Matthew 7:3-5

David Wilcock

02-21-2003, 09:11 AM

From: "Barry Carter" <bcarter@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=rHIqRjl88gwR-9n6FgU2MxJg_AhAHu8EpLCCTnzwLwCxqrY0wgICpgJ0vcLjdre YV0P0foseKA)>

> Dear Friends,
>
> The following recent publication looks a lot like David Wilcox's Divine
> Cosmos with added mathematical proofs:

DW: It's Wilcock, not Wilcox. This is interesting, in the sense that I have
not considered trying to state the peer-review that formally, although I do
have that quote from Dr. Smelyakov. The immediate problems that I see with
it is that the level of writing is rather simple, with short sentences and
grammatical problems, and more importantly, it has more bragging about
itself than is wise and dives right into questions that do not have much
meaning to non-scientific people.

The meat of the theory itself does not appear to be directly related to
Divine Comsos, i.e. it is not a straight-ahead copy, but there are definite
similarities. Now is the time where we can expect that more and more of
these types of new models will come through to public awareness... but Rod
Johnson will probably be quick to raise an eyebrow when the man mentions the
particle model in his writings. ***BZZZ!*** Not exactly.

By the way, Rod, I meant to thank you for sending me that donation and the
CD with your most recent work on it. Things are really in transition right
now as I'm in the process of turning over the apartment in lieu of moving to
Louisville.

Peace be with you -

- David

John

02-21-2003, 05:54 PM

http://www.crawford2000.co.uk/sch.htm

Interesting. Note where he says the speed of light
must either change of the Earth must change sizes.

Peace.
Love.
Light.

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/

Barry Carter

02-21-2003, 08:54 PM

Dear David,

At 10:11 AM 2/21/2003, you wrote:
>From: "Barry Carter" <bcarter@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=VBLAGj4lZMPHAXV7MaVzSXJ-mK4SxtkS92FKFpIsaR6PLs2VI_oaDYIuwNgZuH8uO6gqlP_V)>
>
> > Dear Friends,
> >
> > The following recent publication looks a lot like David Wilcox's Divine
> > Cosmos with added mathematical proofs:
>
>DW: It's Wilcock, not Wilcox.

Sorry about that.

--

With kindest regards,

Barry Carter
<bcarter@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=VBLAGj4lZMPHAXV7MaVzSXJ-mK4SxtkS92FKFpIsaR6PLs2VI_oaDYIuwNgZuH8uO6gqlP_V)>
2319 Balm
Baker City, Oregon 97814
Phone: 541-523-3357
Web Pages:
Forest - http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/bmnfa/index.htm
ORMUS - http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/whatisit.htm

A good man, before he can help a bad man,
Finds in himself the matter with the bad man.
And whichever teacher
Discounts the lesson
Is as far off the road as the other,
Whatever else he may know.
That is the heart of it.
-Tao Te Ching, Lao Tzu

Why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest
not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy
brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is
in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own
eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy
brother's eye.
-Matthew 7:3-5

Tony P.

02-22-2003, 07:56 PM

Just a note for those who care to speculate. Notice the 911s below.
Not only in the message number, but the time (not sure if my local
time affects it)
Message 9111 of 9119 | Previous | Next [ Up Thread ] Message
Index Msg #

From: "David Wilcock" <david@a...>
Date: Fri Feb 21, 2003 9:11 am
Subject: Re: [asc2k] Vortex Theory of Everything

--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=NaVaHaFLNuQtFTA6k1GY8GZqd78-rV2sHlzpEzd3w69z97lP4yRwN4ck8fZJWHc8tR83HPUvZxuWN3 Ea-R2N1A), "David Wilcock" <david@a...> wrote:
> From: "Barry Carter" <bcarter@i...>
>
> > Dear Friends,
> >

adeonekonade

02-25-2003, 05:37 PM

Hi David,

Did you actually buy the Theory? There seems to be nothing on the
website except crappy marketing info.

If so, its it worth paying for?

Regards

Adeon
http://www.alzimach.net

--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=MN129P6H3YC5xVBbP1U1CcTGlsVESsJuuv3prd O5ogmHL2VuKsoYmp23u3kBcSaI4lXNCyLgExHzv1ErXvLZ), "David Wilcock" <david@a...> wrote:
> From: "Barry Carter" <bcarter@i...>
>
> > Dear Friends,
> >
> > The following recent publication looks a lot like David Wilcox's
Divine
> > Cosmos with added mathematical proofs:
>
> DW: It's Wilcock, not Wilcox. This is interesting, in the sense
that I have
> not considered trying to state the peer-review that formally,
although I do
> have that quote from Dr. Smelyakov. The immediate problems that I
see with
> it is that the level of writing is rather simple, with short
sentences and
> grammatical problems, and more importantly, it has more bragging
about
> itself than is wise and dives right into questions that do not have
much
> meaning to non-scientific people.
>
> The meat of the theory itself does not appear to be directly
related to
> Divine Comsos, i.e. it is not a straight-ahead copy, but there are
definite
> similarities. Now is the time where we can expect that more and
more of
> these types of new models will come through to public awareness...
but Rod
> Johnson will probably be quick to raise an eyebrow when the man
mentions the
> particle model in his writings. ***BZZZ!*** Not exactly.
>
> By the way, Rod, I meant to thank you for sending me that donation
and the
> CD with your most recent work on it. Things are really in
transition right
> now as I'm in the process of turning over the apartment in lieu of
moving to
> Louisville.
>
> Peace be with you -
>
> - David

Barry Carter

02-25-2003, 05:55 PM

Dear Friends,

Here is another Atomic Vortex Theorem of Energy Motion

http://members.tripod.com/SDAI_labs/AVT8.html

At 08:40 AM 2/21/2003, you wrote:
>Dear Friends,
>
>The following recent publication looks a lot like David Wilcox's Divine
>Cosmos with added mathematical proofs:
>
>PRESS RELEASE: MARCH 10 ,2003
>
>AFTER three decades of scientific investigation
>The theory of everything
>is being presented to the world TODAY!
>LOG ONTO: http://www.thevortextheory.com

--

With kindest regards,

Barry Carter
<bcarter@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=qGI62NlwAbETnHF4ZKSUN9Tblku1ps5RXmCk0c vBaWnfyPSSXFknwuVSuCwSIAIdraL_tMY)>
2319 Balm
Baker City, Oregon 97814
Phone: 541-523-3357
Web Pages:
Forest - http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/bmnfa/index.htm
ORMUS - http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/whatisit.htm

A good man, before he can help a bad man,
Finds in himself the matter with the bad man.
And whichever teacher
Discounts the lesson
Is as far off the road as the other,
Whatever else he may know.
That is the heart of it.
-Tao Te Ching, Lao Tzu

Why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest
not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy
brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is
in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own
eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy
brother's eye.
-Matthew 7:3-5

Chris Hamilton

02-25-2003, 06:20 PM

Adeon,

You have been on the site since last July. If you haven't read ascension2000
info by now and noticed all of the extensive references that David uses in
his research, then I would cordially request that you do so. David is a
researcher. He is not a scientist, and he makes this quite clear in all of
his articles. And he has an extensive bibliography in all of his research.
My humble opinion, but I think you were being condescending below, not very
kind, and definately negative. Chris

> Did you actually buy the Theory? There seems to be nothing on the
> website except crappy marketing info.>
> If so, its it worth paying for?>
> Regards>
> Adeon
> http://www.alzimach.net

Barry Carter

02-25-2003, 09:05 PM

Dear Paul,

Good link! More grist for the mill.

At 10:42 PM 2/25/2003, you wrote:
> > Here is another Atomic Vortex Theorem of Energy Motion
> > http://members.tripod.com/SDAI_labs/AVT8.html
> > Barry Carter
>
>And here is another link about vortex forces that MAY supplement the
>above reference. It is a theory that suggests that a tornado's
>destructive force is derived from charged particles formed within
>the vortex rather than the wind itself. Apparently it is the
>charged particle domains and accompanying magnetic forces that
>intensify and perpetuate vortex motion. The mechanism also suggests
>that ball lightning may be a form of controlled fusion.
>
>www.peter-thomson.co.uk/tornado/fusion/Charge_sheath_vortex_basics_for_tornado.\
html
>
>(may need to fix and past link into browser)
>
>This link however does not provide the rigor found in Barry's
>reference above. It may be incomplete as well as there may be more
>elegant solutions that ascribe to zero point energy souces. They
>are supplied here as extra thoughts only... perhaps as a simple
>explanation about a small part of the whole.
>
>Paul
>
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>asc2k-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=cWK0SoCwu2Q6-fcRVv2jUQ_yL88QF6qoUw8m3SXhtA9le-J85SAVbuR5kZ2vOc8Gl-iuMq3oH-Q9R4x5tQj59xRKj6NWvZ9L)
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

--

With kindest regards,

Barry Carter
<bcarter@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=IrscG_1PFjJCMiwRE5v3RFfPNdH0X55Uygt4WI cEEOzUewBFhE7ees9UHERLuPV20IHIAz5DNdA)>
2319 Balm
Baker City, Oregon 97814
Phone: 541-523-3357
Web Pages:
Forest - http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/bmnfa/index.htm
ORMUS - http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/whatisit.htm

A good man, before he can help a bad man,
Finds in himself the matter with the bad man.
And whichever teacher
Discounts the lesson
Is as far off the road as the other,
Whatever else he may know.
That is the heart of it.
-Tao Te Ching, Lao Tzu

Why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest
not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy
brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is
in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own
eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy
brother's eye.
-Matthew 7:3-5

Paul Kandrah

02-25-2003, 09:42 PM

> Here is another Atomic Vortex Theorem of Energy Motion
> http://members.tripod.com/SDAI_labs/AVT8.html
> Barry Carter

And here is another link about vortex forces that MAY supplement the
above reference. It is a theory that suggests that a tornado's
destructive force is derived from charged particles formed within
the vortex rather than the wind itself. Apparently it is the
charged particle domains and accompanying magnetic forces that
intensify and perpetuate vortex motion. The mechanism also suggests
that ball lightning may be a form of controlled fusion.

www.peter-
thomson.co.uk/tornado/fusion/Charge_sheath_vortex_basics_for_tornado.
html

(may need to fix and past link into browser)

This link however does not provide the rigor found in Barry's
reference above. It may be incomplete as well as there may be more
elegant solutions that ascribe to zero point energy souces. They
are supplied here as extra thoughts only... perhaps as a simple
explanation about a small part of the whole.

Paul