PDA

View Full Version : just a qoute



Clark stewart
01-22-2001, 01:09 PM
just to rectify the vibe that may have off set some of you..

"were there no potential for misunderstanding and therefore, understanding,
there would be no experience."

yes it is a ra qoute that i pulled out of's scott's book, "universal
vision"..it came at just the right time, and i sent this to dw just to make
sure he got..so be at peace yall, it's for the greater good we have these
distortions..

in l/l,
c


>
> thanks for all the great suggestions from everyone. it really is
>quite exciting when the discussion that takes place here has a personal
>effect on your life. i wish i could have thanked everyone sooner, but the
>email server is being moronic.
> i have not read any dm (on matters dealing with acronyms of names and
>abbreviated typing, i yield to fudo - the recognized authority). however,
>it seems to keep being shoved in my face. this may be a sign. one thing's
>for sure - the importance of meditation and meditating well is not going to
>diminish in the coming years, and the different perspectives we all bring
>to this dialogue can only help make us better spiritual citizens. so
>thanks again to david and all those who have helped me with love and
>guidance.
> i'm sorry that this thread took a turn towards, well, a more negative
>tone. i know that i get major negative vibes whenever there is an attack
>upon something that is dear to another's heart, no matter what the reason.
>there's got to be a way that we can have a discussion on this list without
>reverting to fallen behavioral patterns of attack / defend. although that
>pattern is the norm for most internet discussion lists (trust me on that
>one :-) we should strive to break the mold.
> i just get a panicky little anxious feeling whenever we're telling
>people that what they believe is wrong. if we're gonna be left-brained
>about the whole mess, we might as well revert to "logical positivism" and
>give up looking for anything beyond that. part of being beyond that is
>realizing that the whole story is not always known or knowable. part of
>where we're at is about trusting people to be masters of themselves. part
>of it is about admitting our own fallibility. a big part of it is about
>faith in that which we hold as the essence and foundation of everything we
>believe in (and argue over). as over-emotional and cliche as it sounds, we
>really do have infinitely more in common than different. (c'mon, dubya's in
>office now; he's a uniter, not a divider <lol>).
> c'mon. we're all charting unknown waters here - and given that
>universal fact, we can cut each other a little slack, can't we? until the
>next episode...
> in love and light,
> jeremy
> ----- original message -----
> from: david wilcock
> to: asc2k@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=eefwnt_jrdprwqhygbyylz59dgreztp-8ygd6ove8rpyfnffesbxqp9m6rnlxss8bwr-wprljukr)
> sent: friday, january 19, 2001 7:37 pm
> subject: re: [asc2k] meditation suggestions
>
>
> i had a conversation with christopher naughton, metaphysical radio talk
>show host, recently, and he said that the work of lazaris associated the
>"ear blast" with psychic sensitivity. specifically, he said that the
>temporal lobes of the brain become far more able to resonate with and sense
>minute changes in electromagnetic energy. i have noticed that there are
>times where it seems to happen as a result of an outside physical energy
>and not just spiritually-related events.
>
> as per the melchizedek (bernard perona) data it is fun to read as
>fantasy but completely unsubstantiated by anything other than his own
>channeling. show me david suzuki's own published papers, please, and let me
>decide for myself instead of believing. and i find it very interesting that
>almost as soon as he started channeling in 1972, he predicted the end of
>the world only a few months away that august. naturally when this didn't
>happen he channeled that into the model as well. as ra says, when negative
>entities go online in a positive channel the first thing they will do is
>give messages of doom that do not come true and thus delegitimize the
>channel. case in point.
>
> the various money-making schemes and duplicity that mr. perona has
>indulged in, especially in the last five years, are totally obvious signs
>of negative entity influence for self-aggrandizement. i know of many people
>who have turned away in the last few years from all involvement with him.
>these lies have earned him widespread condemnation from the metaphysical
>community and, you will notice, a total lockout from all the big-named
>international talk radio circuits.
>
> (i was disappointed that laura lee did an entire show with him about his
>"miracle" ascension water that "slices, dices and heals the planet in a
>jiffy!" you remember, right? "just a few drops will completely depollute an
>entire lake..." et cetera. and what happens if you drink the formula
>"specially formulated for the human body?" "well," says mr. perona, "that's
>the most exciting part but it's classified and i can't discuss it in public
>-- yet." the whole thing turned out to be a fake but not before many people
>bought literally 700-dollar vials of water thinking it would make them
>ascend.)
>
> i don't dislike him or anyone else as a person, and yes the two books of
>his are actually fairly decent, but there are some highly significant
>problems with his teachings that are not difficult to find.
>
> the only part of those two mailings that might have a possibility of
>being true in my eyes is the idea that artificial objects may not hold
>their matter frequency after the shift. but even that is a big stretch and
>does not conform with most other data points that indicate many artifacts
>from our world that will be rediscovered later.
>
> i know that ra's information seems just as "out there" but unlike mr.
>perona, all the channelings are freely available and they predicted many
>concrete scientific facts well before their official discoveries, as i will
>discuss in convergence iii. and l/l research has never veered from the
>positive polarity or tried to manipulate their readers in any way.
>
> peace be with you -
>
> - david
> ----- original message -----
> from: clark stewart
> to: asc2k@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=eefwnt_jrdprwqhygbyylz59dgreztp-8ygd6ove8rpyfnffesbxqp9m6rnlxss8bwr-wprljukr)
> sent: friday, january 19, 2001 5:40 pm
> subject: re: [asc2k] meditation suggestions
>
>
> oh the ear buzzing, dw would know more than i, but it is assciated
>with
> overtone harmonics, and can be used for intuitional nudges..it has do
>with a
> deep sense of peace, that consists of bi-locational atomic bleed
>through..
> i am thinking about as a stimulation of a certain gland that may or
>may not
> be in this bio-shell but a parallel one..
> and the bleed through connects some of our glands, maybe pineal, and
> radiates outward from what seems to be a center pt. and reacts with
> something in the ears...it is like for me a dog whistle is going off,
>except
> for humans..
> i think of it as "spidy sences"..laughs..
> your on the rt track..your parents come from a different node of
> exsistance..no biggy, most of 'ours' do..
> any other comments , for this is just theoretical..?
>
> c
>
> >from: "jeremy weiland" <jweiland@... (/group/asc2k/post?postid=zfugi9m4gz4vu5nlamfzzkfrmkscdsevadqayn fyvjfjouyyflusmvfifity4dna2o_spykfdxz_u9uqyaw)>
> >reply-to: asc2k@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=eefwnt_jrdprwqhygbyylz59dgreztp-8ygd6ove8rpyfnffesbxqp9m6rnlxss8bwr-wprljukr)
> >to: "asc2kgroup" <asc2k@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=eefwnt_jrdprwqhygbyylz59dgreztp-8ygd6ove8rpyfnffesbxqp9m6rnlxss8bwr-wprljukr)>
> >subject: [asc2k] meditation suggestions
> >date: fri, 19 jan 2001 23:22:02 -0500
> >
> >hope everyone's doing alright!
> >
> >got a question for ya, in two parts.
> >
> >1. do you have any suggestions for establishing a daily meditation
> >routine? or, more importantly, how to go about the meditation
>process
> >(i.e. what works for you, good things to think about / concentrate
>on, body
> >position, etc.). i know i'm a perfectionist about this and always
>have to
> >do it "by the book" but i get a warm fuzzy feeling from hearing how
>other
> >people do this. i have a hard time with breathing regularly and
>swallowing
> >- i get so "still" that i forget to breathe, and once i remember i've
>lost
> >my concentration. any suggestions?
> >
> >2. frequently when i meditate (especially while laying in bed)
>when i
> >get deep into it, i find that my whole body gets a really wierd
>tingly
> >feeling, which is cool. it is however a sort of problem since the
>only way
> >to describe it is that my entire body feels "charged" like i'm a
>human
> >capacitor for virginia power. many times i also hear ringing in the
>ears.
> >it can be slightly uncomfortable at times and used to scare the
>beegeebies
> >out of me. although i've been dealing with it in my meditation, it
>is sort
> >of distracting b/c it is not neccessarily a relaxing feeling, if you
>know
> >what i mean.
> > my question is, is there a way i should be using this energy, or
>is
> >this a desirable feeling? is this energy coming in or stored energy
>(i.e.
> >stress that needs to be released)?does anyone know what i'm talking
>about?
> >my parents have been meditating for a while but they don't seem to
> >recognize what i'm talking about. i got the idea yesterday to ask
>the
> >group about this.
> >
> > the cool thing is that, after my meditation last night when i
>was
> >"charged" i had a series of dreams, and i only remembered the last
>one
> >completely but it was really cool, involving me spacewalking and
>robots and
> >falling through the atmosphere. the most uplifting thing that has
>happened
> >all year so far.
> >
> > oh, one other thing: anyone have any info on whether may 5, 2001
>is
> >important?
> >
> > take care,
> > jeremy
>
>
>__________________________________________________ _______________________
> get your private, free e-mail from msn hotmail at
>http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>
>
> to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=ilfwb2sie5fjjbmqdcyz7dhwb-z9vieflxkqv3jhud1h68zccf2tosbuget_fp7zacncetzygkpm uwf4qfm2unpzkeahomne)
>
>
>
>
> egroups sponsor
>
> get 3 cds for only $9.99!
>
>
> to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=ilfwb2sie5fjjbmqdcyz7dhwb-z9vieflxkqv3jhud1h68zccf2tosbuget_fp7zacncetzygkpm uwf4qfm2unpzkeahomne)
>
>
>

__________________________________________________ _______________________
get your private, free e-mail from msn hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Jeremy Weiland
01-22-2001, 04:50 PM
>just to rectify the vibe that may have off set some of you..
>
>"were there no potential for misunderstanding and therefore, understanding,
>there would be no experience."

absolutely. big honkin' word up ta that. what else are we here for, to
lead a perfect life? if we were, what would we need hollywood for? :-)
i see where you're coming from, clark. thank you for the truth you have
lovingly and openly been sharing with the group. it's great to have the
type of dialogue that we're having. the internet, as you are well aware,
does tend to put an edge onto the written word that isn't always intended.
i've seen this happen so many times... it's like we never learn :-) (btw,
personal observation: sarcasm and email do not mix! use with extreme
caution... luckily david is the bomb and a good sport :-)
i have learned so much by being on this list and studying the asc2k
material... i'm in it for the long haul, so take my comments with that in
mind. i'm just looking ahead to the time when we'll be able to make
progress on a more efficient (or maybe just perceivable) level, perhaps. oh
well... take care y'all and have a blessed week!
jeremy

johnson rod
01-24-2001, 01:19 AM
--- jeremy weiland <jweiland@... (/group/asc2k/post?postid=ddcvgq4-zqdv00s7ozzkkexanfel5gfunbjujchumqu5-tih4dlkjru7tyvkjzqxaa7gn5znvuiedjwx4y_zka)> wrote:

> personal observation: sarcasm and email do not mix!
> use with extreme
> caution...

i have to hardily agree. sarcasm, to be effective in
any way, requires a great deal of body language to
give it its true feeling. hense, it is difficult to
convey the feeling necessary with writing. anyone
genius enough to write sarcasm well is smart enough to
know that they shuld not do so.

rod

__________________________________________________
do you yahoo!?
yahoo! auctions - buy the things you want at great prices.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/