PDA

View Full Version : Misinformation Found / Comment / Al Gore / 9/11/2001


Tony P.
11-15-2002, 01:49 AM
Misinformation Found
http://www.spiritweb.org/Spirit/kla-la-miller.html
That link leads to a page that is so contradicting of like the Ra
Material.

Comment
Just wanted to make a comment, nothing more.
White light is so beautiful.
The kind of white light I think is seen during a sneeze, or
involuntary action or something.
It's like the corner of your eye.
I don't know how it works, but I do know, whether people believe me
or not, that I do see it and it's not my imagination.
It's like white light exploding in rays.

Al Gore
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/DailyNews/TheNote.html

Pure illogical guesses with no basis on it at all.
And I stress this is pure illogical, and there is nothing backing
this up.
I base this on nothing.
And I stress that a lot
Here it goes.
If there is a terrorist attack, I can feel us feeling the effects
from it during Thanksgiving.

9/11/2001
I find it weird that McMoneagle mentioned September 2001.
And I hope I don't get in trouble for copying a section of the
paragraph from the book, but I feel it's important and McMoneagle
would agree it would be best to change things for the best by letting
this get out.
"probably actually starting around September 2001" pg. 179 The
Ultimate Time Machine
Let's see. 9/11 is 39 days after a change on TWZ.
A) Dec 7th, 2001 minus Aug 2nd, 2001 equals 127 days on the TWZ graph.
B) Dec 25th, 2002 minus August 18th, 2002 equals 129 days on the TWZ
graph.
Those are sections I'm looking at.
Now, if it was about 39 days after a change from the beginning of A,
that brings us to Nov 15th/16th 39 days before the end of B.
Wow, what a surprise that was. 9/11 of 2001 could be the first, and
11/16 of 2002 could be the other since 11/16 reversed looks similar.
Hopefully it's stopped though, and hopefully I will only find out if
I'm right if whoever stops it decides to release the information.
But then again, it could go by percentages and stuff, even though
it's pretty close.
Chances are I have some error in the above, but it's pretty close in
estimation.

Tony P.
11-15-2002, 04:02 AM
I'm reply to my post to update some stuff I thought of. I've been
careful with how many times I've posted before as you can check out,
so a double post per day now and then still may lead to less than or
equal to one post per day average.

I just thought of something. If 9/11 was significant because it's
relation to 911, the number you dial for emergency, so could 11/16.
Since 911 is in 11/16 flipped around, and I'll explain the extra one
in a moment. The 11 in 9/11 symbolized the Twin Towers. So maybe in
11/16, or 91/11 looked flipped around, or 9111 with the / removed,
the extra one could symbolize another tall building, in addition to
the two ones in 91/11 already. That tower, after reading David's
post, I think it could possibly be the Sears tower in Chicago.


> 9/11/2001
> I find it weird that McMoneagle mentioned September 2001.
> And I hope I don't get in trouble for copying a section of the
> paragraph from the book, but I feel it's important and McMoneagle
> would agree it would be best to change things for the best by
letting
> this get out.
> "probably actually starting around September 2001" pg. 179 The
> Ultimate Time Machine
> Let's see. 9/11 is 39 days after a change on TWZ.
> A) Dec 7th, 2001 minus Aug 2nd, 2001 equals 127 days on the TWZ
graph.
> B) Dec 25th, 2002 minus August 18th, 2002 equals 129 days on the
TWZ
> graph.
> Those are sections I'm looking at.
> Now, if it was about 39 days after a change from the beginning of
A,
> that brings us to Nov 15th/16th 39 days before the end of B.
> Wow, what a surprise that was. 9/11 of 2001 could be the first, and
> 11/16 of 2002 could be the other since 11/16 reversed looks similar.
> Hopefully it's stopped though, and hopefully I will only find out
if
> I'm right if whoever stops it decides to release the information.
> But then again, it could go by percentages and stuff, even though
> it's pretty close.
> Chances are I have some error in the above, but it's pretty close
in
> estimation.

Erik Strasser
11-15-2002, 04:39 AM
Misinformation Found
http://www.spiritweb.org/Spirit/kla-la-miller.html
That link leads to a page that is so contradicting of like the Ra Material.

ES: Another try from the Illuminati ( and there counsil of nine) to discredit
RA.
Does anyone remember the movie Stargate? That was also done to discredit RA and
to make RA look bad.
To be more precise... Stargate was a COUNTERFEIT in which they made RA the
Draconian energy-eating entity.
It just happens to be the other way around!

See how deep the rabit-hole goes?

Love you all, Erik.







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]