dreskir
06-26-2001, 07:52 AM
In regard to the global grid lines, I have seen them mapped out, but
I have a question.....Is the map to scale...ie, how big are the grid
lines? 100 miles wide, 10?? And thus, how big would the circle formed
by two or more crossing be? Finally, what is the redius of the Vile
Vortex in Africa, and do we have any information on what type of
structures currently lie on that land - Which would then lead to few
more q's......Im planning my vacation, just kidding.
David Wilcock
06-26-2001, 08:26 AM
<table bgColor="#ffffff">
><tt>>In regard to the global grid lines, I have seen them mapped out, but
I have a question.....Is the map to scale...ie, how big are the grid
lines? 100 miles wide, 10?? </tt>
><tt></tt>
><tt>This is actually an interesting question. The Grid, as I understand it, is caused by the vibration of aetheric energy within the Earth. There are no "physical" formations. I think that as we can see from both the market movements as well as the "grid circles," what you really need to watch is the elliptical 'containment perimeters' around each line. For further information see Chapter 18 of SOTA. I think this link will work:</tt>
><tt></tt>
><tt>http://ascension2000.com/Shift-of-the-Ages/shift18.htm</tt>
><tt></tt>
><tt>The lines themselves are just showing the quickest paths between each of the nodal points, and in certain cases they do have their effects as well, such as the formation of South America, the Eastern side of Hudson Bay and the Eastern side of Africa. The most dramatic example of a nodal point visibly affecting the land would be the Gizeh plateau, where you have the chord of a perfect circle carved out on the northern coast of the Mediterranean. </tt>
><tt></tt>
><tt>>And thus, how big would the circle formed
by two or more crossing be? </tt>
><tt></tt>
><tt>Good question. Perhaps the diameter of the circle around Gizeh is a good estimate. I believe Wouter Hagens has been working on this. </tt>
><tt></tt>
><tt>>Finally, what is the redius of the Vile
Vortex in Africa, and do we have any information on what type of
structures currently lie on that land - Which would then lead to few
more q's......Im planning my vacation, just kidding.
</tt>
><tt>I'm not necessarily sure that ALL vortexes have structures on them. After all, a majority of the 12 "vile vortices" are not directly on land. They have a tendency to push land away. You can see on the Eastern side of South America and the northern side of Australia how the nodes naturally pushed away the surrounding landmass. More to the point, it would be that ALL ancient and sacred structures appear to have been built somewhere along one of the gridlines.</tt>
><tt></tt>
><tt>We may have some others who have studied these areas as well. </tt>
><tt></tt>
><tt>One update that I feel comfortable sharing at this time: </tt>
><tt></tt>
><tt>I have decided definitively to restructure BOTH CIII and SOTA. CIII will now officially be the first in a series, and SOTA will be configured to follow in its footsteps. SOTA will become the book that I had originally wanted to write on Atlantis, and I will be taking some further material from it and putting it into CIII. </tt>
><tt></tt>
><tt>Even more importantly, just as my first section of the seminar tour is straight science, the first book in the series (CIII) will not have any mention of ETs, channeling, crop circles, Atlantis, et cetera. The spiritual side will remain focused on the cross-cultural religious / prophetic studies only. This is after some very straight talk with Hoagland, Mandelker and other collaborators. The idea is to incorporate as much of an audience as possible. It also paves the way for SOTA to be a good follow-up to CIII. So far there has been no sign of disagreement from a dream, only positives.</tt>
><tt></tt>
><tt>The "problem" is that so few people are familiar with the extent of information that I have offered in the first place. Channeling has such a bad reputation in the modern Internet community that most people capable of understanding the book would never get past the first chapter. There aren't many people who have the combination of open-mindedness to RA and knowledge of deep physics at the same time. We need the deep thinkers to see this. </tt>
><tt></tt>
><tt>I may also delete some material from CIII, such as the information on precessional propulsion. I really want to keep the size under 400 pages, with a max ceiling of 450. I'm already over 300 with the fifteen chapters that have been posted for CIII and I still haven't hit "the point" yet. (Of course, the previously posted forms of these works will remain archived.) </tt>
><tt></tt>
><tt>Sometime soon I'll be posting a reading from December on sequential physics. Rod, are you out there? This is a VERY cool reading and I didn't even know it existed.</tt>
><tt></tt>
><tt>Peace be with you - </tt>
><tt></tt>
><tt>- David</tt>
><tt><font face="Arial" size="2"></font>
><font face="Arial" size="2"></font><font face="Arial" size="2"></font><font face="Arial" size="2"></font><font face="Arial" size="2"></font>
</tt>
>
<tt>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com
</tt>
<tt>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service (http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/).</tt>
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.