PDA

View Full Version : Reading reactions



Tarzan
12-21-2002, 10:05 AM
group,

it has been interesting to me to see the bit of a dearth of responses/reactions
to david's profound reading of 12/5/02. given the level of profundity of the
reading, i am not surprised, as it can be a reality-busting bomb for those who
had been counting on having at least a few more years of life as we know it,
but, no, next year's the big one in many ways. heck i was counting on having a
few more years myself.

so while i was at my best friend's house, sharing a bong with him and his
girlfriend, shooting the breeze about the reading and our reactions to it, we
discussed this at length. he played the devil's advocate, as he usually does,
in asking about the authenicity of david's reading. he felt that it could be
lucifer hissefl speaking through david and leading many astray to trust those
who later would say "hey, it's time...come on up to our ship", only to be taken
onto darth vader's death star to meet untimely deaths. well, he's got a point.
how do we know that david's reading is spot-on or something to throw us off our
paths?

i said to my friend that i had a very high level of confidence in david's
reading and that lucifer hisself could not possibly bring through disinformation
through david because his powers of lack of love/light do not match up with the
powers of love/light like it does in david's case. but how do we know that?
for me the reading resonated deeply and i felt it to be true. i am sure that
david sat with this reading for the two week period of time between the
reception of the reading and the eventual release of it and carefully considered
the impacts that this huge reading would have upon the world. i am sure that
david would not have released it if he himself did not have a very high level of
confidence of the perspicacity of it.

so i trust this reading and am making my huge life-changing decisions based on
it. at the least, my plans are that even if i did not get to be asked to go on
the big evac, i will have at least made it more possible to help others as
myself to survive the initial changes of strong sorts, but not yet so tramatic
as the will certainly be several years beyond 2003, but before 2012.

so how do you feel about this reading, now that you have had a chance to process
it for a couple of days?

~seth


[non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Bake111@...
12-21-2002, 03:50 PM
in a message dated 12/21/2002 10:45:49 pm eastern standard time,
tarzan@... (/group/asc2k/post?postid=4mt2mzzkypzy6zbvs7xza3gv8tiq5srhodvcxt hmmrjwucr1ixdz-wrogasqhqjtwt66civ4qg) writes:


> so i trust this reading and am making my huge life-changing decisions based
> on
>

hi seth,
i am lost. what was it that david said that is encouraging you to make
changes?
what makes you think that many people will be gone in 2003? or am i
reading something wrong here? i read what david wrote, but i must have read
it too quickly. what is supposed to happen in 2003, besides the usual wars
and earthquakes, that could affect you?
if you could just summarize in one paragraph what it is about david's
reading that is affecting you so profoundly, i would really appreciate it.
right now i am feeling lost following along with this thread. thanks!

jane


[non-text portions of this message have been removed]