time and RA

[Tiffani Boswell]

"However, we now feel the great responsibility of staying in the capacity of
removing the distortions and powers that have been given to the Law of One. We
will continue in this, until, shall we say, your cycle is appropriately ended.
If not this one, then the next. We are not a part of time and, thus, are able to
be with you in any of your times."

Ok..not sure if I want to start a whole TIME discussion again...cause I still
can't grasp that very well...

but the above is from session I with RA...
so if they can be with us in any of our times...Are they doing that right now? i
mean I guess they are if it is all one moment where they are...

but there is time/space where they are...correct? does anyone remember if they
described what time is like in other dimensions?

Tiffani



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[chris.hamilton2@...>]

but the session I with RA...
so if they can be with us in any of our times...Are they doing that right now? i
mean I guess they are if it is all one moment where they are...

Ok, me too. I mean, if Ra can be in any time, then it must be probable time,
because each moment can be changed by free will, so Ra is only in one possible
future if Ra is there, right? Well, Ra did say we wouldn't be able to understand
all of it while we were in 3D anyway :)So, that means that Ra must be able to be
in all possible futures at once? I won't even ask about the past :)Chris

[Jeremy Weiland]

Hey Tiffani and Chris,

> but the session I with RA...
> so if they can be with us in any of our times...Are
> they doing that right now? i mean I guess they are
> if it is all one moment where they are...

But *we're* in all times, too, just like Ra... we're
just not in all times in this mode of consciousness
that we're experiencing now. Because of that, we see
Ra acting over what seems to be a huge span of time
and doing things that seem impossible. But they're
acting from a different reality, a different mental
standpoint. There is no need for them to act "now" or
"then". They simply are. They interact with us in a
much more unified manner than we choose to percieve
it. And even the idea of "interaction" is probably
distorted, because they don't perceive the difference
between us and them.

It's a mind bender to think about.

> Ok, me too. I mean, if Ra can be in any time, then
> it must be probable time, because each moment can be
> changed by free will, so Ra is only in one possible
> future if Ra is there, right? Well, Ra did say we
> wouldn't be able to understand all of it while we
> were in 3D anyway :)So, that means that Ra must be
> able to be in all possible futures at once? I won't
> even ask about the past :)Chris

From our perspective, yes, Ra is in all probable
futures, pasts, etc. From their perspective, Ra just
is, for there is no separation of themselves. Since
they percieve separation from the creator not, they
don't need to actually "exist" per se in each differnt
probably reality. Think about it, the only reason we
need to experience probable futures, paths, etc is
because there are different ways that we (the creator
that is "in here," in our souls and our "individual"
identities) can interact with what is "out there"
(everything and everybody else). If you're already
one with all (which Ra isn't completely but they're
much closer than we are) it's not neccessary to make
things as complicated as thinking about probable
futures/pasts/etc. You just interact with another
part of the creator/self. It's part of you anyway,
right? So how can there be a difference or distance
between it and you of any type that is real?

As always, my humble opinion.

L/L

Jeremy

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com