Jeremy Weiland
08-22-2002, 11:18 AM
Hey Tiffani,
As always my very humble opinion. All the other Ra
scholars, please tear me down if I'm screwing this up
(I know, I know, there are no mistakes, but then you
probably have never met me ;-P)
> Ok..you can all decide later whether it is good or
> bad that I am re-reading the RA books...cause I feel
> like I am virgin asc2k girl and will be posting alot
> of questions...Doomstar...want to create a club!
An "asc2k virgin", huh? Jeez, that brings to mind all
those images of what they do to "Rocky Horror Picture
Show virgins." Rest assured, everbody, we will not
write "virgin" on your forehead if you come to
Huntsville and aren't familiar with Ra <lol>.
> So the focus was always on unity...correct...and
> possibly the law of one was always an STO teaching
> so with it absorbed with minimal distortions
> polarity towards STO would be natural, thus reaching
> ascension percentages?
I had this problem way back early in the list (go back
and check the archives to see me get smacked down)
where I said that Ra was not trying to get people to
be STO or STS, since they are without polarity. Well,
it is true that they are without polarity, but it is
quite obvious that they are trying to bring about a
positive harvest.
Well then why would they care whether positive or
negative, since all is one? Two reasons. One, the
positive path is much more efficient and there is less
net suffering involved. The negative path is all
about suffering, chiefly because of reason 2. Which
is, the negative path, as Ra puts it, is the path of
that which is not. It is the path of division,
separation, all of which is *not real*. Now, my
highest understanding of the creation is that the
creator engages in this *illusion* of separation in
order to learn about itself. The positive path uses
this illusion to learn about the real aspect of
itself, the unity of all, that which *is real*. So
the closer an entity follows the law of one, the
closer that entity interacts with reality as opposed
to illusion. And of course we are speaking in
absolute terms, not merely 3D terms.
Now it is my opinion that since the positive path is
the path of reality, since unity is the true nature of
God, that Ra in their unpolarized, 6D state would
naturally seem to act positively *from our polarized
point of view*. This tells me that the law of One,
which they follow and teach, is much more consonant
with the positive path than the negative path (but
from another perspective, this is wrong: both paths
deal with the law of One. Going against a law and
experiencing the consequences of that action proves
that the law exists just as much as following that
law). So yes, I would say that the law of One is an
STO teaching in that conscious acceptance of the fact
that all is one is conducive to positive polarization
and harvest.
However, negatives also use the law of One, since it
is impossible to exist and not interact with the
oneness of all (hopefully I'm not getting too
esoteric). So from that point of view it makes sense
when Ra says that the law of One is open to both the
negative and positive paths. Only the perspective
from which each is viewed lends the polarization; not
the law itself. However, since the positive path is
more in line with reality (unity) than negativity is,
the law of One is understood better, maybe you could
say, or from a fuller understanding.
Hope this helps. Great topic!
L/L
Jeremy
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com
As always my very humble opinion. All the other Ra
scholars, please tear me down if I'm screwing this up
(I know, I know, there are no mistakes, but then you
probably have never met me ;-P)
> Ok..you can all decide later whether it is good or
> bad that I am re-reading the RA books...cause I feel
> like I am virgin asc2k girl and will be posting alot
> of questions...Doomstar...want to create a club!
An "asc2k virgin", huh? Jeez, that brings to mind all
those images of what they do to "Rocky Horror Picture
Show virgins." Rest assured, everbody, we will not
write "virgin" on your forehead if you come to
Huntsville and aren't familiar with Ra <lol>.
> So the focus was always on unity...correct...and
> possibly the law of one was always an STO teaching
> so with it absorbed with minimal distortions
> polarity towards STO would be natural, thus reaching
> ascension percentages?
I had this problem way back early in the list (go back
and check the archives to see me get smacked down)
where I said that Ra was not trying to get people to
be STO or STS, since they are without polarity. Well,
it is true that they are without polarity, but it is
quite obvious that they are trying to bring about a
positive harvest.
Well then why would they care whether positive or
negative, since all is one? Two reasons. One, the
positive path is much more efficient and there is less
net suffering involved. The negative path is all
about suffering, chiefly because of reason 2. Which
is, the negative path, as Ra puts it, is the path of
that which is not. It is the path of division,
separation, all of which is *not real*. Now, my
highest understanding of the creation is that the
creator engages in this *illusion* of separation in
order to learn about itself. The positive path uses
this illusion to learn about the real aspect of
itself, the unity of all, that which *is real*. So
the closer an entity follows the law of one, the
closer that entity interacts with reality as opposed
to illusion. And of course we are speaking in
absolute terms, not merely 3D terms.
Now it is my opinion that since the positive path is
the path of reality, since unity is the true nature of
God, that Ra in their unpolarized, 6D state would
naturally seem to act positively *from our polarized
point of view*. This tells me that the law of One,
which they follow and teach, is much more consonant
with the positive path than the negative path (but
from another perspective, this is wrong: both paths
deal with the law of One. Going against a law and
experiencing the consequences of that action proves
that the law exists just as much as following that
law). So yes, I would say that the law of One is an
STO teaching in that conscious acceptance of the fact
that all is one is conducive to positive polarization
and harvest.
However, negatives also use the law of One, since it
is impossible to exist and not interact with the
oneness of all (hopefully I'm not getting too
esoteric). So from that point of view it makes sense
when Ra says that the law of One is open to both the
negative and positive paths. Only the perspective
from which each is viewed lends the polarization; not
the law itself. However, since the positive path is
more in line with reality (unity) than negativity is,
the law of One is understood better, maybe you could
say, or from a fuller understanding.
Hope this helps. Great topic!
L/L
Jeremy
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com