PDA

View Full Version : Cetacean emergencies



Tarzan
08-02-2002, 11:05 PM
group,

<rolling my rock-front door of my cave>whooo
boy, the sun is bright.

my, my, so may e-mails. i belong to several
lists, all of which are in subjects dear to
me and when the all are very active, i am
absolutely snowed in with e-mails. sheesh.
of course i could unsub and go back to
scribbling on stones, but then i'd have a
dearth of information.

anyway...i hope that david could spare some
time and address the issue of our cetacean
friends. as many of you probably know, there
have been many thousands of dolphins, whales
and squid beaching themselves--just when the
blasted, bloody navy got their "take" permit
and started doing their awful super-loud
sonars, something like 200+ decibles. ouch.
the navy doesn't give a rat's ass about the
"fish" in the seas, but we the people do; i
suspect that they are doing this horrible
thing not only for their own selfish military
aims, but also to try to eliminate our
cetacean friends from the seas (on orders
from the dark brotherhood), thus making it
more challenging for our ascension to happen.

i do trust that anything that is allowed
(allowed by our benevolent federation
guardians) to happen would be within the
great plan, thus i am very confident that the
serious gloom/doom senarios won't happen in
such ways that would jeopardize our ascension
process.

still i do love our friends of the seas and
wish to know more about what's going on with
all these beachings and what we can do in our
visions/mediations about this issue? perhaps
some of us who have established good
meditation track records with low distortion
rates could post some insights into what's
going on with our ocean friends?

one senario is that the navy is blasting the
critters so hard that they are beaching
themselves in efforts to escape the
destructive sounds and to alert us to this
effect; another senario is that the planetary
magnetic grid is rapidly changing and they
are beaching themselves in directional
confusion. perhaps it's both; perhaps
there's more? david--if it is worth your
time to comment on this, i'll be grateful.

seth


[non-text portions of this message have been removed]