Study guide

[greenlantern113]

> i can tell you also that in my first stages i was completely stunned
> by ra's message. i was crying (of joy and understanding) all the
> time when i was reading ra's study guide. and i still am sometimes.

i can tell you that i spent just about a year completely on the study
guide, without reading anything from the main text. this gave me a
chance to digest the concepts ra would be talking about ahead of time
of the actual dialogue, as sometimes the dialogue can be confusing.

l/l

jeremy

[David Wilcock]

from: "greenlantern113" <greenlantern113@... (/group/asc2k/post?postid=_lr7lh5csbmq_fyobwkhuim3xheypo84fogctu zjwkwpskj20yuuu8jfpao3izxn1ib8sarjiphe2vg67ewki5-jlq)>

> i can tell you that i spent just about a year completely on the study
> guide, without reading anything from the main text. this gave me a
> chance to digest the concepts ra would be talking about ahead of time
> of the actual dialogue, as sometimes the dialogue can be confusing.

dw: no doubt this is true. in my early 1996 days with the material, i got
into the habit of always checking whether ra agreed with elkins first before
i read the questions. otherwise, you'd invariably start agreeing with elkins
and think he was right, only to once again have him get the "smackdown" from
ra - and if you knew in advance that a question was going to be wrong, you
could pay better attention to why that might be teh case.

peace be with you -

- david