nemesis

[Clark stewart]

wow rod!!,,

that is some stuff, i haven't even finished the seqential conversations, and
your dumping more...
well before i go off on the conversation doc,
i would like to ask about this, " magneto-spheres" concept and how we may be
experiencing 'trailer' scenes of the upcoming main play (nrg).
if understand you correctly thus far, we are looking at a geometric
alteration, and i canonly imagine that this will have profound effects on
the em , and therefore most of oour technology.
as i have also understood, even during our solar storms, our dynamo class
generators are encurring some wear and tear, and that the increase in sa
storms, will eventually take down our global power grid.
either uniformly over time or like a catastrophic quebec occurence.

i also see that coulombs constant should change...?

and yes i would love to hear, see more, on anything you got, when i get some
cash i would like to order anything else you have.
also anything that may be missing from the conversations doc would be
appreciated as well.

peace and love yall,
clark.....2160

__________________________________________________ _______________
send and receive hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

[rodj]

<table>


<font color="#0000ff" face="tahoma" size="2">clark wrote:

wow rod!!,,

well before i go off on the conversation doc,
i would like to ask about this, " magneto-spheres" concept and
how we may be experiencing 'trailer' scenes of the upcoming main
play (nrg). if i understand you correctly thus far, we are looking
at a geometric alteration, and i can only imagine that this will
have profound effects on the em , and therefore most of our
technology.

peace and love yall,
clark.....2160

</font><font color="#0000ff" face="tahoma" size="2">clark,

thank you for the solar storm info. i find it very useful and will
research its implications further.

when i speak of em transitions i am referring to natural conditions
that are beyond common understanding. it is known that every mass,
from a molecule to a sun has an extra magnetic field complex, meaning
out and beyond, say, like an aura. with respect to astral masses,
this is referred to as a magneto-sphere. on a molecular level it
shows up in valance, too often simplified as surface charge.

there is an unknown factor that controls the magnitude, polar
alignment and the frequency involved. that factor is multi poles
in consequent arrangements. somehow the experimental data that
showed the phenomenon of consequent poles early in the last century
seems to have slipped through the voids inherent in quantum science.
you will see mention of consequence poles in the conversations....

we are presently seeing drastic changes in magneto-spheres for
solar masses. as mentioned in my article the sun's is expanding
and those of planets are contracting. in 1982, drawing from ideas
in 77, i predicted the polar alignment will shift 32 degrees.
the latest data indicates that the earth's magneto-sphere has
now shifted 32 degrees. the polar aligning aspects within the
earth will slowly shift to match. even more slowly the procession
of axis for the earth's revolution will correct to the magnetic
shift.<span class="563454207-16122001">not the full 32 degrees, pehaps the ra are correct at 20 degrees.</span></font></p>


<font color="#0000ff" face="tahoma" size="2"><span class="563454207-16122001"></span>will that happen in a cataclysmic way? possibly, but unlikely
unless major perturbations like asteroid strike etc. however, within
the earths own parameters there is not a force drastic enough to
produce rapid polar shift.

simple explanations of the not-understood part are not easy. em
field theory cannot be taken further within the quantum assumptions.
it leaves very few common term to go forward on for realizing a
multiverse inter-phase field model.

however, if anyone wishes to venture into a dialoged about the moment
inter-phase of multiverse let me know.

consider the possibilities with wisdom and bravery,

rod

</font><font color="#000000" face="tahoma" size="2">__________________________________________________ _______________
send and receive hotmail on your mobile device: </font><font color="#000000" face="tahoma" size="2">http://mobile.msn.com</font> (http://mobile.msn.com)


<font face="tahoma" size="2">------------------------ yahoo! groups sponsor ---------------------~-->
unlimited pc-pc calling at crystal voice! - only $1/mo.
download your free 30 day trial. click here.
</font><font face="tahoma" size="2">http://us.click.yahoo.com/gb1xvb/gxbdaa/yssfaa/1.xolb/tm</font> (http://us.click.yahoo.com/gb1xvb/gxbdaa/yssfaa/1.xolb/tm)
<font face="tahoma" size="2">---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com



your use of yahoo! groups is subject to </font><font face="tahoma" size="2">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/</font> (http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/)<font face="tahoma"> </font></p>

[Clark stewart]

thanks rj, for making more sense of this crazy system,

some questions,

>
>there is an unknown factor that controls the magnitude, polar
>alignment and the frequency involved. that factor is multi poles
>in consequent arrangements. somehow the experimental data that
>showed the phenomenon of consequent poles early in the last century
>seems to have slipped through the voids inherent in quantum science.
>you will see mention of consequence poles in the conversations....

yes i have covered this, and found many correlations with edward
leedsklnin's theories on magnetism.
he mentions at one pt, that there is no 0 lat , 0 b field, that there is
allways, male and female components traversing. and sometimes other poles..
also shows how you can make/understand this consequent pole aspect.much like
your own ex's.

>
> will that happen in a cataclysmic way? possibly, but unlikely
>unless major perturbations like asteroid strike etc. however, within
>the earths own parameters there is not a force drastic enough to
>produce rapid polar shift.

could you then explain, why einstein promoted/backed charles hapgood's
theories of the lithosphere slipping, producing the anomlies we have found
in the siberian area, like undigested food in the stomach.
thus, a cataclysmic event.
i also understand that , that cycle had different things happening, but
maybe you could illuminate (if possible) what it was that einstein saw then
, that is not applicable now..


>
>however, if anyone wishes to venture into a dialoged about the moment
>inter-phase of multiverse let me know.
>

i am about do, and my prenancy can't hold too much longer, but my ear is
allways intently listening rj so please go forth, and rip it up.

i would like to put one thing forward on this very subject,
this is how 3rds, 6ths, 9ths fit into this trans-model, like i am trying to
visualize (w 3-d model'n) how by dividing the lines of a tetra into 3rds you
get the archemdian class objects.
well how far does this process go, and can we rep. the inter-phase aspects w
a sub-class to the archemedian class, that would denote 6ths of the
tetra...and dare we goto 9ths....?

this to me is helpful for defining transmorphing characteristics, which then
would get into my questions about the h, and he geometries, and how those
exactly spin with relation to the periodic table, and each other as this
didn't seem clear, could you explain this furtherly.

also i have been measuring the arc values of recorded n&#43;s-pole positions,
and i found them to be consistently from 90-96 to about 145 degrees.
i feel that 5 degrees could account for error of both poles, and that if we
agree w 150, then we have this 30 degree phase compensation of the tetra
field.
any comments on that...

well....till the next contraction.. :)

pbwyall

clark

>consider the possibilities with wisdom and bravery,

i, like to think that i do




__________________________________________________ _______________
send and receive hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com