PDA

View Full Version : more about octaves



Cathy Gibson
03-10-2001, 09:19 AM
<table bgcolor="#ffffff">
>hello all;
>thankyou for your insights into these mysteries...i wanted to explore the idea of the octave describing the whole universe; according to mr. ouspensky; the whole universe is a system...the ray of creation...which includes all worlds and the absolute, but atour basic earthly level is three octaves or radiations.
>absolute - sun
>sun - earth
>earth - moon
>each "note" shows a certain layer of matter ( all matter being made of carbon, oxygen,notrogen and hydrogen) as it goes down the scale it becomes denser and denser. the lightest matter is on the level of"do". the quickest vibrations are also on the level "do", then they become slower and slower.
>he also asserts that vibrations are not regular, they develop, they slow down, they develop again, again slow down. this formula of uneven increase of vibrations was used for the musical scale. the octaves are divided into triads and between each triad there is an interval. he refers to it as a shock, or the absense of a shock...its very hard to interpret this understanding with the few books that i have, however, i want to address this idea of a "shock".he asserts that hydrogen passing through "forces" (sequential phases?)becomes either carbon, oxygen or nitrogen. is it possible that this could be considered the shocks he speaks of....or that can be represented by the lightening strikes. if you draw an analogy to the musical scale one can see that there is a halftone that correlates to the 666 or 6.5 ...the place where the shock takes place could it be theunmodulated ray ofcreation?he refersto the first shock as self-remembering. by the way rod, i have some knowledge of plasma fields etc. and im most interested in your experiments...maybe you could elaborate a little. i am aware of some work being done now, that may be of interest to you in this area.
>i feel that there must be a connection to the suns "solar max" and this shock...that creates an opportunity for self-remembering, and that is what we are seeing now on this planet.
>according to the pleiadians we experienced in 1993 what theyrefered to as the galactic tidal wave of light, which was translated through a planetary lineup that created a pathway of energies. each planet in our solar system has its own field of conciousness that pulsates and radiates raysof energies,like highways of data. this flood of cyclic energy is responsible for the rapid mutation that will take place withing the human species. we are changing or mutating through this energy, and our cells are becoming something different than theywere. aan alteration on a cellular level is catapulting us to a metamorphosis in the spiritual dimensions. the earth changes that occur as a result will finalize the shift in conciousness that is needed to restore sanity, purpose of living, and meaningful existence to dimensions that are to be home here on earth. ( from earth , pleiadian keys to the living library, by barbara marciniak) a book i highly recommend . this book was written in 1995, and predicted the solar activity we see now etc.
>has anyone out there read the pleiadian works? i would say they expand and clarify the information from ra , and whether or not you "believe" the information, much of what they say has unfolded. i personally have been hugely informed by this work, and it impacted me as much as the ra material.
>in love and light, cathy gibson

John Markey
03-11-2001, 03:24 PM
<table bgcolor="#ffffff">
><font face="arial" size="2"></font>
<blockquote style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left: #000000 2px solid; margin-right: 0px">
style="font: 10pt arial">----- original message -----
style="background: #e4e4e4; font: 10pt arial; font-color: black">from: cathy gibson (cgibson@sympatico.ca)
style="font: 10pt arial">to: asc2k (asc2k@yahoogroups.com)
style="font: 10pt arial">sent: saturday, march 10, 2001 11:19 am
style="font: 10pt arial">subject: [asc2k] more about octaves
>

>cathy wrote:
>"... he refers to it as a shock, or the absense of a shock...its very hard to interpret this understanding with the few books that i have, however, i want to address this idea of a "shock".he asserts that hydrogen passing through "forces" (sequential phases?)becomes either carbon, oxygen or nitrogen. "
>
><font face="arial" size="2"></font>
><font face="arial" size="2">cathy, this passage formerefers to fusion, which takes place in the stars. hydrogen fuses and its subsequent daughter elements continue up o iron 56 [i believe].</font>
><font face="arial" size="2"></font>
><font face="arial" size="2">john</font>
><font face="arial" size="2"></font>
></blockquote>

Rod Johnson
03-11-2001, 09:39 PM
<table bgcolor="#ffffff">
><font color="#0000ff" face="arial"><span class="470202204-12032001">john,</span></font>
><font color="#0000ff" face="arial"><span class="470202204-12032001"></span></font>
><span class="470202204-12032001"></span><font face="tahoma" size="2"><font size="3"><font color="#0000ff"><font face="arial">y<span class="470202204-12032001">our comment to cathy is interesting enough to me to ask for a little more. please eleborate on the "daughter elements" idea.</span></font></font></font></font>
><font face="tahoma" size="2"><font size="3"><font color="#0000ff"><font face="arial"><span class="470202204-12032001"></span></font></font></font></font>
><font face="tahoma" size="2"><font size="3"><font color="#0000ff"><font face="arial"><span class="470202204-12032001">fusion is the prime evidence that matter and space are an open inter-phase system rather than inertial particles in a closed system of atoms. </span></font></font></font></font>
><font face="tahoma" size="2"><font size="3"><font color="#0000ff"><font face="arial"><span class="470202204-12032001"></span></font></font></font></font>
><font face="tahoma" size="2"><font size="3"><font color="#0000ff"><font face="arial"><span class="470202204-12032001">but, fusion as a concept is extremely limited. in the final picture we will not be able to see electrons in atoms becoming... i assert that the new chemistry will see hydrogen and helium as the primary phase patterns through which the rest of the elements can be understood.</span></font></font></font></font>
><font face="tahoma" size="2"><font size="3"><font color="#0000ff"><font face="arial"><span class="470202204-12032001"></span></font></font></font></font>
><font face="tahoma" size="2"><font size="3"><font color="#0000ff"><font face="arial"><span class="470202204-12032001">iron fe is the 26th element with an approximate atomic mass number of 56. but, it isthe intrinsic third octave (24) of the periods of elements. in quantum data terms it has the closest neuclei and can structure in body centered or face centered crystalline forms. in the sequential perspective it is seen as the gravity center of the elements.</span></font></font></font></font>
><font face="tahoma" size="2"><font size="3"><font color="#0000ff"><font face="arial"><span class="470202204-12032001"></span></font></font></font></font>
><font face="tahoma" size="2"><font size="3"><font color="#0000ff"><font face="arial"><span class="470202204-12032001">i suspect that you see in your mind the unique role of iron and will continue to enjoy understanding its element possibilities. </span></font></font></font></font>
><font face="tahoma" size="2"><font size="3"><font color="#0000ff"><font face="arial"><span class="470202204-12032001"></span></font></font></font></font>
><font face="tahoma" size="2"><font size="3"><font color="#0000ff"><font face="arial"><span class="470202204-12032001">good luck in your search</span></font></font></font></font>
><font face="tahoma" size="2"><font size="3"><font color="#0000ff"><font face="arial"><span class="470202204-12032001"></span></font></font></font></font>
><font face="tahoma" size="2"><font size="3"><font color="#0000ff"><font face="arial"><span class="470202204-12032001">rod</span></font></font></font></font>
><font face="tahoma" size="2"><font size="3"><font color="#0000ff"><font face="arial"><span class="470202204-12032001"></span></font></font></font></font>
><font face="tahoma" size="2"><font size="3"><font color="#0000ff"><font face="arial"><span class="470202204-12032001"></span></font></font></font>-----original message-----
from: john markey [mailto:jnmarkey@mail.icongrp.com]
sent: sunday, march 11, 2001 3:25 pm
to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com
subject: re: [asc2k] more about octaves</font>
<blockquote>
<blockquote style="border-left: #000000 2px solid; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 0px">
style="font: 10pt arial">----- original message -----
style="background: #e4e4e4; font: 10pt arial; font-color: black">from: cathy gibson (cgibson@sympatico.ca)
style="font: 10pt arial">to: asc2k (asc2k@yahoogroups.com)
style="font: 10pt arial">sent: saturday, march 10, 2001 11:19 am
style="font: 10pt arial">subject: [asc2k] more about octaves
>

>cathy wrote:
>"... he refers to it as a shock, or the absense of a shock...its very hard to interpret this understanding with the few books that i have, however, i want to address this idea of a "shock".he asserts that hydrogen passing through "forces" (sequential phases?)<span class="470202204-12032001"><font color="#0000ff" face="arial"> </font></span>becomes either carbon, oxygen or nitrogen. "
>
><font face="arial" size="2"></font>
><font face="arial" size="2">cathy, this passage formerefers to fusion, which takes place in the stars. hydrogen fuses and its subsequent daughter elements continue up o iron 56 [i believe].</font>
><font face="arial" size="2"></font>
><font face="arial" size="2">john</font>
><font face="arial" size="2"></font>
></blockquote>

<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>

<tt>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service (http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/).</tt>
</blockquote>