The "Haves" lost 2.6 trillion last year

[Jeremy Weiland]

From the latest Wilcock article:

"The scope of disaster in this dream seems to be
saying that a totally unprecedented amount of wealth
will just be erased off the screen in the US."

"The haves and the have-nots will be on an equal par
with each other, and this does then indicate to what
degree the changes will have to be met."

With that in mind:

<a href="http://channels.netscape.com/ns/news/ns/story.jsp?floc=FF-PLS-PLS&id=403781107&dt=20020707190200&w=RTR&coview=">http://channels.netscape.com/ns/news/ns/story.jsp?floc=FF-PLS-PLS&id=403781107&d\
t=20020707190200&w=RTR&coview=</a>

FYI...

Peace,

Jeremy



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com

[ctx82003]

Jeremy,

When you consider that overall "haves" wealth is on the magnitude of
$400 trillion -- this $2.6 trillion is meaningless to them.

The true damage has been done purposely by the "haves" to the "have
littles" or "have nots" as they, (the "haves") solidify their grasp
on the natural resources and productive capacity of this planet.

They now have all the "stans" and the oil and gas fields and are
ready to turn the oil and gas fields of Iraq, Syria, Iran etc over to
Israel.

Have you noticed that as the U.S. suffers devastating fires in our
heartlands the "haves" are lighting up more of the Brazilian rain
forest this season as they are preparing to again greatly expand the
agricultural production of Brazil with its vertical integration of
production.

We live in some very twisted times.

Best Wishes,
Lorin



--- In asc2k@y..., Jeremy Weiland <greenlantern113@y...> wrote:
> From the latest Wilcock article:
>
> "The scope of disaster in this dream seems to be
> saying that a totally unprecedented amount of wealth
> will just be erased off the screen in the US."
>
> "The haves and the have-nots will be on an equal par
> with each other, and this does then indicate to what
> degree the changes will have to be met."
>
> With that in mind:
>
> http://channels.netscape.com/ns/news/ns/story.jsp?floc=FF-PLS-
PLS&id=403781107&dt=20020707190200&w=RTR&coview=
>
> FYI...
>
> Peace,
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
> http://sbc.yahoo.com

[greenlantern113]

> When you consider that overall "haves" wealth is on the magnitude
> of $400 trillion -- this $2.6 trillion is meaningless to them.

Well, I certainly wasn't trying to make the case that the haves are
on equal par with the have-nots (yet) - but that it is interesting
that they have lost so much, so quickly. That's a lot of wealth to
lose - I don't care who you are. Especially when you're supposed to
control the economy anyway :-)

Also, look where it was lost - financial sector, banking industry:
the engine of economic hegemony and growth. When international
banking goes, you can say goodbye to globalization; no economy can
withstand a loss of confidence in the banking industry.

I didn't make the post to advance any socially just cause, just
thought it was curious after reading David's article on Thursday.

Hope everybody had a happy fourth!

Jeremy

[ctx82003]

"When international banking goes you can say goodbye to
globalization"

Jeremy,

A good part of the planet Gaia hopes the above statement is true.

My comment was that the "haves" have engineered this whole financial
debacle in the stock markets.

When the market was making new highs there had to be a seller for
every buyer. The sellers were the "haves" and the buyers were the
CNBC junkies - "have nots".

But it does look like it is beginning to slide out of their control
in the banking industry. And the derivitates bomb is yet to
explode.

When Greenspan and Rubin testified for the repeal of the "Glass-
Steagal", and succeeded, the writing was on the wall. The "Glass-
Steagal" was put together by the criminals of the 29 era, like old
Joe Kennedy and his minions, who designed Glass - Steagal to foil
those who would attempt to circumvent the laws as they had done.

With its repeal the criminal element has thoroughly infiltrated the
financial system from the SEC and CFTC to the local brokerage houses
to the board rooms of corporate America. The other shoe is yet to
drop.

Best Wishes,
Lorin



--- In asc2k@y..., "greenlantern113" <greenlantern113@y...> wrote:
> > When you consider that overall "haves" wealth is on the magnitude
> > of $400 trillion -- this $2.6 trillion is meaningless to them.
>
> Well, I certainly wasn't trying to make the case that the haves are
> on equal par with the have-nots (yet) - but that it is interesting
> that they have lost so much, so quickly. That's a lot of wealth to
> lose - I don't care who you are. Especially when you're supposed
to
> control the economy anyway :-)
>
> Also, look where it was lost - financial sector, banking industry:
> the engine of economic hegemony and growth. When international
> banking goes, you can say goodbye to globalization; no economy can
> withstand a loss of confidence in the banking industry.
>
> I didn't make the post to advance any socially just cause, just
> thought it was curious after reading David's article on Thursday.
>
> Hope everybody had a happy fourth!
>
> Jeremy