wintersun
08-20-2008, 10:16 AM
One thing I just noticed... In the law of one study guide, in definitions, no 8. ALIGNMENT.
Here's a quote:
8. Alignment = when discussing the questions the group would ask, the "alignment" indicated whether or not the questions were oriented positively (service-to-others or STO) or negatively (service-to-self or STS). Another "solved mystery" when reading the Law of One source texts is why Ra would keep asking for the ritual objects to be realigned.
[Example: "You may observe a slight misalignment between book, candle and perpendicularity of censer. This is not significant, but as we have said the cumulative effects upon this instrument (Carla) are not well." (B1, S21, 196)]
The group discovered that these statements actually had nothing to do with the positions of the objects; rather it was an "encoded" means of evaluating how positive (service-to-others) the questions for that session had been … i.e. how much they had focused on the Law of One.
9. This was the most that Ra could do, in terms of preserving free will by encoding the warning in the language of symbolism, in order to keep the group on track.
If the group asked too many "misaligned" questions, and did not listen to the symbolic warnings to cease and desist asking such questions, (i.e. asking about anything not directly oriented towards the evolution of mind, body and spirit,) then Ra would have no choice but to gradually allow themselves to be replaced by a negative entity.
This entity would masquerade as positive, and attempt to discredit the group by giving inaccurate information … most commonly in the form of specific time-encoded prophecies of doom that would inevitably fail to come true. Modern channeling is replete with examples of just this.
10. This celestial response to "misaligned questions" … i.e. the blending of negative entities into an apparently positive channel’s message … is said to be an un-alterable universal law. There is no protection against this except for the alignment of the questions being asked, and how well the lives of the participants aligned with the teachings being given: "Please guard your alignments carefully." (B3, S53, 23)
This is the main reason why almost all of today’s channeled material is heavily distorted, and does not agree on many points with the Law of One series, or with any other material. The group became aware of this potential problem soon after Book One, and became far more careful to never ask "transient" or unimportant questions, as they were called.
This Study Guide documents all of the major answers that Ra gave, including answers to questions that they didn’t think were well aligned. We do this so as to present a well-rounded portrait of what information actually came through, to assist in your studies.
Does this what is said means that, if for example, I was a channeler, and started asking questions about my own personal nature, that I would be like STS, and that the negative entities would take over and misguide me?
Is that what it means??
So, one should never ask any questions that are of personal nature, rather then questions that are considered on universal value?
Here's a quote:
8. Alignment = when discussing the questions the group would ask, the "alignment" indicated whether or not the questions were oriented positively (service-to-others or STO) or negatively (service-to-self or STS). Another "solved mystery" when reading the Law of One source texts is why Ra would keep asking for the ritual objects to be realigned.
[Example: "You may observe a slight misalignment between book, candle and perpendicularity of censer. This is not significant, but as we have said the cumulative effects upon this instrument (Carla) are not well." (B1, S21, 196)]
The group discovered that these statements actually had nothing to do with the positions of the objects; rather it was an "encoded" means of evaluating how positive (service-to-others) the questions for that session had been … i.e. how much they had focused on the Law of One.
9. This was the most that Ra could do, in terms of preserving free will by encoding the warning in the language of symbolism, in order to keep the group on track.
If the group asked too many "misaligned" questions, and did not listen to the symbolic warnings to cease and desist asking such questions, (i.e. asking about anything not directly oriented towards the evolution of mind, body and spirit,) then Ra would have no choice but to gradually allow themselves to be replaced by a negative entity.
This entity would masquerade as positive, and attempt to discredit the group by giving inaccurate information … most commonly in the form of specific time-encoded prophecies of doom that would inevitably fail to come true. Modern channeling is replete with examples of just this.
10. This celestial response to "misaligned questions" … i.e. the blending of negative entities into an apparently positive channel’s message … is said to be an un-alterable universal law. There is no protection against this except for the alignment of the questions being asked, and how well the lives of the participants aligned with the teachings being given: "Please guard your alignments carefully." (B3, S53, 23)
This is the main reason why almost all of today’s channeled material is heavily distorted, and does not agree on many points with the Law of One series, or with any other material. The group became aware of this potential problem soon after Book One, and became far more careful to never ask "transient" or unimportant questions, as they were called.
This Study Guide documents all of the major answers that Ra gave, including answers to questions that they didn’t think were well aligned. We do this so as to present a well-rounded portrait of what information actually came through, to assist in your studies.
Does this what is said means that, if for example, I was a channeler, and started asking questions about my own personal nature, that I would be like STS, and that the negative entities would take over and misguide me?
Is that what it means??
So, one should never ask any questions that are of personal nature, rather then questions that are considered on universal value?