PDA

View Full Version : The numbers of the Harvest



Fa Fa Fooey
02-07-2001, 01:19 PM
i am finding myself in an interesting position today. i have followed
david's work and others of a similiar nature. i read a post of
david's on this group recently that implied the "harvest" is really
not going to be a wide-scale planetary ascension, but just for the
lucky few who can be "gotten to". i find this a troubling vision, and
perhaps even lacking in deep compassion. really the reason is simple,
i see most people yearning for love and truth, but not knowing where
to find it. since its fair to say most people do not have access to
the internet, and most people do not know of great teachers of
meditation such as osho, krishnamurti, buddha, etc. then it would
appear that no matter how the massess might desire within to be
spiritually awake, there is little they can do in their current
situations.

the bottom line is, if one does not understand the nature
of the mind, then one is perpetually trapped in one's ego construct,
no? and in that case, self-centeredness is almost a given, sort of
impossible to not be, if the disease ultimately is identification
with thought. with that point, i suggest that in my vision, and i
assume it's okay for me to state this. in my vision, all will be
flooded with the energies of love, and a spontaneous enlightenment, a
critical mass being reached, all will "waken" and we will
collectively shift from fear based existence in duality to love based
existence in oneness. why do we have to continue with the negative
concepts associated with only a "few" ascending. this seems to lack a
fundamental awareness of the problem, which ultimately is the mind.

this seemingly lack of wisdom in david's work prompts me to
suggest why perhaps david has taken this path. i do not suggest it is
all negative, but i do believe in the power of love as a
transformative force which can reveal the truth within. i
noticed david has been saying lately in updates and posts that he is
going to meditate and focus exclusively on his "soul work" to me it
would seem that before david completed, and even published his work
on the "harvest" it would have done him well to have meditated
intensively before he beagn the work. for a man in his ego, no matter
how open to "et transmissions" and "psychic abilities" would first
want to reach an enlightened state of consciousness as we have seen
in buddha, osho, krishnamurti, jesus, etc.

to do the work first, there is a fundamental problem, no matter
how "scientific" its basis. david is still generally in the ego. this
is the problem. i have absorbed all his information and found it
quite compelling, but i think that i will wait until david has truly
undergone a shift in consciousness before i continue to give any
credence to his predictions of "how many" will make it. until that
time, i will continue to focus exclusively on meditation myself. i
will no longer discuss any 2012, harvest, critical mass,
consciousness, fifth dimension, etc. for until i am centered in self,
these are just words, no more valid or less than the next ego in
speculation. to even predict to me seems to be denying the
fundamental law of the universe that every moment is new!

if david is trying to scare people in meditating, that too seem to
not be the way of light. i cannot say more since my ego is now
unwinding to such an extreme i think it's best to remain silent. i
hope david continues to go deeper within. i hope david would look
into kundalini meditation, which would facilitate the opening of all
his energy centers up to the crown chakra, so that david will be
merged with the divine. when that union has taken place, i would be
most interested in how the nature of david's work will change, if he
would continue with the work at all! i'm not sure at that point any
of us will care.

perhaps nothing needs be done but deepen the silence which increases
the prescence of the one! that to me would be the greatest service to
humanity, and would see to allow for an increase in "harvest" for as
i change, so does the universe. each additional enlightened being
changes the game dramatically. i think there is a high possibility
that before 2012, there will be millions of enlightened beings on the
planet. when this is manifest, the power of the prescence and force
of love will transmute any ideas that can be seen as negative
including a "small harvest" all you need is love.

let's transform ourselves, lets leave words for a later time, for now
it is just the mind speculating, and this seems to be a rather futile
exercise, even as developed a theory as david's, it's still mind-
stuff. words no matter how intricate, cannot capture this moment.
what may or may not happen in 2012 is primarily dependent on our
state of consciousness. david seems to imply most people are
not "fit" i suggest they havent had much choice due to the subtle
nature of the mind and religions lack of explaining it, never mind
all other resources. not intending to attack david as much as point
out that what he is saying now may not hold true in the future, as he
gets deeper within himself! this to me should be kept in mind, like
anything else, even davids work cannot be seen as a fixed entity, but
rather a flowing journey through his own awareness, and the end
result being he meditates and wakes up, then that was reason enough.
but to focus on the details, is not necessarily that wise. we should
all wake up first and then discuss. for how can one trust ones
judgement when one is still in the dualistic mode of consciousness?

time to turn off the internet and go within!

peace.

jason

Fa Fa Fooey
02-07-2001, 01:26 PM
sorry if i posted twice...thought the first one didnt go thru.

Jeremy Weiland
02-07-2001, 01:46 PM
<table bgcolor="#ffffff">
><font face="arial" size="2"> all i can say, jason, is that you have every right to express the truth that you find within yourself. however, is it necessary to attack david because he has expressed that truth within him? nobody is saying that you have to agree with david's work, but to cast asperations at him because you think he is "in the ego"... pull the splinterout ofyour own eye first, my friend.</font>
><font face="arial" size="2"> in case your are interested in understanding david's work, i will try to address your points in the hope that david won't (please i hope that you do not respond to this email from jason, david, as this is exactly the type of situation that you're supposed to be avoiding!!!! you have stated your position - leave the arguing to us). david does not say that you have to be "enlightened" to a certain degree to ascend. the ra material and david both agree that you must be *polarized* at least 51% service to others to ascend to 4d&#43; and at least 95% service to self to ascend 4d-. now this is very very different than being enlightened, or having conscious understanding of metaphysics and spirituality. it is a measure of your innerdevelopment and the lessons you have learned in your experiences in 3d. obviously, if you are living consciously, it's much easier to polarize, but the vast majority of the planet is polarizing without conscious knowledge of the loo or spiritual teachings in general. david and related scholars are basically saying that ascension occurs when you're ready, and that if you don't ascend, it's not the end of the world (figuratively, of course :-) since you will simply repeat the cycle and learn the lessons you need to. to not ascend does not mean you are a bad person, it just means you haven't yet learned everything you came here to learn. </font>
><font face="arial" size="2"> we're all still dealing with the experience of ego; it is not a liability, it's an asset, a tool. if things that david says don't resonate with you, forget about it - it won't hurt you. but if you are going to discuss them, you could at least initiate discussion rather than attack.</font>
><font face="arial" size="2"> you are not obligated in the least to take part in anything you view as "idle speculation". but if you want to challenge it, challenge it with facts and principle rather than casting asperations about someone being "in their ego." </font>
><font face="arial" size="2"> i hope you can see where i'm coming from and that in the future you can partcipate in a more productive manner.</font>
><font face="arial" size="2"> l/l</font>
><font face="arial" size="2"> jeremy</font>
<blockquote style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left: #000000 2px solid; margin-right: 0px">
style="font: 10pt arial">----- original message -----
style="background: #e4e4e4; font: 10pt arial; font-color: black">from: fa fa fooey (sirbiotech@yahoo.com)
style="font: 10pt arial">to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com
style="font: 10pt arial">sent: wednesday, february 07, 2001 4:19 pm
style="font: 10pt arial">subject: [asc2k] the numbers of the harvest
>
<tt>i am finding myself in an interesting position today. i have followed
david's work and others of a similiar nature. i read a post of
david's on this group recently that implied the "harvest" is really
not going to be a wide-scale planetary ascension, but just for the
lucky few who can be "gotten to". i find this a troubling vision, and
perhaps even lacking in deep compassion. really the reason is simple,
i see most people yearning for love and truth, but not knowing where
to find it. since its fair to say most people do not have access to
the internet, and most people do not know of great teachers of
meditation such as osho, krishnamurti, buddha, etc. then it would
appear that no matter how the massess might desire within to be
spiritually awake, there is little they can do in their current
situations.

the bottom line is, if one does not understand the nature
of the mind, then one is perpetually trapped in one's ego construct,
no? and in that case, self-centeredness is almost a given, sort of
impossible to not be, if the disease ultimately is identification
with thought. with that point, i suggest that in my vision, and i
assume it's okay for me to state this. in my vision, all will be
flooded with the energies of love, and a spontaneous enlightenment, a
critical mass being reached, all will "waken" and we will
collectively shift from fear based existence in duality to love based
existence in oneness. why do we have to continue with the negative
concepts associated with only a "few" ascending. this seems to lack a
fundamental awareness of the problem, which ultimately is the mind.

this seemingly lack of wisdom in david's work prompts me to
suggest why perhaps david has taken this path. i do not suggest it is
all negative, but i do believe in the power of love as a
transformative force which can reveal the truth within. i
noticed david has been saying lately in updates and posts that he is
going to meditate and focus exclusively on his "soul work" to me it
would seem that before david completed, and even published his work
on the "harvest" it would have done him well to have meditated
intensively before he beagn the work. for a man in his ego, no matter
how open to "et transmissions" and "psychic abilities" would first
want to reach an enlightened state of consciousness as we have seen
in buddha, osho, krishnamurti, jesus, etc.

to do the work first, there is a fundamental problem, no matter
how "scientific" its basis. david is still generally in the ego. this
is the problem. i have absorbed all his information and found it
quite compelling, but i think that i will wait until david has truly
undergone a shift in consciousness before i continue to give any
credence to his predictions of "how many" will make it. until that
time, i will continue to focus exclusively on meditation myself. i
will no longer discuss any 2012, harvest, critical mass,
consciousness, fifth dimension, etc. for until i am centered in self,
these are just words, no more valid or less than the next ego in
speculation. to even predict to me seems to be denying the
fundamental law of the universe that every moment is new!

if david is trying to scare people in meditating, that too seem to
not be the way of light. i cannot say more since my ego is now
unwinding to such an extreme i think it's best to remain silent. i
hope david continues to go deeper within. i hope david would look
into kundalini meditation, which would facilitate the opening of all
his energy centers up to the crown chakra, so that david will be
merged with the divine. when that union has taken place, i would be
most interested in how the nature of david's work will change, if he
would continue with the work at all! i'm not sure at that point any
of us will care.

perhaps nothing needs be done but deepen the silence which increases
the prescence of the one! that to me would be the greatest service to
humanity, and would see to allow for an increase in "harvest" for as
i change, so does the universe. each additional enlightened being
changes the game dramatically. i think there is a high possibility
that before 2012, there will be millions of enlightened beings on the
planet. when this is manifest, the power of the prescence and force
of love will transmute any ideas that can be seen as negative
including a "small harvest" all you need is love.

let's transform ourselves, lets leave words for a later time, for now
it is just the mind speculating, and this seems to be a rather futile
exercise, even as developed a theory as david's, it's still mind-
stuff. words no matter how intricate, cannot capture this moment.
what may or may not happen in 2012 is primarily dependent on our
state of consciousness. david seems to imply most people are
not "fit" i suggest they havent had much choice due to the subtle
nature of the mind and religions lack of explaining it, never mind
all other resources. not intending to attack david as much as point
out that what he is saying now may not hold true in the future, as he
gets deeper within himself! this to me should be kept in mind, like
anything else, even davids work cannot be seen as a fixed entity, but
rather a flowing journey through his own awareness, and the end
result being he meditates and wakes up, then that was reason enough.
but to focus on the details, is not necessarily that wise. we should
all wake up first and then discuss. for how can one trust ones
judgement when one is still in the dualistic mode of consciousness?

time to turn off the internet and go within!

peace.

jason

</tt>

<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>
</blockquote>

Fa Fa Fooey
02-07-2001, 02:48 PM
if you see it as an attack, i would suggest to drop all attatchments
to ego. if anything, i am just expressing a part of david's own mind.
for in reality the boundries are but illusions. what i wrote, i did
not "think" about it. it just came out. i am sorry if you were
offended, just what flows flows. i no longer self-censor, because i
believe the purity of the flow is more important than being "polite"
anyways...silence will now speak for me.


--- in asc2k@y..., "jeremy weiland" <jweiland@n...> wrote:
> all i can say, jason, is that you have every right to express
the truth that you find within yourself. however, is it necessary to
attack david because he has expressed that truth within him? nobody
is saying that you have to agree with david's work, but to cast
asperations at him because you think he is "in the ego"... pull the
splinter out of your own eye first, my friend.
> in case your are interested in understanding david's work, i
will try to address your points in the hope that david won't (please
i hope that you do not respond to this email from jason, david, as
this is exactly the type of situation that you're supposed to be
avoiding!!!! you have stated your position - leave the arguing to
us). david does not say that you have to be "enlightened" to a
certain degree to ascend. the ra material and david both agree that
you must be *polarized* at least 51% service to others to ascend to
4d+ and at least 95% service to self to ascend 4d-. now this is very
very different than being enlightened, or having conscious
understanding of metaphysics and spirituality. it is a measure of
your inner development and the lessons you have learned in your
experiences in 3d. obviously, if you are living consciously, it's
much easier to polarize, but the vast majority of the planet is
polarizing without conscious knowledge of the loo or spiritual
teachings in general. david and related scholars are basically
saying that ascension occurs when you're ready, and that if you don't
ascend, it's not the end of the world (figuratively, of course :-)
since you will simply repeat the cycle and learn the lessons you need
to. to not ascend does not mean you are a bad person, it just means
you haven't yet learned everything you came here to learn.
> we're all still dealing with the experience of ego; it is not a
liability, it's an asset, a tool. if things that david says don't
resonate with you, forget about it - it won't hurt you. but if you
are going to discuss them, you could at least initiate discussion
rather than attack.
> you are not obligated in the least to take part in anything you
view as "idle speculation". but if you want to challenge it,
challenge it with facts and principle rather than casting asperations
about someone being "in their ego."
> i hope you can see where i'm coming from and that in the future
you can partcipate in a more productive manner.
> l/l
> jeremy
> ----- original message -----
> from: fa fa fooey
> to: asc2k@y...
> sent: wednesday, february 07, 2001 4:19 pm
> subject: [asc2k] the numbers of the harvest
>
>
> i am finding myself in an interesting position today. i have
followed
> david's work and others of a similiar nature. i read a post of
> david's on this group recently that implied the "harvest" is
really
> not going to be a wide-scale planetary ascension, but just for
the
> lucky few who can be "gotten to". i find this a troubling vision,
and
> perhaps even lacking in deep compassion. really the reason is
simple,
> i see most people yearning for love and truth, but not knowing
where
> to find it. since its fair to say most people do not have access
to
> the internet, and most people do not know of great teachers of
> meditation such as osho, krishnamurti, buddha, etc. then it would
> appear that no matter how the massess might desire within to be
> spiritually awake, there is little they can do in their current
> situations.
>
> the bottom line is, if one does not understand the nature
> of the mind, then one is perpetually trapped in one's ego
construct,
> no? and in that case, self-centeredness is almost a given, sort
of
> impossible to not be, if the disease ultimately is identification
> with thought. with that point, i suggest that in my vision, and i
> assume it's okay for me to state this. in my vision, all will be
> flooded with the energies of love, and a spontaneous
enlightenment, a
> critical mass being reached, all will "waken" and we will
> collectively shift from fear based existence in duality to love
based
> existence in oneness. why do we have to continue with the
negative
> concepts associated with only a "few" ascending. this seems to
lack a
> fundamental awareness of the problem, which ultimately is the
mind.
>
> this seemingly lack of wisdom in david's work prompts me to
> suggest why perhaps david has taken this path. i do not suggest
it is
> all negative, but i do believe in the power of love as a
> transformative force which can reveal the truth within. i
> noticed david has been saying lately in updates and posts that he
is
> going to meditate and focus exclusively on his "soul work" to me
it
> would seem that before david completed, and even published his
work
> on the "harvest" it would have done him well to have meditated
> intensively before he beagn the work. for a man in his ego, no
matter
> how open to "et transmissions" and "psychic abilities" would
first
> want to reach an enlightened state of consciousness as we have
seen
> in buddha, osho, krishnamurti, jesus, etc.
>
> to do the work first, there is a fundamental problem, no matter
> how "scientific" its basis. david is still generally in the ego.
this
> is the problem. i have absorbed all his information and found it
> quite compelling, but i think that i will wait until david has
truly
> undergone a shift in consciousness before i continue to give any
> credence to his predictions of "how many" will make it. until
that
> time, i will continue to focus exclusively on meditation myself.
i
> will no longer discuss any 2012, harvest, critical mass,
> consciousness, fifth dimension, etc. for until i am centered in
self,
> these are just words, no more valid or less than the next ego in
> speculation. to even predict to me seems to be denying the
> fundamental law of the universe that every moment is new!
>
> if david is trying to scare people in meditating, that too seem
to
> not be the way of light. i cannot say more since my ego is now
> unwinding to such an extreme i think it's best to remain silent.
i
> hope david continues to go deeper within. i hope david would look
> into kundalini meditation, which would facilitate the opening of
all
> his energy centers up to the crown chakra, so that david will be
> merged with the divine. when that union has taken place, i would
be
> most interested in how the nature of david's work will change, if
he
> would continue with the work at all! i'm not sure at that point
any
> of us will care.
>
> perhaps nothing needs be done but deepen the silence which
increases
> the prescence of the one! that to me would be the greatest
service to
> humanity, and would see to allow for an increase in "harvest" for
as
> i change, so does the universe. each additional enlightened being
> changes the game dramatically. i think there is a high
possibility
> that before 2012, there will be millions of enlightened beings on
the
> planet. when this is manifest, the power of the prescence and
force
> of love will transmute any ideas that can be seen as negative
> including a "small harvest" all you need is love.
>
> let's transform ourselves, lets leave words for a later time, for
now
> it is just the mind speculating, and this seems to be a rather
futile
> exercise, even as developed a theory as david's, it's still mind-
> stuff. words no matter how intricate, cannot capture this moment.
> what may or may not happen in 2012 is primarily dependent on our
> state of consciousness. david seems to imply most people are
> not "fit" i suggest they havent had much choice due to the subtle
> nature of the mind and religions lack of explaining it, never
mind
> all other resources. not intending to attack david as much as
point
> out that what he is saying now may not hold true in the future,
as he
> gets deeper within himself! this to me should be kept in mind,
like
> anything else, even davids work cannot be seen as a fixed entity,
but
> rather a flowing journey through his own awareness, and the end
> result being he meditates and wakes up, then that was reason
enough.
> but to focus on the details, is not necessarily that wise. we
should
> all wake up first and then discuss. for how can one trust ones
> judgement when one is still in the dualistic mode of
consciousness?
>
> time to turn off the internet and go within!
>
> peace.
>
> jason
>
>
> yahoo! groups sponsor
>
> www.
>
>
>
>
> to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=mv0t4ieosow1l2qtcdp65gaslk_qkevxqijm93 ftlhtqug4glowricevpo2mfhgtkebfr6y-nma3yvbttwwehkkkra)

David Wilcock
02-07-2001, 03:09 PM
<table bgcolor="#ffffff">
><font face="courier new"><font size="2">if you see it as an attack, i would suggest to drop all attatchments to ego. if anything, i am just expressing a part of david's own mind. for in reality the boundries are but illusions. what i wrote, i did not "think" about it. it just came out. i am sorry if you were offended, just what flows flows. i no longer self-censor, because i believe the purity of the flow is more important than being "polite" anyways...silence will now speak for me.</font> </font>
><font face="arial" size="2"></font>
><font face="arial" size="2">(warning: tongue very firmly in cheek:) </font>
><font face="arial" size="2"></font>
><font face="arial" size="2">guess what guys... the master codes to maintaining an intimaterelationship...you'llhave the powerin the palm of your hand once you apply this wisdom.... (just a word from the "monkey mind") </font>

Jeremy Weiland
02-07-2001, 08:01 PM
<table bgcolor="#ffffff">
<blockquote style="border-left: #000000 2px solid; margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px">
><font face="arial">
></font><font size="2"><tt>>>if you see it as an attack, i would suggest to drop all >>attatchments to >>ego. if anything, i am just expressing a part >>of david's own</tt><tt></font><font size="1">mind.
>>for in reality the boundries are but illusions. what i wrote, i did
>>not "think" about it. it just came out. i am sorry if you were
>>offended, just what flows flows. i no longer self-censor, because i
>>believe the purity of the flow is more important than being "polite"
>>anyways...silence will now speak for me.</font></tt>
><tt><font size="1">
</font></tt><font size="2"><font size="2"> first of all, being polite is an absolute requirement of being on any list. you must take responsibility for what you post, regardless of how it came to you. i respect your right to post, but you cannot just ignore the feelings of others in doing it. frankly, i find your attitude irresponsible, jason. :-( </font></font>
><font size="2"><font size="1"> </font>while dropping all attachments to the ego may be easy for you, jason, some of usneed to take a more gradual approach. my ego and my intellect come together, for the moment, and you'll just have to accept that that's the case with most of us here on the asc2k list (right?). i don't think it's an excuse to ignore the points i brought up in my last post. </font>
><font size="2"> whether i was offended or not isn't the point: the point is that you were not expressing the complete truth of david's work, and therefore much of what you said was distorting the work's message. read what i wrote again please, because it was more than just a mere accusation of attack; it was a rebuttal of what you wrote, err, "flowed" :-) if you want to foster discussion on a certain topic, you should address the points that are brought up, rather than throwing this ego-attachment "red herring" out. </font>
><font size="2"> i don't believe you should censor yourself, but you should be critical of what happens to "flow." just because it flowed out of you doesn't mean it's the objective truth that everyone on this list needs to embrace, nor does it necessarily have to be very true at all. when you make sweeping statements about a body of work, a little more responsibility should be taken for your comments than simply that it "flowed." in this case, thecomments you made overlooked critical points in david's work, and these points would have provided you the answers that you claimed were not found in the work. it was these points that i sought to bring to your attention in the most loving manner possible for me. i hope you did not take *my* post as an attack, for it was certainly not meant that way, though i did want my point to be clear.</font>
><font size="2"> if someone points out something which you have overlooked, the logical thing to do is to address that rather than, once again, marginalizing the person's point of view based on "ego attachments" which i am quite sure you as well as all of us share to some degree. since we all have this in common, how can you use that as a basis for downplaying one person's truth, while ignoring your own egocentricism in expressing your own views? it seems like a double standard to me, and if i misunderstand your reasoning please correct me.</font>
><font size="2"> i am completely aware that any perception of attack is my own doing, and i take responsibility for that perception. i am trying to share the philosophy of david's work, to the best of my understanding, with you, and i assure you that any emotions are purely periphery to this. i wish you love and light.</font>
><font size="2"> jeremy</font>
><tt>

--- in asc2k@y..., "jeremy weiland" <jweiland@n...> wrote:
> all i can say, jason, is that you have every right to express
the truth that you find within yourself. however, is it necessary to
attack david because he has expressed that truth within him? nobody
is saying that you have to agree with david's work, but to cast
asperations at him because you think he is "in the ego"... pull the
splinter out of your own eye first, my friend.
> in case your are interested in understanding david's work, i
will try to address your points in the hope that david won't (please
i hope that you do not respond to this email from jason, david, as
this is exactly the type of situation that you're supposed to be
avoiding!!!! you have stated your position - leave the arguing to
us). david does not say that you have to be "enlightened" to a
certain degree to ascend. the ra material and david both agree that
you must be *polarized* at least 51% service to others to ascend to
4d&#43; and at least 95% service to self to ascend 4d-. now this is very
very different than being enlightened, or having conscious
understanding of metaphysics and spirituality. it is a measure of
your inner development and the lessons you have learned in your
experiences in 3d. obviously, if you are living consciously, it's
much easier to polarize, but the vast majority of the planet is
polarizing without conscious knowledge of the loo or spiritual
teachings in general. david and related scholars are basically
saying that ascension occurs when you're ready, and that if you don't
ascend, it's not the end of the world (figuratively, of course :-)
since you will simply repeat the cycle and learn the lessons you need
to. to not ascend does not mean you are a bad person, it just means
you haven't yet learned everything you came here to learn.
> we're all still dealing with the experience of ego; it is not a
liability, it's an asset, a tool. if things that david says don't
resonate with you, forget about it - it won't hurt you. but if you
are going to discuss them, you could at least initiate discussion
rather than attack.
> you are not obligated in the least to take part in anything you
view as "idle speculation". but if you want to challenge it,
challenge it with facts and principle rather than casting asperations
about someone being "in their ego."
> i hope you can see where i'm coming from and that in the future
you can partcipate in a more productive manner.
> l/l
> jeremy
> ----- original message -----
> from: fa fa fooey
> to: asc2k@y...
> sent: wednesday, february 07, 2001 4:19 pm
> subject: [asc2k] the numbers of the harvest
>
>
> i am finding myself in an interesting position today. i have
followed
> david's work and others of a similiar nature. i read a post of
> david's on this group recently that implied the "harvest" is
really
> not going to be a wide-scale planetary ascension, but just for
the
> lucky few who can be "gotten to". i find this a troubling vision,
and
> perhaps even lacking in deep compassion. really the reason is
simple,
> i see most people yearning for love and truth, but not knowing
where
> to find it. since its fair to say most people do not have access
to
> the internet, and most people do not know of great teachers of
> meditation such as osho, krishnamurti, buddha, etc. then it would
> appear that no matter how the massess might desire within to be
> spiritually awake, there is little they can do in their current
> situations.
>
> the bottom line is, if one does not understand the nature
> of the mind, then one is perpetually trapped in one's ego
construct,
> no? and in that case, self-centeredness is almost a given, sort
of
> impossible to not be, if the disease ultimately is identification
> with thought. with that point, i suggest that in my vision, and i
> assume it's okay for me to state this. in my vision, all will be
> flooded with the energies of love, and a spontaneous
enlightenment, a
> critical mass being reached, all will "waken" and we will
> collectively shift from fear based existence in duality to love
based
> existence in oneness. why do we have to continue with the
negative
> concepts associated with only a "few" ascending. this seems to
lack a
> fundamental awareness of the problem, which ultimately is the
mind.
>
> this seemingly lack of wisdom in david's work prompts me to
> suggest why perhaps david has taken this path. i do not suggest
it is
> all negative, but i do believe in the power of love as a
> transformative force which can reveal the truth within. i
> noticed david has been saying lately in updates and posts that he
is
> going to meditate and focus exclusively on his "soul work" to me
it
> would seem that before david completed, and even published his
work
> on the "harvest" it would have done him well to have meditated
> intensively before he beagn the work. for a man in his ego, no
matter
> how open to "et transmissions" and "psychic abilities" would
first
> want to reach an enlightened state of consciousness as we have
seen
> in buddha, osho, krishnamurti, jesus, etc.
>
> to do the work first, there is a fundamental problem, no matter
> how "scientific" its basis. david is still generally in the ego.
this
> is the problem. i have absorbed all his information and found it
> quite compelling, but i think that i will wait until david has
truly
> undergone a shift in consciousness before i continue to give any
> credence to his predictions of "how many" will make it. until
that
> time, i will continue to focus exclusively on meditation myself.
i
> will no longer discuss any 2012, harvest, critical mass,
> consciousness, fifth dimension, etc. for until i am centered in
self,
> these are just words, no more valid or less than the next ego in
> speculation. to even predict to me seems to be denying the
> fundamental law of the universe that every moment is new!
>
> if david is trying to scare people in meditating, that too seem
to
> not be the way of light. i cannot say more since my ego is now
> unwinding to such an extreme i think it's best to remain silent.
i
> hope david continues to go deeper within. i hope david would look
> into kundalini meditation, which would facilitate the opening of
all
> his energy centers up to the crown chakra, so that david will be
> merged with the divine. when that union has taken place, i would
be
> most interested in how the nature of david's work will change, if
he
> would continue with the work at all! i'm not sure at that point
any
> of us will care.
>
> perhaps nothing needs be done but deepen the silence which
increases
> the prescence of the one! that to me would be the greatest
service to
> humanity, and would see to allow for an increase in "harvest" for
as
> i change, so does the universe. each additional enlightened being
> changes the game dramatically. i think there is a high
possibility
> that before 2012, there will be millions of enlightened beings on
the
> planet. when this is manifest, the power of the prescence and
force
> of love will transmute any ideas that can be seen as negative
> including a "small harvest" all you need is love.
>
> let's transform ourselves, lets leave words for a later time, for
now
> it is just the mind speculating, and this seems to be a rather
futile
> exercise, even as developed a theory as david's, it's still mind-
> stuff. words no matter how intricate, cannot capture this moment.
> what may or may not happen in 2012 is primarily dependent on our
> state of consciousness. david seems to imply most people are
> not "fit" i suggest they havent had much choice due to the subtle
> nature of the mind and religions lack of explaining it, never
mind
> all other resources. not intending to attack david as much as
point
> out that what he is saying now may not hold true in the future,
as he
> gets deeper within himself! this to me should be kept in mind,
like
> anything else, even davids work cannot be seen as a fixed entity,
but
> rather a flowing journey through his own awareness, and the end
> result being he meditates and wakes up, then that was reason
enough.
> but to focus on the details, is not necessarily that wise. we
should
> all wake up first and then discuss. for how can one trust ones
> judgement when one is still in the dualistic mode of
consciousness?
>
> time to turn off the internet and go within!
>
> peace.
>
> jason
>
>
> yahoo! groups sponsor
>
> www.
>
>
>
>
> to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>

<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>
</blockquote>

Jeremy Weiland
02-07-2001, 08:04 PM
<table bgcolor="#ffffff">
<blockquote style="border-left: #000000 2px solid; margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px">
><font face="arial" size="2">>>(warning: tongue very firmly in cheek:) </font>
><font face="arial" size="2"></font>
><font face="arial" size="2">>>guess what guys... the master codes to maintaining an >>intimaterelationship...you'llhave the powerin the palm of your hand once you apply >>this wisdom.... (just a word from the "monkey mind") </font>
>
><font size="2">you had to respond, didn't you, david? <g></font>
><font size="2">well, at least the monkey mind identified himself this time instead of posing as you. :-)</font>
><font size="2">that dern monkey...</font>
>
><font size="2">l/l</font>
><font size="2">jeremy</font></blockquote>

Clark stewart
02-08-2001, 01:54 AM
this is some fun stuff...!!!

you guys know that if we all just allowed any old flow com'n through w/o out
any discernment then you may get some truth, but aswell the bad and the
possible ugly..
so this is were one can easly self justify any action no matter how bad as a
divine experience, as it is all apart of the one.
let us contemplate, and question everything, and as much as dw is on the
ball, he is just as fallible as us..monkey see monkey do..
this is why ra continuely said,"i am ra"
to allways question, to me means to fine tune the flow, no presumptions,
and one could see this as hampering, but it is a touchy issue, but enebitbly
becomes obvious.(hence tongue caught)
i rem. a buddhist story by a lama, and she was told by her teacher to
question every teaching. this was intialing baffling, as she thought she
could 'just' trust all his teachings , cause he was soo enlightened..
this questioning brings you to a deeper level of understanding, then just
accepting and letting whatever flow..
this path of flowing isn't wrong, just a process, so i bless you jason and
hope this makes some sense to you, and you may wanna try this for your own
anyalsis, please don't take my word for it...smiles..

disapline/mindfulness/dilagence/disacernment....truth...

p.s how do you disattach w/o knowing what you are disattaching from..?
....."know thyself well"....ego and all

in l/l,
clark/fudoshin/one.......monkey.mind#9




> >>if you see it as an attack, i would suggest to drop all >>attatchments
>to >>ego. if anything, i am just expressing a part >>of david's own mind.
> >>for in reality the boundries are but illusions. what i wrote, i did
> >>not "think" about it. it just came out. i am sorry if you were
> >>offended, just what flows flows. i no longer self-censor, because i
> >>believe the purity of the flow is more important than being "polite"
> >>anyways...silence will now speak for me.
>
> first of all, being polite is an absolute requirement of being on
>any list. you must take responsibility for what you post, regardless of
>how it came to you. i respect your right to post, but you cannot just
>ignore the feelings of others in doing it. frankly, i find your attitude
>irresponsible, jason. :-(
> while dropping all attachments to the ego may be easy for you,
>jason, some of us need to take a more gradual approach. my ego and my
>intellect come together, for the moment, and you'll just have to accept
>that that's the case with most of us here on the asc2k list (right?). i
>don't think it's an excuse to ignore the points i brought up in my last
>post.
> whether i was offended or not isn't the point: the point is that you
>were not expressing the complete truth of david's work, and therefore much
>of what you said was distorting the work's message. read what i wrote
>again please, because it was more than just a mere accusation of attack; it
>was a rebuttal of what you wrote, err, "flowed" :-) if you want to foster
>discussion on a certain topic, you should address the points that are
>brought up, rather than throwing this ego-attachment "red herring" out.
> i don't believe you should censor yourself, but you should be
>critical of what happens to "flow." just because it flowed out of you
>doesn't mean it's the objective truth that everyone on this list needs to
>embrace, nor does it necessarily have to be very true at all. when you
>make sweeping statements about a body of work, a little more responsibility
>should be taken for your comments than simply that it "flowed." in this
>case, the comments you made overlooked critical points in david's work, and
>these points would have provided you the answers that you claimed were not
>found in the work. it was these points that i sought to bring to your
>attention in the most loving manner possible for me. i hope you did not
>take *my* post as an attack, for it was certainly not meant that way,
>though i did want my point to be clear.
> if someone points out something which you have overlooked, the
>logical thing to do is to address that rather than, once again,
>marginalizing the person's point of view based on "ego attachments" which i
>am quite sure you as well as all of us share to some degree. since we all
>have this in common, how can you use that as a basis for downplaying one
>person's truth, while ignoring your own egocentricism in expressing your
>own views? it seems like a double standard to me, and if i misunderstand
>your reasoning please correct me.
> i am completely aware that any perception of attack is my own doing,
>and i take responsibility for that perception. i am trying to share the
>philosophy of david's work, to the best of my understanding, with you, and
>i assure you that any emotions are purely periphery to this. i wish you
>love and light.
> jeremy
>
>
> --- in asc2k@y..., "jeremy weiland" <jweiland@n...> wrote:
> > all i can say, jason, is that you have every right to express
> the truth that you find within yourself. however, is it necessary to
> attack david because he has expressed that truth within him? nobody
> is saying that you have to agree with david's work, but to cast
> asperations at him because you think he is "in the ego"... pull the
> splinter out of your own eye first, my friend.
> > in case your are interested in understanding david's work, i
> will try to address your points in the hope that david won't (please
> i hope that you do not respond to this email from jason, david, as
> this is exactly the type of situation that you're supposed to be
> avoiding!!!! you have stated your position - leave the arguing to
> us). david does not say that you have to be "enlightened" to a
> certain degree to ascend. the ra material and david both agree that
> you must be *polarized* at least 51% service to others to ascend to
> 4d+ and at least 95% service to self to ascend 4d-. now this is very
> very different than being enlightened, or having conscious
> understanding of metaphysics and spirituality. it is a measure of
> your inner development and the lessons you have learned in your
> experiences in 3d. obviously, if you are living consciously, it's
> much easier to polarize, but the vast majority of the planet is
> polarizing without conscious knowledge of the loo or spiritual
> teachings in general. david and related scholars are basically
> saying that ascension occurs when you're ready, and that if you don't
> ascend, it's not the end of the world (figuratively, of course :-)
> since you will simply repeat the cycle and learn the lessons you need
> to. to not ascend does not mean you are a bad person, it just means
> you haven't yet learned everything you came here to learn.
> > we're all still dealing with the experience of ego; it is not a
> liability, it's an asset, a tool. if things that david says don't
> resonate with you, forget about it - it won't hurt you. but if you
> are going to discuss them, you could at least initiate discussion
> rather than attack.
> > you are not obligated in the least to take part in anything you
> view as "idle speculation". but if you want to challenge it,
> challenge it with facts and principle rather than casting asperations
> about someone being "in their ego."
> > i hope you can see where i'm coming from and that in the future
> you can partcipate in a more productive manner.
> > l/l
> > jeremy
> > ----- original message -----
> > from: fa fa fooey
> > to: asc2k@y...
> > sent: wednesday, february 07, 2001 4:19 pm
> > subject: [asc2k] the numbers of the harvest
> >
> >
> > i am finding myself in an interesting position today. i have
> followed
> > david's work and others of a similiar nature. i read a post of
> > david's on this group recently that implied the "harvest" is
> really
> > not going to be a wide-scale planetary ascension, but just for
> the
> > lucky few who can be "gotten to". i find this a troubling vision,
> and
> > perhaps even lacking in deep compassion. really the reason is
> simple,
> > i see most people yearning for love and truth, but not knowing
> where
> > to find it. since its fair to say most people do not have access
> to
> > the internet, and most people do not know of great teachers of
> > meditation such as osho, krishnamurti, buddha, etc. then it would
> > appear that no matter how the massess might desire within to be
> > spiritually awake, there is little they can do in their current
> > situations.
> >
> > the bottom line is, if one does not understand the nature
> > of the mind, then one is perpetually trapped in one's ego
> construct,
> > no? and in that case, self-centeredness is almost a given, sort
> of
> > impossible to not be, if the disease ultimately is identification
> > with thought. with that point, i suggest that in my vision, and i
> > assume it's okay for me to state this. in my vision, all will be
> > flooded with the energies of love, and a spontaneous
> enlightenment, a
> > critical mass being reached, all will "waken" and we will
> > collectively shift from fear based existence in duality to love
> based
> > existence in oneness. why do we have to continue with the
> negative
> > concepts associated with only a "few" ascending. this seems to
> lack a
> > fundamental awareness of the problem, which ultimately is the
> mind.
> >
> > this seemingly lack of wisdom in david's work prompts me to
> > suggest why perhaps david has taken this path. i do not suggest
> it is
> > all negative, but i do believe in the power of love as a
> > transformative force which can reveal the truth within. i
> > noticed david has been saying lately in updates and posts that he
> is
> > going to meditate and focus exclusively on his "soul work" to me
> it
> > would seem that before david completed, and even published his
> work
> > on the "harvest" it would have done him well to have meditated
> > intensively before he beagn the work. for a man in his ego, no
> matter
> > how open to "et transmissions" and "psychic abilities" would
> first
> > want to reach an enlightened state of consciousness as we have
> seen
> > in buddha, osho, krishnamurti, jesus, etc.
> >
> > to do the work first, there is a fundamental problem, no matter
> > how "scientific" its basis. david is still generally in the ego.
> this
> > is the problem. i have absorbed all his information and found it
> > quite compelling, but i think that i will wait until david has
> truly
> > undergone a shift in consciousness before i continue to give any
> > credence to his predictions of "how many" will make it. until
> that
> > time, i will continue to focus exclusively on meditation myself.
> i
> > will no longer discuss any 2012, harvest, critical mass,
> > consciousness, fifth dimension, etc. for until i am centered in
> self,
> > these are just words, no more valid or less than the next ego in
> > speculation. to even predict to me seems to be denying the
> > fundamental law of the universe that every moment is new!
> >
> > if david is trying to scare people in meditating, that too seem
> to
> > not be the way of light. i cannot say more since my ego is now
> > unwinding to such an extreme i think it's best to remain silent.
> i
> > hope david continues to go deeper within. i hope david would look
> > into kundalini meditation, which would facilitate the opening of
> all
> > his energy centers up to the crown chakra, so that david will be
> > merged with the divine. when that union has taken place, i would
> be
> > most interested in how the nature of david's work will change, if
> he
> > would continue with the work at all! i'm not sure at that point
> any
> > of us will care.
> >
> > perhaps nothing needs be done but deepen the silence which
> increases
> > the prescence of the one! that to me would be the greatest
> service to
> > humanity, and would see to allow for an increase in "harvest" for
> as
> > i change, so does the universe. each additional enlightened being
> > changes the game dramatically. i think there is a high
> possibility
> > that before 2012, there will be millions of enlightened beings on
> the
> > planet. when this is manifest, the power of the prescence and
> force
> > of love will transmute any ideas that can be seen as negative
> > including a "small harvest" all you need is love.
> >
> > let's transform ourselves, lets leave words for a later time, for
> now
> > it is just the mind speculating, and this seems to be a rather
> futile
> > exercise, even as developed a theory as david's, it's still mind-
> > stuff. words no matter how intricate, cannot capture this moment.
> > what may or may not happen in 2012 is primarily dependent on our
> > state of consciousness. david seems to imply most people are
> > not "fit" i suggest they havent had much choice due to the subtle
> > nature of the mind and religions lack of explaining it, never
> mind
> > all other resources. not intending to attack david as much as
> point
> > out that what he is saying now may not hold true in the future,
> as he
> > gets deeper within himself! this to me should be kept in mind,
> like
> > anything else, even davids work cannot be seen as a fixed entity,
> but
> > rather a flowing journey through his own awareness, and the end
> > result being he meditates and wakes up, then that was reason
> enough.
> > but to focus on the details, is not necessarily that wise. we
> should
> > all wake up first and then discuss. for how can one trust ones
> > judgement when one is still in the dualistic mode of
> consciousness?
> >
> > time to turn off the internet and go within!
> >
> > peace.
> >
> > jason
> >
> >
> > yahoo! groups sponsor
> >
> > www.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=zcau_cznszxeqicqpib2xuxcr3cr6bwrh0dq6h lsq844dwax7jnum9y9veteqkbyyrud0alk-c0hbqenw93ubuq6fkip)
>
>
>
> yahoo! groups sponsor
>
> www.
>
>
>
>
> to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=zcau_cznszxeqicqpib2xuxcr3cr6bwrh0dq6h lsq844dwax7jnum9y9veteqkbyyrud0alk-c0hbqenw93ubuq6fkip)
>
>
>

__________________________________________________ _______________________
get your private, free e-mail from msn hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.