(Doomstars) Now I understand why heavier things....

[doomstars]

now i understand why heavier things fall faster than lighter things
after reading some of the other ra material on llresearch.org. by the
way, don't say heavier things don't fall faster and fall at the same
rate cause mathematically it has been proved, but it only falls
faster in a very little difference in time.
unmeasurable. basically if you take object a and object b, and have a
trial between them, and compare it to a trial of object a and object
c, where b is denser than c, b should fall faster, or get to the
center of gravity faster or quicker than object c, by an unmeasurable
amount more. i mean, if b were like 20000000000000 tons, and c were
like 1 amu, the difference would be like
0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000001

i worked it out with my physics teacher one year.
formula i am talking about it like force is equal to something like
the difference in masses over the difference in distance, or
something like that.

[Brian Cox]

no offense, but just because "you and your physics teacher" worked
it out doesnt mean "it has been proved".

please post these alleged equations that negate the gravitational
constant being a constant, if you're going to try to pass off
your theories as inscrutable facts.

-brian

ps david and rod: i'm still waiting on a definitive answer for how
you guys mathematically derived the fine structure constant.
(from chapter 4 of dc...the "if you want to test out the math
yourself" method makes no mathematical sense) to me, this
fine structure constant derivation is one of the largest breakthroughs
of this book, so a little explanation/proof would be great...if this
book goes mainstream, that little (huge) statement is going to be
the first thing physicists and mathematicians point out as flawed...


-----original message-----
from: doomstars [mailto:doomstars@... (/group/asc2k/post?postid=342c_izhig2aeu3sepi1j97mmflaoyjyykhcaq qvzmod2eka-xrbowa2kjddcdumaspanlmoeumvdwe3ici)]
sent: wednesday, august 07, 2002 4:29 pm
to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=5pdj4trl8clsxf6izvjffca7glpnuqh_0hrdgj 0l96jqaaz0zsgyikm7u_vmlb_jgvwjnizmsdphbkc)
subject: [asc2k] (doomstars) now i understand why heavier things....


now i understand why heavier things fall faster than lighter things
after reading some of the other ra material on llresearch.org. by the
way, don't say heavier things don't fall faster and fall at the same
rate cause mathematically it has been proved, but it only falls
faster in a very little difference in time.
unmeasurable. basically if you take object a and object b, and have a
trial between them, and compare it to a trial of object a and object
c, where b is denser than c, b should fall faster, or get to the
center of gravity faster or quicker than object c, by an unmeasurable
amount more. i mean, if b were like 20000000000000 tons, and c were
like 1 amu, the difference would be like
0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000001

i worked it out with my physics teacher one year.
formula i am talking about it like force is equal to something like
the difference in masses over the difference in distance, or
something like that.


yahoo! groups sponsor
advertisement



to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=eyklsdxxmylyuc1rmas1sznfbshw21bswwsqae 0dnlibz7sontpsf41mty43re9wsxiigbqm35r2nugvln6oeglx ic66tow9tfaqqq)



your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service.



[non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[doomstars]

i'll have my my former teacher rework it out with me when the school
year is back in session, and either we will work it out on paper and
scan it or just see if we can type it out, which is more difficult
than it sounds do to symbols used. like the square sign for example
and so on. p.s. they're not theories.


--- in asc2k@y..., brian cox <brian.cox@w...> wrote:
> no offense, but just because "you and your physics teacher" worked
> it out doesnt mean "it has been proved".
>
> please post these alleged equations that negate the gravitational
> constant being a constant, if you're going to try to pass off
> your theories as inscrutable facts.
>
> -brian
>
> ps david and rod: i'm still waiting on a definitive answer for how
> you guys mathematically derived the fine structure constant.
> (from chapter 4 of dc...the "if you want to test out the math
> yourself" method makes no mathematical sense) to me, this
> fine structure constant derivation is one of the largest
breakthroughs
> of this book, so a little explanation/proof would be great...if this
> book goes mainstream, that little (huge) statement is going to be
> the first thing physicists and mathematicians point out as flawed...
>
>
> -----original message-----
> from: doomstars [mailto:doomstars@y...]
> sent: wednesday, august 07, 2002 4:29 pm
> to: asc2k@y...
> subject: [asc2k] (doomstars) now i understand why heavier
things....
>
>
> now i understand why heavier things fall faster than lighter
things
> after reading some of the other ra material on llresearch.org. by
the
> way, don't say heavier things don't fall faster and fall at the
same
> rate cause mathematically it has been proved, but it only falls
> faster in a very little difference in time.
> unmeasurable. basically if you take object a and object b, and
have a
> trial between them, and compare it to a trial of object a and
object
> c, where b is denser than c, b should fall faster, or get to the
> center of gravity faster or quicker than object c, by an
unmeasurable
> amount more. i mean, if b were like 20000000000000 tons, and c
were
> like 1 amu, the difference would be like
>
0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
>
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
>
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
>
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
>
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
>
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
>
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
> 0000000000000000000000000000000000001
>
> i worked it out with my physics teacher one year.
> formula i am talking about it like force is equal to something
like
> the difference in masses over the difference in distance, or
> something like that.
>
>
> yahoo! groups sponsor
> advertisement
>
>
>
> to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> asc2k-unsubscribe@y...
>
>
>
> your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of
service.
>
>
>
> [non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[amstelland420@...]

what is this drivel? in a vacuum all things fall at the same rate according
to the specific gravity they are exposed to. even a feather in a vacuum will
fall as fast as a 2 ton safe. density has nothing to do with it. please
investigate your science before clogging my e-mail with this banter.

note:
in the medium of air ( our atmosphere)
certain shapes, density, and vector can augment the effect of gravity, making
it seem as though gravity acts on said objects differently.


[non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[doomstars]

fine, believe what you wish.

--- in asc2k@y..., amstelland420@a... wrote:
> what is this drivel? in a vacuum all things fall at the same rate
according
> to the specific gravity they are exposed to. even a feather in a
vacuum will
> fall as fast as a 2 ton safe. density has nothing to do with it.
please
> investigate your science before clogging my e-mail with this
banter.
>
> note:
> in the medium of air ( our atmosphere)
> certain shapes, density, and vector can augment the effect of
gravity, making
> it seem as though gravity acts on said objects differently.
>
>
> [non-text portions of this message have been removed]