from the article mawk posted....
"even after substituting eons for days, the order of events was obviously
wrong. it made no sense to have light come first, and then to claim that the
sun, the moon and the stars - the obvious sources of light in the night sky
of the ancient world - were created only subsequently, be it days or eons
later. one could, of course, generalize light to mean simply energy, and
thus claim a reference to the big bang, but that would, to me, be more of a
stretch than a revelation."
hmmm a new one my husband through at me that i can't grasp yet for the
"literal" interpretation of the creation story is...that god created it
already all old....etc..i guess this assumes fossils everything were already
in the correct layers...i know i know...it has many holes...but it is a new
one on the fundamentalist side that i hadn't heard before...
tiffani
----- original message -----
from: "mawk" <mawk109@... (/group/asc2k/post?postid=rjxzda0bug2g8uzxyphvm8nrccexz9xk-hpawo7abrf49rtmrj-_oo924u2f6az1uvbgs8w2uynno1uk)>
to: <asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=vlho4brrwvhijryvnle6xeypdbnyf1phcc5oik fhlvpjrwhnz_ibentj9mvk2qo2zopadctrjya7hmuv)>
sent: friday, february 22, 2002 2:40 am
subject: [asc2k] brilliant disguise: light, matter and the zero-point field
>
> hi all,
>
> just amazing where hal puthoff's name turns up. he was one of the pioneers
> of remote viewing research at sri in the late 70's & early 80's. the link
to
> the following article puts "zero point" meaning to the statement "let
there
> be light".
>
> http://www.science-spirit.org/articles/articledetail.cfm?article_id=126
>
> cheers,
>
> mawk
>
>
>
> to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=1i2km4m_0hb5b8xvvsj0pzylfcsv2jpo_yo8jf oqhju72gdodz0r6h7pdqgd-k5eme-osbvcjbdopu9v1z5wl717gg)
>
>
>
> your use of yahoo! groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>