11-8-03 Eclipse [Archive] - Divine Cosmos Discussions

William Foster

07-07-2002, 06:02 AM

<table bgColor="#ffffff">
>Chris wrote:
>What is interesting is that the majority of planets are in Sagittarius
(fire)and Taurus (earth) and they are at what we call "inconjunct" or
at a 150 degree angle. This angle could create a Pluto type effect
(regenerative, violent), meaning possible volcanic activity .

Chris
>
>I don't see it Chris. You have Pluto and Venus in Sagittarius and the Moon and North Node in Taurus. That's not majority and I see only one inconjunct aspect (Pluto 150 North Node at 1* 52' applying). I do agree with you that this eclipse could be violent in nature for the following reasons:
>
>
>Yes, this 11-8-03 eclipse has two grand trines in Earth and Water signs but the total chart (counting the strongest 30 aspects) has as many hard aspects as soft aspects. This is a "good/bad" chart not all light and roses.
>
>For example, the Saturn asc. is within 58 miles of NYC and is 135 degrees of Uranus (powerful in it's rulership sign and within 50' of exact) and Saturn is opposite Chiron (within 1* 3' of exact). The Saturn Asc and Chiron IC go through Syria, Jordan, Lebanon and Saudi Arabia.
>
>The Eclipse Sun Asc and Moon Dsc run right through Delhi, India within 37 miles and are opposite each other and both the Moon and Sun form a "T" square with Neptune. The Neptune IC goes through Pakistan and Afghanistan.
>
>Therefore, with equal soft and hard aspects the two grand trines can manifest in two ways:
>1. Air signs Plus: good communications, intellectual, logical, objective, broadminded and lacking in prejudice or Minus: cold and impractical.
>2. Earth signs Plus: dependable, conservative, cautious and good recuperative powers or Minus: dull and too materialistic.
>
>I don't see this eclipse has that great and certainly less powerful than the Aug.'99 grand cross eclipse.
>yours,
>Bill Foster
>