Photon Belt

[Tarzan]

regarding the photon belt,

barbara hand clow, the author of the pleadian
agenda, has stated that the earth and her
orbit would start to enter the photon belt,
starting in the late '90s with an initial
entry being rather brief, then each year
would have longer periods of entry, something
like a month per year of more time of the
earth herself being in the photon belt with
the entire orbit of the earth being fully in
the photon belt prior to 2012.

i just now looked for the bloody book and
cannot find it for reference, sheesh--perhaps
i have loaned it out. any book loaned out
disappears into the book black hole, i swear.
those documented black holes in the universe
will be stuffed full of books from earth, i
am 100% certain. ;-)

the photon belt has been described as a
giant, shimmering donut in space and is
re-entered into by earth/sun every 26,000
years, which neatly coincides with the
harvesting opportunities of those periods of
time. to me it is like a giant
life-recalibration device that recalibrates
life itself so that it could be more
harmoniously supportive of the development of
the affected beings, who are learning about
the value of harmony through creating
disharmony.

it is also interesting to note that the two
initial periods of the destructions of
atlantis seemed to coincide with the
earth/sun intersections with the photon belt,
with the third destruction happening close to
the half-way point to the third rendesvous
with the photon belt.

~seth


[non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Alex]

hi everybody !

maybe the answer of the following question is in the
divine cosmos reading, but until now i have not been
able to check it, well, is there any tentative date
since when the earth will be totally into the photon
belt energy ?
some other readings of the photon belt talk about a
null zone before the earth enter to the photon belt,
and into this zone we will undergo approx. 3 days of
obscurity, and once we have left the null zone we will
undergo only light, that is we won't have night for
long time due to the reaction of the crash between the
atmosphere and the photons. some of you know something
about it ?

i love you.

=====
l/l,
alex.

__________________________________________________ _______
do you yahoo!?
la mejor conexiãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚ â‚ãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â³n a internet y 25mb extra a tu correo por $100 al mes.
http://net.yahoo.com.mx

[David Wilcock]

from: "alex"

is there any tentative date
> since when the earth will be totally into the photon
> belt energy ?

dw: read the supplemental to divine cosmos. everything implodes at the end
of december 2012 - that's the moment we "cross the waterline" from one
fluidlike energy density to another. my most recent reading covers this.

> some other readings of the photon belt talk about a
> null zone before the earth enter to the photon belt,
> and into this zone we will undergo approx. 3 days of
> obscurity, and once we have left the null zone we will
> undergo only light, that is we won't have night for
> long time due to the reaction of the crash between the
> atmosphere and the photons. some of you know something
> about it ?

dw: bunkum. this is more of what happens with an overly literal reading of
revelations coupled with popular imagination. the three and a half days
referred to in the book have to do with the three and a half point in the
chakra system being reached. up until this point there is darkness - the
three and a half is the axis or tilt point where you can either drop back to
third density for the next cycle or go on to fourth-density here on earth.

also, it's a lot more than just photons we're moving into. reread chapter
eight of divine cosmos... and as i wrote in the revelation series, there is
a burst of light that the sun gives off at the end of the cycle, which is
correlated with all previous mass extinctions as well.

peace be with you -

- david
> i love you.
>
> =====
> l/l,
> alex.
>
> __________________________________________________ _______
> do you yahoo!?
> la mejor conexiãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚ â‚ãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â³n a internet y 25mb extra a tu correo por $100 al mes.
http://net.yahoo.com.mx
>
> to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> asc2k-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=2eajoyinfsc5iqv7i47qptlplqe175euijqews _sovrllnuanp4lz6q_7feerp0txbedkmyvltead3skaa6ouc8j fdncz0y)
>
>
>
> your use of yahoo! groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

[Tony P.]

--- in asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=nizdb08swczvpjnyjieyhyzd7ofmtk71yax34a p9inbjzfbydayog6z1dk_xqnuetix7ihotcn8_c42j), "david wilcock" <david@a...> wrote:
> from: "alex"
>
> is there any tentative date
> > since when the earth will be totally into the photon
> > belt energy ?
>
> dw: read the supplemental to divine cosmos. everything implodes at
the end
> of december 2012 - that's the moment we "cross the waterline" from
one
> fluidlike energy density to another. my most recent reading covers
this.

i'm certainly confused. http://greatdreams.com/2039.htm says 2012 is
fraudulent, unless i misread something. i probably have since i've
done it in the past numerous times, even as little as a one word
mistake throwing me off completely.
i usually send me replies directly to the person, unless i accidently
post them to the group, or state otherwise. but since david wilcock
has a lot on his hands, i'm posting this to the group, for those who
are wondering.

[Jeremy Weiland]

> > some other readings of the photon belt talk about
> > a null zone before the earth enter to the photon
> > belt, and into this zone we will undergo approx. 3

> > days of obscurity, and once we have left the null
> > zone we will undergo only light, that is we won't
> > have night for long time due to the reaction of
> > the crash between the atmosphere and the photons.
> > some of you know something about it ?

man, that sounds suspiciously close to the scenario
laid down in fatima prophecy by ray stanford. in
those readings, the source discusses the probability
of earth entering an area of radiation in the galaxy
that kills a lot of people and causes mutation to
create a new "root race" (this being an alternative to
nuclear war causing mutating radiation) - a little
hokey in a 50's sci fi sort of way, imho. there is
also the prophecy of three days of dark or something
going on related to this radiation bombardment, of
which the fatima miracles were emblematic.

i dunno, that book really was one of my primary
introduction into metaphysics, yet looking back on it
with what i know now, it seems a little simplistic at
best and a little fear-based at worst. the idea of
entering an area of radiation sounds similar to the
idea that we're moving into a parker spiral sector of
higher aetheric energy density. "radiation" is
probably the closest term the source could think of
w/o getting into a lecture on the lism in detail.

i'm not completely cut-off to the idea that some of
the things written about in revelation coming
literally true, but even if they do, they are symbolic
of inner processes just like any other event. the
universe is fractal, which means the level you're at
is irrelevant because the same process is occuring -
as above, so below, and as within, so without.

the important thing to remember is that what happens
is not nearly as important as how you react to it.

l/l

jeremy

__________________________________________________
do you yahoo!?
yahoo! mail plus - powerful. affordable. sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

[Jeremy Weiland]

> i'm certainly confused.
> http://greatdreams.com/2039.htm says 2012 is
> fraudulent, unless i misread something.

no, you didn't misread it, but you have to understand
that's at least 3 or 4 years old, maybe more. the
work of smelyakov gives 2012 a specific meaning
independent of mysterious innuendo.

divine cosmos is david's latest work. the best way to
not be confused is to read his book. :-) it's right
there on the web at
http://ascension2000.com/divinecosmos/

l/l

jeremy

__________________________________________________
do you yahoo!?
yahoo! mail plus - powerful. affordable. sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

[David Wilcock]

from: "jeremy weiland"

> > i'm certainly confused.
> > http://greatdreams.com/2039.htm says 2012 is
> > fraudulent, unless i misread something.
>
> no, you didn't misread it, but you have to understand
> that's at least 3 or 4 years old, maybe more. the
> work of smelyakov gives 2012 a specific meaning
> independent of mysterious innuendo.
>
> divine cosmos is david's latest work. the best way to
> not be confused is to read his book. :-) it's right
> there on the web at
> http://ascension2000.com/divinecosmos/

dw: originally i did think that 2012 was a fraudulent date. this represents
my thinking as of 1998. it was based on the work of maurice chatelain, who
believed that the mayan calendar had been calibrated incorrectly. while his
arguments were compelling at the time, i had latinos emailing me and saying
i was racist against the mayans, all sorts of weird things like that.
finally i came to grips with the fact that the age of aquarius changes
around 2012, that the ra books say 2010-2013 and that there is a galactic
alignment that hovers around this time period as well.

i do feel that 2039 is an important date in its own right... in fact i still
do get the sense that most people won't be coming back to earth in its
fourth-density condition until then, due to the need for some linear time to
pass in order to clean things up and have floodwaters dissipate, et cetera.
i'm on the cleanup crew, that much i know, which is why i'll be coming back
earlier than 2039. the jupiter-saturn conjunctions are an important part of
how the cycles flow, and this is a year when it will happen again. it also
correlates with a date given in a crop formation that showed a planetary
alignment, as i had written way back in that article.

the key now is to focus on smelyakov's cycle and not try to read too much
into my sophomore efforts. we know that there is a convergence happening
around the 2012 date, and i don't need to keep repeating the reasons... just
read my article on smelyakov. also again realize that quibbling over dates
like this is transient.

peace be with you -

- david

[David Wilcock]

from: "tarzan"

> regarding the photon belt,
>
> barbara hand clow, the author of the pleadian
> agenda, has stated that the earth and her
> orbit would start to enter the photon belt,
> starting in the late '90s with an initial
> entry being rather brief, then each year
> would have longer periods of entry, something
> like a month per year of more time of the
> earth herself being in the photon belt with
> the entire orbit of the earth being fully in
> the photon belt prior to 2012.

dw: ugh... the photon belt, here we go. you should be aware of the fact that
dr. paul la violette, who may be speaking with us on the west coast, has
publicly stated that he submitted a manuscript to clow's publishing company
which she rejected, and the data from that work was then "channeled" into
the book that you are referring to. again we have mention of a person who is
highly controversial. i have not personally surveyed the material because of
all that i have heard. it is hearsay, so i have no independent validation of
what i was told, but it was enough. please don't ask for details... i do not
want to just hand out opinions regarding the flawed status of modern
channeling.

from the scientific perspective, i do feel that the entire photon belt
theory as it now stands is heavily flawed. it is loosely, intuitively based
on the truth, but so riddled with distortions as to only be a booster rocket
for material such as that presented in the law of one at best. lots of
investigative work has been done to try to trace the model back to its
source, and it appears that the german scientist otto hesse who discovered
more photons entering into ambient vaccum space did / does not exist. it
seems to have entirely been the imagination / channeling of an american
housewife. not that this would be a problem, but her apparent lack of
scientific education explains why the theory is so clumsy.

the idea of a ring around the solar system was an insufficient attempt to
explain why we have a precessional cycle of 26,000 years, one that is
absoutely baseless from the scientific perspective. we are moving through
the galaxy, so any ambient structure surrounding and traveling with the
solar system is not adequate to account for the changes in the lism that are
encountered. there is an oort cloud around the solar system, but this is not
a source of higher aetheric energy on any periodic basis - it is gas, energy
and dust that vibrates at whatever level the heliosphere is functioning at.

when you understand the basis behind the nineveh constant and the galactic
constant, you realize that these cycles permeate throughout the entire
galaxy... and they are far too ornate and interrelated, due to the harmonic
pulsations of the central oscillator and how every planet's orbital period
nests with every other right down to the second, for such a silly idea as
one ring around one solar system to be responsible for something like this.
not to mention that we have an insoluble problem with the idea that a single
toroidal ring would have such massive anisotropic changes in energetic
capacitance within itself.

what we see is that toroids must attain harmonic equilibrium since they
represent one spherical "shell" in the nested layers of waves surrounding a
central oscillator. this is the same as how oil and water naturally separate
into layers. so to say that this ring has a higher charge at the edges is
bunkum. that excess energy would immediately bleed off into an adjacent
density layer. there is some important anisotropy in galactic energy fields
that is not based on nested spheres, such as in the parker spiral formation,
but it is not a ring like this - and the hypothetical ring structure also
does not conform to any platonic solid harmonic either. plain and simple,
it's wrong.

the problem in japan is that they have really run with the photon belt
theory to the point that even when i explain all of its flaws, it goes on.
however, they seem to be extremely jazzed about how much more meat i have
added to the whole model, bringing it up to a truly reputable status.
thankfully no one has sufficiently translated the nibiru 2003 hoax into
japanese, another flawed attempt to explain why these things are happening,
so no one knew what i was talking about when it came up at my lecture in
tokyo. that was really nice to hear... this is primarily an american new age
affliction.

what we do have is a parker spiral structure of energetic fields in the
galaxy, and the harmonics of their wavelengths, driven by the central
oscillator at the galactic core, in turn form the torsion fields whose
spiraling qualities drive the solar and planetary cycles, including the
nineveh constant. this is some of the stuff that needs to get finished with
divine cosmos, and it appears that i'll have a good opportunity to get it
finished by next spring, as the jan / feb period has always been the best
time to do scientific writing for me, every year.

if you didn't understand this post, just start reading the convergence
series, beginning with the souped-up version of shift of the ages, the first
volume. slowly it'll all come together and you'll enjoy the process.

peace be with you -

- david