<table bgcolor="#ffffff">
><font face="arial" size="2">very cool that you sent this email to my box at 4:44. see it everyone? (scroll down)</font>
><font face="arial" size="2"></font>
><font face="arial" size="2">today is actually a very significant intersection of many planetary cycles... i had already let hoagland know about this in confidence... could have had a devastating market effect and i think the fed darn well knew it... this is the most dramatic proof yet that they are actively trying to manipulate against the natural cycles and prop up the economy. today they spontaneously reduced interest by a half percentage point to attack the cycle and it worked... for now. but just because today was the peak doesn't mean that the effect wears off tomorrow or the next day. </font>
><font face="arial" size="2"></font>
><font face="arial" size="2">regarding the grid map you are doing a great job so far... glad to see that you're making an effort to do something different. obviously a globe is a more difficult medium to work in, given the problems of spherical trigonometry and transferring the geometric proportions. everything looks relatively close; the only significant declinations from bh that i see are the node off rio de janeiro in brazil and the south african node. the sa node in particular should be about six degrees further east, and that discrepancy could be caused by a very slight angular misalignment in the overall projection, which i believe you created with europe as the central starting point. an ever-so-slight easterly rotation of the whole grid around that european nexus might fix everything up. there's also a slight difference in the length of the gridlines from where they need to be; you don't have enough room to square up the brazil and african nodes. the grid triangles needa very slight expansion in size. the brazil node is also off about the same, circa 4-6 degrees and a bit too high. that coastline should hug the grid. so most likely it's just a little bit off. slightly larger triangles and an extremely small angular rotation, some operation between those two, would square it all up.</font>
><font face="arial" size="2"></font>
><font face="arial" size="2">great job though... and a clock synchronicity to boot. don't take the precise answer as a criticism; this is very cool. </font>
><font face="arial" size="2"></font>
><font face="arial" size="2">now if you really are into it, no one yet has constructed a map of us regions where the bh grid is further broken down into all its harmonic subdivision lines and nodes. on a good projection it could be done relatively easily.europe has been done and it is printed in ag&wg. i'm sure a lot of us would thank you for that...</font>
><font face="arial" size="2"></font>
><font face="arial" size="2">we'll be mapping out the new grid once this all shakes down...</font>
><font face="arial" size="2"></font>
><font face="arial" size="2">peace be with you -</font>
><font face="arial" size="2"></font>
><font face="arial" size="2">- david</font>
<blockquote style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left: #000000 2px solid; margin-right: 0px">
style="font: 10pt arial">----- original message -----
style="background: #e4e4e4; font: 10pt arial; font-color: black">from: wouter hagens (wouter.hagens@pi.be)
style="font: 10pt arial">to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com
style="font: 10pt arial">sent: wednesday, april 18, 2001 4:44 pm
style="font: 10pt arial">subject: [asc2k] projection of grid on globe
>
<tt>as contribution for a web-page within http://www.biogeometry.org i have
created a projection of the hexakis icosahedron grid of bethe hagens and
william s. becker on the globe.
i just want to share this image with you.
if you think that the projection done is not correct, please let me know.
best regards,
wouter
</tt>
<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com
</tt>
<tt>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service (http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/).</tt>
</blockquote>