which Seth Speaks? [Archive] - Divine Cosmos Discussions

Clark stewart

11-10-2000, 11:39 AM

Jer,

Seth speaks, by Jane Roberts-The enternal validity of the soul-
ISBN 1-878424-07-6
Haven't read it yet, went on a mad book buying spree and am backed up to ,
like 8 books...
Well winter up here = lots of book reading time.

Peace and Love,
Clark

>From: "Jeremy Weiland" <jweiland@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=B4Au8LMT5IzZVZEjwSfVqkV0nnYu2D1i9yvuTb fmxnC3JjZUraIzn-dA-jar2YFXqY-eJ5eJRH-xqSAa2PaZoA)>
>Reply-To: asc2k@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=KuLh7g8LYp8D85k0qGF-l-aOaniYI-Y3qHq9rwyF5KnK50fY9ySiJEpuWG8GyRPQGddJYGM48v1ax4mA )
>To: <asc2k@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=KuLh7g8LYp8D85k0qGF-l-aOaniYI-Y3qHq9rwyF5KnK50fY9ySiJEpuWG8GyRPQGddJYGM48v1ax4mA )>
>Subject: [asc2k] which Seth Speaks?
>Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 16:43:14 -0500
>
>Hey, y'all help me out. I'm trying to buy that book Seth Speaks by Jane
>Roberts and there's like 10 different books called Seth Speaks? Do you
>know
>what the full title of the one David mentioned in his required reading is?
>Thanks,
>Jeremy
>
>

__________________________________________________ _______________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

Jeremy Weiland

11-10-2000, 01:43 PM

Hey, y'all help me out. I'm trying to buy that book Seth Speaks by Jane
Roberts and there's like 10 different books called Seth Speaks? Do you know
what the full title of the one David mentioned in his required reading is?
Thanks,
Jeremy

David Wilcock

11-10-2000, 03:10 PM

<table bgColor="#ffffff">
>A Seth by any other name is still the same. It's been released in different forms, hardcover, paperback and all sorts of different cover art. The latest editions are larger than the typical paperback pocket book and have an airy, pastel cover.
>
>- David
<blockquote style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: Jeremy Weiland (jweiland@nettalon.com)
style="FONT: 10pt arial">To: asc2k@egroups.com
style="FONT: 10pt arial">Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 4:43 PM
style="FONT: 10pt arial">Subject: [asc2k] which Seth Speaks?
>
<tt>Hey, y'all help me out. I'm trying to buy that book Seth Speaks by Jane
Roberts and there's like 10 different books called Seth Speaks? Do you know
what the full title of the one David mentioned in his required reading is?
Thanks,
Jeremy

</tt>

<tt>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>
</blockquote>

Jeremy Weiland

11-10-2000, 03:28 PM

<table bgColor="#ffffff">
>So is the "Seth Material" the complete title of the "original" book? Is that the one I should start on? I'm looking for a *title* tothe book you recommended... sorry to be so anal, but I can't figure out which one to buy on Amazon dot com. which one did you mean?
>Peazzout,
>Jeremy
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
>-----Original Message-----
From: David Wilcock <djw333@exis.net>
To: asc2k@egroups.com <asc2k@egroups.com>
Date: Friday, November 10, 2000 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [asc2k] which Seth Speaks?


>A Seth by any other name is still the same. It's been released in different forms, hardcover, paperback and all sorts of different cover art. The latest editions are larger than the typical paperback pocket book and have an airy, pastel cover.
>
>- David
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: Jeremy Weiland (jweiland@nettalon.com)
style="FONT: 10pt arial">To: asc2k@egroups.com
style="FONT: 10pt arial">Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 4:43 PM
style="FONT: 10pt arial">Subject: [asc2k] which Seth Speaks?
>
<tt>Hey, y'all help me out. I'm trying to buy that book Seth Speaks by Jane
Roberts and there's like 10 different books called Seth Speaks? Do you know
what the full title of the one David mentioned in his required reading is?
Thanks,
Jeremy

</tt>

<tt>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>
</blockquote>

<tt>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>
</blockquote>

David Wilcock

11-10-2000, 03:51 PM

<table bgColor="#ffffff">
>"The Seth Material" is an earlier book that was written by Jane consciously, and tells you the story of how the contact got started. It certainly has some interesting information in it, but Seth Speaks is the next book, and it is dictated entirely by Seth. It is a total paradigm-blaster that completely will change the way you think about the Universe. Highly recommended.
>
>- David
<blockquote style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: Jeremy Weiland (jweiland@nettalon.com)
style="FONT: 10pt arial">To: asc2k@egroups.com
style="FONT: 10pt arial">Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 6:28 PM
style="FONT: 10pt arial">Subject: Re: [asc2k] which Seth Speaks?
>

>So is the "Seth Material" the complete title of the "original" book? Is that the one I should start on? I'm looking for a *title* tothe book you recommended... sorry to be so anal, but I can't figure out which one to buy on Amazon dot com. which one did you mean?
>Peazzout,
>Jeremy
<blockquote style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid">
>-----Original Message-----
From: David Wilcock <djw333@exis.net>
To: asc2k@egroups.com <asc2k@egroups.com>
Date: Friday, November 10, 2000 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [asc2k] which Seth Speaks?


>A Seth by any other name is still the same. It's been released in different forms, hardcover, paperback and all sorts of different cover art. The latest editions are larger than the typical paperback pocket book and have an airy, pastel cover.
>
>- David
<blockquote style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: Jeremy Weiland (jweiland@nettalon.com)
style="FONT: 10pt arial">To: asc2k@egroups.com
style="FONT: 10pt arial">Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 4:43 PM
style="FONT: 10pt arial">Subject: [asc2k] which Seth Speaks?
>
<tt>Hey, y'all help me out. I'm trying to buy that book Seth Speaks by Jane
Roberts and there's like 10 different books called Seth Speaks? Do you know
what the full title of the one David mentioned in his required reading is?
Thanks,
Jeremy

</tt>

<tt>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>
</blockquote>

<tt>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>
</blockquote>

<tt>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>
</blockquote>

John Mirehiel

11-10-2000, 06:26 PM

Jeremy,

First, let me thank you for your response to my first post. And I do
hope that you get to drop in on our site soon.

Secondly, in regard to the Seth books, Iwould recommend, as has
David, at least four of Jane Roberts' work:
The Seth Material
Seth Speaks, The Eternal Validity of the Soul
The Nature of Personal Reality, and
The Nature of the Psyche: Its Human Expression.

Certainly start with the "Material," as it is a very sound intro to
the larger body of Seth's work. Those materials, along with "The
Urantia Book," were seminal on my own spiritual path, and I highly
recommend them.

Good hunting,
Johnny

--- In asc2k@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=ryjBOjTlDdPqRllV62Im9qQrzX5fVEpa8p_WDy Mogt0-owilKM2P4odkm8qDsBenW91SLSmbzi7i5Q), "Jeremy Weiland" <jweiland@n...> wrote:
> Hey, y'all help me out. I'm trying to buy that book Seth Speaks by
Jane
> Roberts and there's like 10 different books called Seth Speaks? Do
you know
> what the full title of the one David mentioned in his required
reading is?
> Thanks,
> Jeremy

Rod Johnson

11-12-2000, 01:39 AM

Hamish,

Are you looking for a subjective treatment that reiterates Old Testament
and/or eclectic Scenarios. Or perhaps are you looking for an objective
treatment that adds modern insights. As a scholar of the Bible and
metaphysics I think that Ascension2000 is doing objectively a great job
already. David Wilcock uses the term Ascension to imply collective
consciousness and its future role in reshaping creation.

My point is, that our present quest for understanding reality creation can
edify the earliest writings, the deepest thought consciousness and God
speculations on reality creation without demeaning or exonerating them in
any way. An atheist can have a precise understanding of reality creation
that does not contradict Genesis.

Creation events all have proto-essence within a connective matrix of thought
information. My term is the mental matrix. The information is finite and
succinct. Each human mind and indeed all mind is an integral part of that
matrix of thought information. No single or collective mind capacity can
span and perceive or conceive the whole of creation events.

I am an author of a new science. Within that science are the fundamentals of
matrix form and information. Every thought has three fundamental components.
1) light, 2) form or shape, and 3) force. Creation events that exist are the
manifestation collective life thought expression. But low, collective
thought expression is not limited to H-Sapiens.

As a matter of point, I believe that what keeps life reality creation on
track is the existent single mindedness of living cells. Perhaps trees and
grasses are collectively doing the greatest work.

Rod Deebokonon

-----Original Message-----
From: Hamish@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=DgC39wjhCexR86J4-H2b-Het1Iz87S2d0qtRrnNFphtAh-Y39YXjjbm91b_ahinIMqjI8X1ngfIU1U3r5wtIWfg) [mailto:Hamish@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=DgC39wjhCexR86J4-H2b-Het1Iz87S2d0qtRrnNFphtAh-Y39YXjjbm91b_ahinIMqjI8X1ngfIU1U3r5wtIWfg)]
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 2:57 AM
To: asc2k@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=sP1pP11Zp6xv6bgIB9teY3om3qzHHzCQTHUAOm 6k8QJAOz9OlwRmCRupvNCILh3OSdWNyoPM16o2)
Subject: Re: [asc2k] which Seth Speaks?

Jeremy, one of the series you must read is "The Nature of Personal
Reality". Reality creation is one of the fundamental tenets of
Cayce, Seth and many others. I am hanging on waiting to see if it
arises in the Ascenscion 2000 material. Curiously it hasn't.
Basically the theory is that we each individually and collectively
create the physical reality, events etc that we experience.

Hamish
__________________________________________________ ________
Aspirant Metaphysicist, Imagineer, Realitician, Outsider

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=jKNp1hBSI9z_CKGxg3incizeBbGiFn4YD722Nk qcyKblGjn79vQc8K9HdUpVrAdW8hdgfYm_XhlYPxN2bHwxSsiI _w)

Hamish Gunn

11-12-2000, 02:56 AM

Jeremy, one of the series you must read is "The Nature of Personal
Reality". Reality creation is one of the fundamental tenets of
Cayce, Seth and many others. I am hanging on waiting to see if it
arises in the Ascenscion 2000 material. Curiously it hasn't.
Basically the theory is that we each individually and collectively
create the physical reality, events etc that we experience.

Hamish
__________________________________________________ ________
Aspirant Metaphysicist, Imagineer, Realitician, Outsider

Hamish Gunn

11-18-2000, 12:14 PM

You (Rod Johnson) wrote:

> Hamish,
>
> Are you looking for a subjective treatment that reiterates Old Testament
> and/or eclectic Scenarios.
Wow Rod - run that by me again in simpler terms! I'm not looking for
a subjective treatment but an objective treatment. Subjectivity means
one man's opinion is as good as another's. Which Old Testament
Scenario did _you_ have in mind since I had none? What the heck is an
"eclectic scenario"? A scenario chosen to please from a variety of
sources? If one is open-minded then I think eclecticism is likely to
be a twin trait. No-one has all the answers and I think many people
cherry-pick from their studies.

>Or perhaps are you looking for an objective
> treatment that adds modern insights.

No I'm not looking for anything specific Rod. I suppose my curiosity
was wondering to what degree reality creation was a factor in
ascension. In my reading of Cayce and Seth this was a major "item" in
their metaphysics. I suppose it is a bit like taking a course in one
art form and wondering what other art forms one has studied may be
influences. As such one awaits without expectation.

> As a scholar of the Bible and
> metaphysics I think that Ascension2000 is doing objectively a great job
> already. David Wilcock uses the term Ascension to imply collective
> consciousness and its future role in reshaping creation.
>
There is no implied criticism of any perceived absence, by me.
However I've yet to see Ascension2000 refer to the reality creation
espoused by Cayce and Seth. My interpretation of A2K is one of a soul
set moving "onwards" based on external factors such as cycles, the
nature of the universe. You'll have to provide me with pointers to
where the matierial implies "collective consciousness and its future
role in reshaping creation". I've read pretty well most of it and
I've seen no evidence of that.

> My point is, that our present quest for understanding reality creation can
> edify the earliest writings, the deepest thought consciousness and God
> speculations on reality creation without demeaning or exonerating them in
> any way.
If I understand you correctly (and I'll admit your way of writing is
somewhat difficult to me), you are saying
our present quest...can benefit spiritually/improve morally the
earliest writings. How does a quest improve writings?
...can benefit our deepest thought consciousness - ok perhaps you mean
thinking about reality creation aids our thought processes - I'm not
sure how it does any more than other things we think about though.
...can benefit God speculations (What is a "God speculation? Do you
mean speculations _by_ God or _about_ God?)
... without demeaning them - so by thinking about reality creation we
are not demeaning anything - uh yes what made you think they would?
...without exonerating them - that is without freeing them from blame,
but what blame do you mean?

> An atheist can have a precise understanding of reality creation
> that does not contradict Genesis.
>
You would have to define what _you_ mean by reality creation before I
could debate this one. You'd have to clarify if you mean the "God
created heaven and Earth in seven days" kind of reality creation. Of
course I'd expect our reality creation to be similar in nature to
God's. The belief of otherwise in God would of course not be a factor
in the mechamism behind reality creation.

> Creation events all have proto-essence within a connective matrix of thought
> information.
I would say creation is a process primarily. What is created is the
event and for the purposes of this discussion, not so relevent.
What is primitive (proto) about the essence? What is the essence?
What do you mean by thought information?

> My term is the mental matrix. The information is finite and
> succinct. Each human mind and indeed all mind is an integral part of that
> matrix of thought information. No single or collective mind capacity can
> span and perceive or conceive the whole of creation events.
>
What about God? What about the beings at levels between ourselves and
ATI. How do you measure/evaluate your hypothesis (No single or
collective...) ?

> I am an author of a new science.
So you are a scientist. Do you apply the scientific method? Do you
form hypotheses? Do you experiment?
> Within that science are the fundamentals of
> matrix form and information. Every thought has three fundamental components.
> 1) light, 2) form or shape, and 3) force. Creation events that exist are the
> manifestation collective life thought expression.
So what you mean is we create our own reality (straight from Seth).
That is, the reality we experience collectively is the result of our
collective creation. If you were inventing a new science then you
would have to define your vocabulary in stricter terms. Your three
components are defined in terms of physics terms.

What is light?
What is form/shape? (how many dimensions is it expressed in?)
What is force?

> But low, collective
> thought expression is not limited to H-Sapiens.
>
Define "low, collective thought expression".

Somehow I think Seth got there first and expresses it better.

> As a matter of point, I believe that what keeps life reality creation on
> track is the existent single mindedness of living cells. Perhaps trees and
> grasses are collectively doing the greatest work.
I'm guessing this is subjective opinion. As the author of a new
science, how would you go about confirming your hypothesis?

>
> Rod Deebokono
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hamish@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=lJcITTmnbL-mWWUzBltVsI2S_wg6boFeOK_wwcKtgz7e5-fXa78TFp3jrq_kqK3JYrQI_BUSIzgIsJ4jn8FsEt0) [mailto:Hamish@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=lJcITTmnbL-mWWUzBltVsI2S_wg6boFeOK_wwcKtgz7e5-fXa78TFp3jrq_kqK3JYrQI_BUSIzgIsJ4jn8FsEt0)]
> Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 2:57 AM
> To: asc2k@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=znFgmXz0hSZn-J9dOeqwXYffZtFICRC8IuNZVdsZ4j6kWZDKz34ziQAFge6tY0_ KCSx1KGHaQ9iA)
> Subject: Re: [asc2k] which Seth Speaks?
>
>
> Jeremy, one of the series you must read is "The Nature of Personal
> Reality". Reality creation is one of the fundamental tenets of
> Cayce, Seth and many others. I am hanging on waiting to see if it
> arises in the Ascenscion 2000 material. Curiously it hasn't.
> Basically the theory is that we each individually and collectively
> create the physical reality, events etc that we experience.
>
> Hamish
> __________________________________________________ ________
> Aspirant Metaphysicist, Imagineer, Realitician, Outsider
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=q9QgFRKoZ6ItIu89FEU4EWfvnY8hB-7_ZZGvi2Vv8LkZfeQtGMnY_uj1ZiiudCOUltrxQvKq5wa5sGd0 23p0rTDRzNy-HQ)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=q9QgFRKoZ6ItIu89FEU4EWfvnY8hB-7_ZZGvi2Vv8LkZfeQtGMnY_uj1ZiiudCOUltrxQvKq5wa5sGd0 23p0rTDRzNy-HQ)
>
>

Hamish
__________________________________________________ _____
Hamish Gunn Livingston, West Lothian, Scotland, UK

Rod Johnson

11-19-2000, 01:38 AM

Hamish,

I think that you are absolutly and exactly right on all points. I'm glad
that you got it.

Rod Johnson

-----Original Message-----
From: Hamish@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=5voD5HuJarNloL1Q7VQTwhjTXse93kwjDpTZoP kosPgUcep6VseeMgcu2xTAsZqiEH54hIkCKlxkg90A7g) [mailto:Hamish@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=5voD5HuJarNloL1Q7VQTwhjTXse93kwjDpTZoP kosPgUcep6VseeMgcu2xTAsZqiEH54hIkCKlxkg90A7g)]
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2000 12:15 PM
To: asc2k@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=ROqWfQXfGNunBkcca916Zy-Q-QmhzEE_uSSteFbnhyPMolDna7wwF9AQOaOjQ778J0xOFxXltRW hFw)
Subject: Re: [asc2k] which Seth Speaks?

You (Rod Johnson) wrote:

> Hamish,
>
> Are you looking for a subjective treatment that reiterates Old Testament
> and/or eclectic Scenarios.
Wow Rod - run that by me again in simpler terms! I'm not looking for
a subjective treatment but an objective treatment. Subjectivity means
one man's opinion is as good as another's. Which Old Testament
Scenario did _you_ have in mind since I had none? What the heck is an
"eclectic scenario"? A scenario chosen to please from a variety of
sources? If one is open-minded then I think eclecticism is likely to
be a twin trait. No-one has all the answers and I think many people
cherry-pick from their studies.

>Or perhaps are you looking for an objective
> treatment that adds modern insights.

No I'm not looking for anything specific Rod. I suppose my curiosity
was wondering to what degree reality creation was a factor in
ascension. In my reading of Cayce and Seth this was a major "item" in
their metaphysics. I suppose it is a bit like taking a course in one
art form and wondering what other art forms one has studied may be
influences. As such one awaits without expectation.

> As a scholar of the Bible and
> metaphysics I think that Ascension2000 is doing objectively a great job
> already. David Wilcock uses the term Ascension to imply collective
> consciousness and its future role in reshaping creation.
>
There is no implied criticism of any perceived absence, by me.
However I've yet to see Ascension2000 refer to the reality creation
espoused by Cayce and Seth. My interpretation of A2K is one of a soul
set moving "onwards" based on external factors such as cycles, the
nature of the universe. You'll have to provide me with pointers to
where the matierial implies "collective consciousness and its future
role in reshaping creation". I've read pretty well most of it and
I've seen no evidence of that.

> My point is, that our present quest for understanding reality creation can
> edify the earliest writings, the deepest thought consciousness and God
> speculations on reality creation without demeaning or exonerating them in
> any way.
If I understand you correctly (and I'll admit your way of writing is
somewhat difficult to me), you are saying
our present quest...can benefit spiritually/improve morally the
earliest writings. How does a quest improve writings?
...can benefit our deepest thought consciousness - ok perhaps you mean
thinking about reality creation aids our thought processes - I'm not
sure how it does any more than other things we think about though.
...can benefit God speculations (What is a "God speculation? Do you
mean speculations _by_ God or _about_ God?)
... without demeaning them - so by thinking about reality creation we
are not demeaning anything - uh yes what made you think they would?
...without exonerating them - that is without freeing them from blame,
but what blame do you mean?

> An atheist can have a precise understanding of reality creation
> that does not contradict Genesis.
>
You would have to define what _you_ mean by reality creation before I
could debate this one. You'd have to clarify if you mean the "God
created heaven and Earth in seven days" kind of reality creation. Of
course I'd expect our reality creation to be similar in nature to
God's. The belief of otherwise in God would of course not be a factor
in the mechamism behind reality creation.

> Creation events all have proto-essence within a connective matrix of
thought
> information.
I would say creation is a process primarily. What is created is the
event and for the purposes of this discussion, not so relevent.
What is primitive (proto) about the essence? What is the essence?
What do you mean by thought information?

> My term is the mental matrix. The information is finite and
> succinct. Each human mind and indeed all mind is an integral part of that
> matrix of thought information. No single or collective mind capacity can
> span and perceive or conceive the whole of creation events.
>
What about God? What about the beings at levels between ourselves and
ATI. How do you measure/evaluate your hypothesis (No single or
collective...) ?

> I am an author of a new science.
So you are a scientist. Do you apply the scientific method? Do you
form hypotheses? Do you experiment?
> Within that science are the fundamentals of
> matrix form and information. Every thought has three fundamental
components.
> 1) light, 2) form or shape, and 3) force. Creation events that exist are
the
> manifestation collective life thought expression.
So what you mean is we create our own reality (straight from Seth).
That is, the reality we experience collectively is the result of our
collective creation. If you were inventing a new science then you
would have to define your vocabulary in stricter terms. Your three
components are defined in terms of physics terms.

What is light?
What is form/shape? (how many dimensions is it expressed in?)
What is force?

> But low, collective
> thought expression is not limited to H-Sapiens.
>
Define "low, collective thought expression".

Somehow I think Seth got there first and expresses it better.

> As a matter of point, I believe that what keeps life reality creation on
> track is the existent single mindedness of living cells. Perhaps trees and
> grasses are collectively doing the greatest work.
I'm guessing this is subjective opinion. As the author of a new
science, how would you go about confirming your hypothesis?

>
> Rod Deebokono
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hamish@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=5voD5HuJarNloL1Q7VQTwhjTXse93kwjDpTZoP kosPgUcep6VseeMgcu2xTAsZqiEH54hIkCKlxkg90A7g) [mailto:Hamish@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=5voD5HuJarNloL1Q7VQTwhjTXse93kwjDpTZoP kosPgUcep6VseeMgcu2xTAsZqiEH54hIkCKlxkg90A7g)]
> Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 2:57 AM
> To: asc2k@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=ROqWfQXfGNunBkcca916Zy-Q-QmhzEE_uSSteFbnhyPMolDna7wwF9AQOaOjQ778J0xOFxXltRW hFw)
> Subject: Re: [asc2k] which Seth Speaks?
>
>
> Jeremy, one of the series you must read is "The Nature of Personal
> Reality". Reality creation is one of the fundamental tenets of
> Cayce, Seth and many others. I am hanging on waiting to see if it
> arises in the Ascenscion 2000 material. Curiously it hasn't.
> Basically the theory is that we each individually and collectively
> create the physical reality, events etc that we experience.
>
> Hamish
> __________________________________________________ ________
> Aspirant Metaphysicist, Imagineer, Realitician, Outsider
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=uFMENeMWK3wt0yehgdWTakfDOrK5sR9Jic6fIq XV5w6_PY0UdHo0c31gY67ql4zZWWJOTPhabnPd0q9pdNcNrv3R o5tF)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=uFMENeMWK3wt0yehgdWTakfDOrK5sR9Jic6fIq XV5w6_PY0UdHo0c31gY67ql4zZWWJOTPhabnPd0q9pdNcNrv3R o5tF)
>
>

Hamish
__________________________________________________ _____
Hamish Gunn Livingston, West Lothian, Scotland, UK

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=uFMENeMWK3wt0yehgdWTakfDOrK5sR9Jic6fIq XV5w6_PY0UdHo0c31gY67ql4zZWWJOTPhabnPd0q9pdNcNrv3R o5tF)