David's SciFi TV Appearance 11/08/09 9 pm

[Starfire]

does anyone know of a link with info on david's upcoming tv appearance? my recollection is that it is november 8th sci-fi channel? i would like to share this info with friends who are not visitors of dvine cosmos and would like to provide the details of the show. any info would be great.

starfire

[Enivid]

check out sci-fi's webpage: http://www.syfy.com/2012/index.php

:)

[Tammy D in CT]

2012: startling new secrets, 9pm and repeated again at 11 pm eastern time, november 8th. http://www.syfy.com/2012/index.php

hopefully they will focus on the positive. i listened to a recent dolores cannon show on coast to coast and she was recently interviewed for a similar show, but they left out the positive message she wanted to convey!!!

[Berry Chastain]

it is on the syfy channel on sunday nov. 8 at 8:00 cst. link to schedule here:
http://www.syfy.com/schedule/index.php?date=8-nov-2009&feed_req=

it is titled 2012: startling new secrets and is a two hour program.


does anyone know of a link with info on david's upcoming tv appearance? my recollection is that it is november 8th sci-fi channel? i would like to share this info with friends who are not visitors of dvine cosmos and would like to provide the details of the show. any info would be great.

starfire

[renegadeloser]

it would seem, from reading the description on the syfy page, that they will mostly focus on global catastrophe. but who knows, terror sells, that could just be the hook they're putting in the add, and they will actually convey wilcock's positive message.

[Starfire]

thanks all, i now found it, i never watch the scyfy (didnt even know how to spell it sci-fi? ) channel and didn't know where to look.
i am really hoping they let david have his say without too much editing. it looks like the show is coming from a doom and gloom point of view, david will be the balance to that.

starfire

[Bill]

it just occurred to me after reading the last few posts... this is being shown on the scy-fy (recently change acronym to be sexier than the previous sci-fi) channel... this channel is known for showing science fiction shows, those that might be interpreted as 'being out there' on the fringe... so, hopefully whatever is shown is not treated as a science fiction adventure...

[Simion32]

i'm sure that, as with most things on tv, they will try to strong-arm as much doom prophesy into the documentary as possible.

i wonder why david isn't listed on the syfy site... perhaps it is because he will be talking along with richard hoagland?

the site mentions "life in space, torsion fields, and hyperdimensional physics" as hoagland's theories, perhaps this is where david will get his airtime. if i recall correctly, david mentioned him in one of his announcements for the documentary, so that's very likely.

at a glance the site gives no indication that david wilcock is even in the documentary to begin with, but i'm sure it will be okay.;)

[Jetamus]

how do i watch it?
i don't live in the us or have pay tv.

torrent maybe?

[Berry Chastain]

i cannot assure you, but i have a suspicion that david will try to make the whole video available on this site soon after airing on tv. he know that not all of his "fans" will be able to watch it as it airs on syfy tv.

i say that and then, consider that there may be a contract restriction which keeps him from doing that. i hope not.
berry

[fschulze]

most shows from scyfy are available from eztv.

[Starfire]

i found if you do a search for 2012 on the syfy website it lists multiple days this will be shown:
11/8 9:00 and 11:00
11/12 9:00
11/14 11:00
11/16 4:00
12/21 3:00
all times eastern

how very synchronistic the timing of this show just before the "big movie" release on 11/13.

starfire

[evolving]

i've never owned a tv... always thought they were a useless waste of time, and always found something/anything better to do with my time.

that being said, i would like to see this program... so i hope it gets on the web somehow.

[cbraley1]

i am pretty certain that it will get posted to youtube shortly after it airs. just keep checking and please post the link here after you find it.
l & l
clay in sc

[Wade Krueger]

i think we should all watch it on tv if possible, and spread the word about the show to others. reason being the more people that watch it, the more the ratings go up, this means the public shows an interest in this type of material, which means sci-fi and/or other networks will want to broadcast this type of material more often! :)

see where im going?

-w. krueger

[HelioHelix]

i am also confused as to why dw isn't listed on the lineup of interviewees, there doesn't seem to be any mention of him. kind of strange since he said he was starring in it, i thought that he would at least be in the lineup.


how do i watch it?
i don't live in the us or have pay tv.

torrent maybe?

i'm sure that would be your best bet, i'm in a similar situation as well. minus the not living in america part.

i'm pretty sure posting links to torrents would be frowned upon here though.

[meganarline]

here's a quote from david's latest blog as to why he isn't listed on the syfy show page.


unfortunately, regarding the sci fi documentary, we were asked to speak fairly late in the production schedule and were not taken to any field locations. in order to earn the title of 'investigator' you have to have been filmed at a field location, and their website only now lists 'investigators', not the full cast of people interviewed.

so at this point, sci fi's website only lists richard hoagland, robert schoch and john major jenkins, although the documentary does contain many others as well, including george noory and myself. nonetheless, here's the link... and the producers have assured us we will be very happy with the coverage of our material:


i can't wait to see it although will have to wait for you tube as i don't get the channel.

[divine_zigge]

from david's last divine cosmos blog update.


unfortunately, regarding the sci fi documentary, we were asked to speak fairly late in the production schedule and were not taken to any field locations. in order to earn the title of 'investigator' you have to have been filmed at a field location, and their website only now lists 'investigators', not the full cast of people interviewed.

source:http://divinecosmos.com/index.php/start-here/latest-news/514-brief-update-london-follow-up-and-nassim-haramein

[GeoLaureate]

syfy synopsis:

"massive earthquakes. giant tidal waves. super volcanoes exploding. raging firestorms. these are just a few visions of a global apocalypse that some say will happen on december 21, 2012. that's when the eerily accurate mayan calendar will come to a sudden end. that ancient calendar is causing a modern day panic. people around the world fear that our planet faces a catastrophe never seen before in human history.

what can we do to prepare for 2012-and what has already been done? new theories are emerging that the u.s. and other governments may have conspired to hide the disturbing facts from the public, in part to prevent global panic. some are claiming the u.s. government actually has a secret project to try and prevent an apocalypse. a few aren't waiting for the government to solve the problem. they take these dire predictions so seriously they're preparing for the worst ... selling their homes and moving to undisclosed locations across the globe.

but there is dispute about what that mysterious mayan date really means. some say it's not a new armageddon, but the dawn of a new age.

so, what is the truth behind 2012?

join host lester holt as he explores whether the ancient mayans predicted a possible cataclysm in 2012-and if they could be right. the key to understanding 2012, and possibly surviving it, could be hidden halfway around the world beneath the desert sands. we will travel to egypt with a mission to discover an ancient hall of records believed buried near the pyramids that could reveal secret knowledge about past cataclysms and clues about how we might be able to avert future ones. we'll also travel to central america on a mission to discover the origins of the 2012 prophesy and to find out what it's authors really intended. we will use clues from ancient knowledge combined with modern-day science to uncover the mysteries 2012. it is a race against the clock and mankind's very existence could hang in the balance.

is this a prophecy a death sentence...or perhaps merely a warning? is there be time to save ourselves? join us as we attempt to find out the truth behind 2012."


is it just me, or is this completely bs? i thought the mayans predicted a new age, not a cataclysm. they constantly kept saying the mayans predicted cataclysm. also, that whole synopsis was focused entirely on catastrophe, and had one sentence about the new age.


.

[Chris Hamilton]

but there is dispute about what that mysterious mayan date really means. some say it's not a new armageddon, but the dawn of a new age.

so, what is the truth behind 2012?

what i think geo is that tv sensationalizes to get people to watch. scare us a little...people love to be scared ;). i am sure the program will turn the volume up on scared. david will probably be quoted for his theories and played down for his positive viewpoints. after all, scared is much more fun, lol. scyfy loves scared. chris

[jax]

david also got a thumbs up in messages from matthew newsletter this week! just google it or email me. :)

[Tenet Nosce]

end of the first hour. . . i like the show but can't say i've heard anything that i would classify as "new" or "startling". maybe i am expecting too much? still it is a major leap forward in the sense that i don't see the skeptic viewpoint getting too much play...

[11wanderer11]

they only showed david saying two sentences that i can recall. that's a bummer:(

[Wade Krueger]

just finished watching the entire show and i have to say, great step forward in informing the public, though david didn't get much screen time as i had expected, still a good show and good input by david during his parts. :)

[Simion32]

just as i expected... david got very little airtime. maybe a minute at most.

i feel slightly disappointed - but then, it's to be expected with the doom-and-gloom-ers.

i will have a very tough time explaining to my father exactly why this will be the dawn of the new age... :p

here's hoping david gets the new 2012 enigma video up soon.

[jax]

wow! i watched the whole 2012 program on syfy tonight and recorded it on a vhs tape. i think it was excellent in presentation and clearly explained the various outlooks about 2012 in a coherent way that even i could fathom. [i would have liked to see more of david, however.] now i can positively say i feel confident i can even explain it to others if necessary.

i clearly recall how way back in 1977 i began reading [channeller] book[s] where she gave many warnings about a "shift" coming in the near future. .... definitely meant a polar shift and major cataclysms. frankly, this info scared me "spitless" at the time, but over the years i've developed a thicker skin culminating in my current positive outlook for the fate of our earth. this stems from my devout faith that in spite of the apparent darkness on this earth, humankind is certainly salvageable. the creator knows what our souls are striving for and will send help of all kinds from archangels to ets to this little blue planet in the outback of the galaxy to help us remember who we are and why we are here. time is short. get ready for whatever happens. i choose love not fear. :)

btw let's all write vehement emails to dr. hawass and demand that the egyptian government open the labyrinth [the hall of records edgar cyce and others spoke of] site for immediate excavation! they need to get their heads out of the sand! excuse the pun.

david, i'm so proud of you. keep up the the good work of informing us of what is transpiring. sending love and light to you all. :d

[HelioHelix]

just finished watching the show on a live stream, there is suprisingly a lot of important information being shared, specifically hoagland's tetrahedron theory. i really appreciate that they didn't paint him as a lunatic for his theories about mars and all the other planets.

too bad dw didn't get to add much to the positive side of the conversation. their editing on his appearances was very poor as well. lots of early cuts. there were several times where points about human evolution, hoagland's tetrahedron theory and positivity were mentioned where dw could've had an impacting 2 cents.

[PriestOfLight]

alot of positive things on here, though i was disappointed that david did not get the air time i thought he needed to get a positive message out. hogland was the most interesting with his experiment. i wish i could experment around with all these technologies.

i thought the pole shift theory was debunked or we skipped that time line. yes, no?

love, light, and wisdom

paul

[eagleye]

for those of you who have not watched the show i will save you the emotional trouble and warn you not to watch it if you are choosing to focus on a positive future. it has no positive message whatsoever and focuses almost entirely in doom and gloom. it was the biggest waste of time that i have been involved in for quite some time. as far as i can see the show is a 100% contradiction to david’s message and mine as well.

normally i would have changed the channel after the first two minuets. unfortunately i was fooled into watching the entire show because the producers told david that he would be pleased with the results. after watching the show i am sure that he is not pleased with the results.

initially i thought they were building a foundation to show what most people have been taught about 2012 and that they would then switch to a positive message. in contrast they promoted a negative message throughout the entire duration of the show. as time went on it became evident that what they were doing was spewing out the same old garbage only with a new twist. the twist was tricking people like me into watching it.

after revealing that the mayan prophecy actually points to a positive future they then went on to essentially say that this didn’t really matter because we have scientists who say that the world will end in 2012. what kind of reasoning is that? you base a show on a year that the mayan prophecy predicted and then say to ignore the source and instead focus on something else. it really makes no sense at all. the only reason i can see that someone would make a show like this is because they realize that the word is getting out about true message of the mayans, which is very positive, and are attempting to take our focus away from that.

i will admit that they have succeeded in getting me to willfully subject myself to three hours of fear propaganda. these negative perspectives are perpetuated by those who strive to create a low vibration in the population. by doing this they hope to create a reality of death and destruction since it is the mass consciousness of the planet which creates this reality. don’t let them lead you into a negative timeline because they do exist. we are not forced to walk into them. instead we make a choice to go in that direction by the emotional focusing of our thoughts.

although they may be able to occasionally succeed in these psychic attacks on the light workers they will never be able to convince us to create any of these negative realties if we are aware of what they are doing. it only serves as a temporary slap in the face with no real damage. we simply regroup mentally and then move on in the same direction we were on. :)

[Berry Chastain]

eagleye,
i agree with you completely. i was quite disappointed in the program, especial since david only had five brief shots totaling less than a minute and what they put in was selected quotes that were tending toward the negative when out of context. sad!! i was particularly disappointed in hoagland who i have honored greatly in the past but who was one of the most negatively oriented individuals in this show. again sad!

the whole purpose for this program was to promote the new 2012 movie coming out this friday. they even sponsored the program if you notice. i did force myself to watch the whole thing hoping that in the end david would have an opportunity to speak a positive aspect of 2012, which is what i was under the impression would happen. it didn't. so i went to bed on a somewhat sour note, but maintained my optimistic positive anticipation for the next few years. their fearmongering didn't dent my faith.

[Bill]

just a reminder... this is the 'sci fi' channel... so perhaps they were living up to their name???:d

[eagleye]

berry,

in regards to richard hoagland i would like to say that i have listened to him unedited many times and can say that mostly he really does convey a much more positive message than the way he was portrayed on the show. although he does not agree with david and us on a lot of things he still believes that a positive outcome is possible. he believes that a disclosure is imminent which will facilitate the release of hidden technology. he believes that the development of this technology will allow us to avert disaster in 2012. he seems to believe in the power of giving information to humanity and that if the truth is revealed that humans would be able to fix many of the problems we have. he always tries to expose what he believes to be lies and i will give him credit for that. it is no surprise we did not hear any of this in the show since they have betrayed almost all of the shows participants. even the quotes from david were made out to appear negative. they showed him saying that the frequency is changing but did not allow him to explain any of that. in other words they were saying that the frequency is changing so the whole world is going to blow up! that is what i call taking a quote out of context, which amounts to just plain lying.

i also believe that richard hoagland had a lot more to say about the positive aspects of torsion field energy but that it was edited out to make him appear to have a purely negative message in support of the new movie coming out. i suspect that he will not be totally pleased with the final product of the show either because they did not really focus on the fact that his science is proven. it seemed to me that his goal for the show was to prove the existence of torsion field energy which he did but that proof was neutralized by the editing. instead they twisted the truth and made it seem like no one really knows if it is true. that is a lie. let them tell that to the visitors flying around our skies using torsion fields. and tell that to the government that uses this technology to built ships. there is a lot more supporting evidence for the existence of torsion field energy waves than the device richard hoagland used on the show. i would like to add that i was very excited to see his invention and that it was just another layer of evidence to prove scientifically that it is not only real but that many of the ancient civilizations knew about it and built structures to harness it. that device was probably the only positive aspect of the whole show.

anyway everything has its place and to me richard hoagland is doing a lot to expose the lies and reveal the truth about the hidden space program and the extraterrestrial presence. i never really expected him to be totally positive because he is mostly analytical with very little spiritual message. he is the type of person that will not really believe anything unless he tests it scientifically. he relies totally on physical matter to shape his beliefs and might not realize this is an illusion. unfortunately for him many things can only be understood by going within ourselves and allowing our consciousness to expand. many people are not ready for that yet. but things can happen quickly to change them. we don’t really know who will make it that far in this cycle. i always hope that they will but it is not for me to tell them what to think. overall i still think richard hoagland is doing good work for humanity and will continue to check his latest work. he has a lot of good information that supports a positive perspective. i simply utilize the information that i think i can use from the work he does and ignore the rest. ;)

[NegaNova]

oh well, things aren't too too bad! we have to remain positive, we're all in this together! all things happen in the most perfect way, and perhaps this event is necessary for future endeavours. in fact, david even said that this let down made him want to work even harder on horizon, and maybe that's what we all need. if we persevere, i know awesome things will turn out! love is here, and beautiful things are happening all around us! thanks david for all the awesome **** you've done for us haha, and everyone else for keeping these forums alive! we're alll together! :d wooo!

500 puppiess!!!!

:)

[evolving]

eagleye,
i agree with you completely. i was quite disappointed in the program, especial since david only had five brief shots totaling less than a minute and what they put in was selected quotes that were tending toward the negative when out of context. sad!! i was particularly disappointed in hoagland who i have honored greatly in the past but who was one of the most negatively oriented individuals in this show. again sad!
remember that hoagland's ideas and conversations were also probably twisted just as david's were.


the whole purpose for this program was to promote the new 2012 movie coming out this friday. they even sponsored the program if you notice. i did force myself to watch the whole thing hoping that in the end david would have an opportunity to speak a positive aspect of 2012, which is what i was under the impression would happen. it didn't. so i went to bed on a somewhat sour note, but maintained my optimistic positive anticipation for the next few years. their fear mongering didn't dent my faith.
there you have it. this was a promotion for the 2012 movie, and thus had both money and insight from hollywood, thus those of the negative elite. they are grasping to increase their negative polarity right now in any way possible, and this is just one of those ways.

personally, i don't have a tv, though had hoped to see program because of the possible "positive twist" not being portrayed by the media. however, from what you all say here, i can skip it as a waste of time and thank the one creator that i don't have a tv!

let's give it the thumb down sign, and offer those that made it, as well as the money behind it (the negative elite) all the love in our hearts :d

[Viracocha]

hope we australians get to see the show at some point, love to see it :)

[transiten]

01.am

as i wrote on davids blog the brighter his light shines the stronger the resistance from the dark forces as he also has stated himslef. a candle can illuminate a dark room but the vast darkness can never turn out that same candlelight.

transiten 01.01am gothenburg sweden

[Jetamus]

from davids description it sounds like those y2k "documentaries" i used to see in the late 1990s that scared the **** out of me.
no way am i watching any more of that stuff.

david will have his day though.

[Meriut]

i have to say it was good to see david on the show but disappointing that they chopped what he had to say and made it look as though he was saying something else, but then that's the way the media spins things these days. clearly it was a big promotion for the 2012 movie of fear & doom. you wasted a good opportunity with some really exceptional people, syfy. :mad:

unfortunately all the information about interplanetary changes was completely gone.

not too surprised though since syfy is owned by nbc who in turn is owned by ge - one of the biggest war profiteer corporations.

i did happen upon this link the other day and found it amazing that it states the same thing that david has been saying about the changes in our solar system.the article even mentions edgar cayce!

"russian scientists further warn that the west’s “obsession” with manmade global warming is a deliberately designed propaganda effort to shield their peoples from the fact that not only our earth, but all of the planets in our solar system are currently undergoing rapid warming, and as proved, beyond all doubt, by doctor scientist habibullo abdussamatov,head of space research at st. petersburg's pulkovo astronomical observatory in russia..."

more at link (if this is ok with mods) http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/7331/53/


i still feel this was really a good step for david and that he was seen with hoagland, braden and the others who were a part, even if they did spin it differently from what was done and intended in the interviews. good for david!!!:d i'm excited he is doing his own 2012 video and can't wait!!!

[aqcheryl]

i made it a point to monitor the tv to catch this show - which is no small feat lol

i too, was disappointed in the show.

let me preface this by saying that the universe grants us gifts in unexpected ways, and everything happens for a reason. so i rejoice in the gift that david even made it on the show for the amount of time he did!

on the other hand - the show, granted it is the first i personally have seen that remotely even suggests a positive outlook for 2012 - well i felt they were making a mockery of that positive outlook. i also was not happy that every time david spoke, they prefaced it with the doomsday scenario. he really was presented as a doomsdayer.

however, lets see how this can work to our advantage. the major thing here is they really flashed the site address on the show. not that i was paying too much attention to everyone else as i did david - i dont recall seeing a website listed for them?

but no, there, was divinecosmos.com. also, he may have been presented as pointing out doom and gloom, but you know if you think about it - the masses out there that have even heard of 2012 - immediately hear of the doom and gloom.

and for the human propensity of getting an adrenaline rush from fear - they are not going to come to dc if they knew it was going to take away this pleasurable feeling. however lets say they come to dc because they think they can learn more about doom and gloom from dc - but now that they arrive, they can start reading the important stuff.

so it might actually impact more people, that he was presented as a doomsdayer as opposed to a positive outlook.

and you know i still cant stop laughing at richard getting excited and saying 'this is too cool for school'. sorry, im a youngin' here... that is not my generation, or even near my generation, to hear that. so its funny for me. lol but i really loved his excitement - i only wish they would have stopped saying 'this theory is too difficult to explain or understand'. the time they covered saying that, they could have explained the theory.

its not that hard, in laymans terms.

so yes - some things were disappointing for me - but overall i walk away with a positive outlook about it. it happened the way it did, because its all part of a grander universal plan.

[evolving]

from david's blog

a few letters have come in that were intentionally or unintentionally quite nasty. look... i'm sharing my honest feelings with you. i was told i would have great coverage in this special. this was not the case. some would call that a lie. others say "that's television." since "betrayal is the first rule of the order," i'm frankly not surprised at all.


i wrote down, in real time, how i was feeling. i was very let down by how it turned out. you deserve to hear what i'm really feeling rather than a politically-correct, sanitized version where i come off as totally confident.


it is not 'ego' for me to share how i'm feeling. this is a live blog -- going through what i experienced as i watched something i had been looking forward to, and hoping for the best, for literally six months. it was a major letdown. something happened along the way in the editing room, and i have been left with egg on my face for representing how i was told it would come out, only to see a very, very different result.


david,

reading your blog, i could feel your excitement to start, waning away slowly as the time went by. i felt your pain when the special ended, and i had expected it so.

if i may be of service, i will offer you a small piece of advice. unless you or someone you trust is in charge of editing, do not expect much. if it is run by any main stream media, expect the worst. you were correct in stating that you were careful to not say anything which could be taken the wrong way, and considering they could use only a few lines, i would suggest that you gave them very little in that way. well done!

we know your intentions were pure, and we that understand you speak the truth, support you. as for the rest, who sent you nasty letters, we can only have compassion for them in their suffering. although there may have been much dark in that special, there was also one candle. i salute you as being that candle.

[aqcheryl]

from david's blog


david,

reading your blog, i could feel your excitement to start, waning away slowly as the time went by. i felt your pain when the special ended, and i had expected it so.

if i may be of service, i will offer you a small piece of advice. unless you or someone you trust is in charge of editing, do not expect much. if it is run by any main stream media, expect the worst. you were correct in stating that you were careful to not say anything which could be taken the wrong way, and considering they could use only a few lines, i would suggest that you gave them very little in that way. well done!

we know your intentions were pure, and we that understand you speak the truth, support you. as for the rest, who sent you nasty letters, we can only have compassion for them in their suffering. although there may have been much dark in that special, there was also one candle. i salute you as being that candle.

i have to agree with you here evolving, in everything you said.

but for the part you quoted from david's blog, i have to disagree with david. lol
in it, he said that to share his feelings raw and unedited is not the ego. i disagree, for in fact - it is the ego from which our feelings stem.

however on that note, i think david more meant ego as in arrogance - rather than ego itself. but since we discuss the ego separately from its generic meaning in society (which is indeed equated with arrogance), it should perhaps be clarified or just stated as such [arrogance].

to have our ego is not a bad thing. it allows us to feel, and to have the emotion we do have. if you did not feel anger, fear, upset, or love, joy, happiness - you would be separated from the ego. and all of those emotions are positive when there is a healthy balance. they provide a learning structure we simply could not achieve without the ego.

david sharing what he feels, i appreciate. as he goes through his spiritual journey, watching him continue to grow - and yes he does have a long way to go as do the rest of us - it helps me grow, as im sure it helps others grow as well.

so if i could tell david anything my message would be simply 'those who mind, dont matter; and those who matter, dont mind'. release the disappointment their editing caused, and accept the positivity that can be had for the moment, for what it was. just as it drew people to your site and perhaps with negative responses - the positive here is they still looked. they have become exposed to the message. and who knows, in the future they may release their own arrogance and remember and come back. everyone's journey only happens when they are ready - and everything happens for a reason. celebrate the milestone, and keep going. you are doing the right thing. :)

[tanam]

see the whole syfyshow here folks:

http://blip.tv/file/2851843

obviously they edited a lot of the good vibes and instead put the hype of the fearful, doomy gloomy future. i think this draws parallel to the law of one quote "the priests and the peoples of that era quickly distorted our message, robbing it of the compassion with which unity is informed". o well, there's nothing new under the heaven as the preacher used to say :-)

for us love-mongering folks, i'm quoting ra/david's reading may 29, 2002, as i believe it is becoming more and more relevant for this moment of history:

"again we are here to tell you that there will unexpected surprises that will overturn many of the more egregious scenarios now being bandied about by your mainstream media, and that point cannot be overstressed. there are lines of distinction that can be crossed here, and it is related to the overall function of consciousness in humanity. therefore, the best way that you can help is to try to be as consistent as you can in maintaining an atmosphere of love, joy, and peace in your daily affairs. this in turn strengthens the collective human energy field, and negotiates a greater flexibility of change for us to work with in our protective endeavors.


a certain degree of discernment is therefore very wise in what and how much is to be read, if you wish to maintain the highest state of balance and spiritual integrity. without such a discipline, the negative views can literally be overwhelming, as an energy transfer of sorts occurs between the writer and the recipient. we have spoken before of how humanity will, to a greater and greater degree, become infected, as it were, with the disease of fear. this is indeed a very tangible spiritual condition that is not easily rectified once it has put deep roots into the subconscious mind. the negative elites have obviously fulfilled their biblically-assigned job of ruling over the earth, meaning that the media sources you interact with in that known as the "mainstream" do have propensity for great distortions towards fear, and almost none of the inherent goodness of humanity, in the existence of an ultimate being or higher principle, or in the ability for human faith to create miracles where only desperation had previously existed.

we are asking you to take a step forward into trust, and to volunteer your efforts to be of greater vibrational assistance to the uplift of this planet through preserving internal peace. this is indeed a step of faith, and cannot be easily made in a state of distraction.

the most efficient framework in which you can make this choice is in consulting with your inner silence, rather than in the chatter of the outside world as the death-cries of a dysfunctional system of consciousness become ever more screeching. and the more that you can help out by asking yourself where the love is in any moment, the quicker and easier the transition will be. "

love y'all

[transiten]

goodmorning tanam:)

good point!

one can at least try to remember to ask and not forget to ask also for all those starving children, terrified soldiers, tortured prisoners, mentallly disordered and others living under unthinkable conditions.....

transiten

[bobfitz]

i have no expectation that mainstream media will tell the truth. i doubt they even know how to do it anymore.

here's the story you won't see on mainstream tv or in print:
- humans are an ancient intergalactic race
- our planet has been inhabited by advanced races for millions of years
- we are infinite beings experiencing duality in service to the one
- society, as we now know it, is a carefully constructed illusion
- all governments, learning institutions, corporate structures, and religions are designed to perpetuate this illusion
- to free human life on this planet from the spell of illusion, each of us must focus on own divinity and manifestation of love
- when we do this, we open the door to infinite possibility and can be reunited with other ancient intergalactic races
- we are rapidly approaching a massive transformation in consciousness that will speed this process along (like it or not)
- we will enjoy the transformation more if we manifest from love rather than fear

david will never be "validated" by the mainstream. he validates himself through his thoughts, actions, openness, and heart. i beleive we should all do the same thing. the greatest proof point does not come tv or youtube. it comes from experiencing the transformation within and sharing it from the heart.

[meganarline]

:d i just love that saying - love mongering. never heard that before, thanks tanam. that made my day! thanks for the link too.

i too have been re-reading a bunch of the ra/david readings and would encourage all to do the same.

joined with you all in love mongering.

megan

[Richard Lovell]

looks like the video has been taken off blip.tv already.

interesting...

[tanam]

:d ;) :p :)


moderator sez: i suppose this ideographic comment is in response to the video being unceremoniously pulled thus leaving us with mere icons sans substance. ??

[chillhour101]

i'm fascinated that david and nassim have (finally) met. what a dyanamic pairing. as for the show aired recently. i too was disappointed. what is inspiring? david was invited 'late in the production.' i sense david has humility and recognizes a stepping stone as a stepping stone.

in response to ego. the idea is not to obliterate ego and agree one must balance the polarity of love by harmonizing and exercising discernment.

emotions fuel the subconcious. 'e' motion

e=energy, right?

[eagleye]

hi everyone,

i was very pleased yesterday to come across a new video on youtube of a recent coast to coast show featuring gregg braden and richard hoagland talking together. if you want to know what richard really tried to say on the sci-fi show, before the producers twisted it, listen to this show. he talks about many things that were left out of the show, which he tried to convey, but were edited out. and he also explains very clearly that what you saw on that show was not the truth.

in addition i would like to reverse what i said in a previous post on this thread that richard hoagland does not focus at all on spirituality and is purely analytical. after listening to this radio show i realize that i misunderstood his message and that he does believe in the spiritual. in fact he can prove that it exits with his scientific work. it focuses on torsion field energy which he is aware is based on consciousness. on the show he explained it is the conscious energy that ties us all together, the ether. i was surprised at his perspective since you could say it is actually based in the spiritual.

i was also absolutely fascinated by the positive energy coming from both of them as they eloquently harmonized almost perfectly together, like there was one person talking, but there were two. they almost never interrupted each other. instead one would stop talking, and the other would pick up where they left off, synchronizing their words with the previous thought made by the other person. it is very rare to see two people talking like this without disagreeing or arguing. it was also amazing to see how the work of two different kinds of scientists brought them to exactly the same conclusions and how the work of one perfectly complimented the other, without comparing notes on the work they were doing as they were doing it. check it out!

there are fifteen parts to this series. enjoy:

note from moderator... forum rules call for a maximum of two links per posting... the last 13 can be accessed serially one after another.

video 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfy3a2zz4gi&feature=related

video 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ner1vnt3fg&feature=related

video 3 -- 15

this example teaches me not to come to hasty conclusions about any seeming negative events. it is the sci-fi show that was the trigger for bringing richard hoagland and gregg braden together for this show. in fact they have not come together like this since 1992. we are now seeing all kinds of positive aftershocks as a result of this show, even though it seemed negative to begin with. :)

[Berry Chastain]

hello eagleye and everyone.
i have been watching this fantastic interview on coast to coast with richard hoagland and gregg braden. tremendous information.

what i am noting here is that on the eighth section of the video, it is suddenly stopped at the point, 8:35 where richard is talking about the assasination of jack kennedy and the photo of a ufo has been discovered. he begins to explain his theory that the governments retroengeneered ufo was actually responsible for the killing because of kennedy's intention to disclose the ufo/et phenomonon.
google has blocked that portion of the video from that point. can't get the rest of the discussion or the final part of part 8.

[eagleye]

berry chastain,

thank you for mentioning that point. i totally forgot about that. i noticed when it happened but the rest of the conversation was so fascinating that i did not remember that i was disappointed about not being able to hear the rest of his explanation on that.

if anyone comes across another posting of this video somewhere else with the missing part please post the link. i will see if i can find it myself.

[eagleye]

ok, i have found the same data on another series of the same show on youtube. here is the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyanjjqesbo

richard starts discussing the kennedy information at about two minuets in. after comparing the two videos i don’t think anything was cut off or lost. the only reason it seemed that way is because part eight ended there.

[transiten]

amazing amazing!

also they support davids theory of global warming throughout the entire solarsystem that is so heavily discussed in the "global warming thread" . part 3 2.40 min into the show greg braden clearly says this is the case and seconds it with scientific proof and next part 7. 7.35 min.

and i just love greg bradens emphasis of the heart over the brain, wonderful man, at least here in 3d;)

transiten

[lvxseeker]

this is probably old news, but i found 2012 startling new secrets on youtube the other day

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=te5h3yf5why