New DNA Strands

[Ellen Botelho]

greetings everyone. i'm a newbie here, but someone who has read david's labor
of love on ascension 2000. :)

david w., i can understand your point, but the article does quote hard evidence:
"dr. fox has proven through blood tests that some people have actually developed
new strands of dna." could it be that this extra dna is what allows the dense
physical part of us to be transformed at will, to higher density? (thus into
light beings?) i say this respectfully, as i have not done the amount of
research, and lightwork, channeling, etc., that you have. i wonder if at
another point of transition, does the actual dna become a moot point, but for
the jump from 3d to 4d, is it still needed? perhaps dr. fox needs to present
the actual test results.

just wondering! blessings to you all; i am learning so much from all of you.
thanks.

much love,

ellen





---------------------------------
do you yahoo!?
yahoo! mail plus - powerful. affordable. sign up now

[non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[mizbabzie@...]

in a message dated 11/25/02 5:35:11 pm pacific standard time, frm@... (/group/asc2k/post?postid=e8uea1auyhti68uzztasdo5du-rylz8yeei2eo3vyp4ly-eqe2xoqczsrxszxnos7i8imcg)
writes:


> i think that is right, johnny. you don't just "go get it"
> it "just happens" if you are on the right part of the curve.
>

i don't think anybody is suggesting that you have to "go get it". this is all
in the plan of god. it's not that we have to do anything... i think what
ellen is saying is, that some changes may be taking place in our bodies at
this time. we are not making it or willing it to happen,its just happening.
other ( strange and unusual) changes are happening, why not this?
as far as it being impossible, may i just say this:
"nothing is impossible with god"

scientists need to remember this...

barbara


[non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[mizbabzie@...]

in a message dated 11/25/02 5:39:38 pm pacific standard time,
david@... (/group/asc2k/post?postid=9rf4sycggmdpr9l4-bedzavxxlth6jxhbgp0xf137zerr2aqtbsw5aemzta3f6sjzuj doyvdxmc7yvpernmo1g) writes:


> the best sources i've found so far is the work of dr. glen
> rein, which showed that loving energy expands the dna molecule thus
> allowing
> more evolution and healing to occur,

***************
ok, see..this is what i'm saying.

our bodies can change...and that change does not have to (necessarily)
conform to current scientific theories.
ps.......its nice that there are some "unscientific" people on this board to
keep you people in line..lol..
just kidding :))


[non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Johnny]

q'uo suggests dna is not related to density or prospect for ascension:

carla: ... i've had three different people say to me in the last two
weeks that humankind needs more dna than it has and something must be
done to improve the dna structure or humankind won't make it out of
third density into the fourth and will be, as a group, stuck here
repeating and repeating. the model that all three of these people
have used is that we don't have it and we need to go out and get it.
they are referring to extra strands of dna that would enable us to do
this and that. my model of it and the one that i feel at this point
is more correct by far is that we have everything that we need and
it's been turned off. we just have to find the place to allow it to
be turned on again. of those two models would you have an opinion as
to which one is more accurate, or would you feel that this is even a
valid concern at all?

peace & love, john

q'uo: ... as third-density beings your mind/body/spirit complex has
been equipped with all the necessary prerequisites for utilizing the
catalyst of this choice-making density. it is not that you need more
equipment but to refer to your owner's manual. the answers are in
your heart, not in your dna. [source: l/l research channeling session
on 2-24-02, at
http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/issues/2002/2002_0224.htm]

--- in asc2k@y..., ellen botelho <getdebugged@y...> wrote:
> david w., i can understand your point, but the article does quote
hard evidence: "dr. fox has proven through blood tests that some
people have actually developed new strands of dna." could it be
that this extra dna is what allows the dense physical part of us to
be transformed at will, to higher density? (thus into light
beings?) i say this respectfully, as i have not done the amount of
research, and lightwork, channeling, etc., that you have. i wonder
if at another point of transition, does the actual dna become a moot
point, but for the jump from 3d to 4d, is it still needed? perhaps
dr. fox needs to present the actual test results.
> just wondering! blessings to you all; i am learning so much from
all of you. thanks.
> much love,
> ellen

[David Wilcock]

from: "ellen botelho"

> david w., i can understand your point, but the article does quote hard
evidence: "dr. fox has proven through blood tests that some people have
actually developed new strands of dna."

dw: well, dear ellen, not to be contentious but this is far from "hard
evidence." where is the footnote? there is none. where is this published? we
don't know if it is or not. this is a "take my word for it" statement, and
therefore lacks any of the criteria for scientific proof. this is not to
split hairs but to simply keep the arguments at a level that remain high in
their integrity. the best sources i've found so far is the work of dr. glen
rein, which showed that loving energy expands the dna molecule thus allowing
more evolution and healing to occur, and colm kelleher's paper
"retrotransposons as agents of human evolution," something like that. this
second one refers to the idea of "jumping dna" as the key factor, which i
will mention in part two of divine cosmos. there's still time to dig up
something more concrete in the way of a published, documented study about a
third strand of dna, though, if such a study does indeed exist. this isn't
it.

peace be with you -

- david

[jha_amin]

--- in asc2k@y..., "johnny" <johnnypi@y...> wrote:
> q'uo suggests dna is not related to density or prospect for
ascension:

i think that is right, johnny. you don't just "go get it"
it "just happens" if you are on the right part of the curve.

[Clark stewart]

hey dw, that is a smashing article on octe clusters, wow rj should be pretty
stooked.
with regards to the triple helix, isn't there a patent issued for it..?
maybe someone could find that , i haven't had much luck with the patent
searches.
then once the patent is found the researchers could be tracked down, to see
if anything new has popped up.
on another note, we may want to keep our eyes open, as some performance gear
is about to drop.
uaf 1035 ...this was the inscription on a ufo disc that appeared in a dream,
it crashed into the side of a 7-11 building.
as expected , the military cleaned up w/i minutes, and 7-11 was converted
into a base.
{corporate take-over, vis the military..hmmm}

peace be within you all,
clark
>
>


__________________________________________________ _______________
msn 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. get 2 months free*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

[Rod Johnson]

clark,

you are a living example of einstein's wonder that curiosity could survive
formal education.

you wrote:
>hey dw, that is a smashing article on octe clusters, wow rj should be pretty
>stooked.

yes, i am studying that now and have some insights that i will share soon.

also there are some things on the triple helix that i may get to also.

rod

>__________________________________________________ _______________
>msn 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. get 2 months free*.
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>
>
>
>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>asc2k-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=picoimcobruqye9gpe8kkon3-b_odewlzeyprr7bl91rkklwzi-hfnlrul1r7e-l1m6erwegei9rpmhfghjqfpoontf01iptvpck)
>
>
>
>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/