View Full Version : Polarizing measurements
Jeremy Weiland
11-21-2001, 10:35 AM
> Regarding the measurement of S.T.S. and
> S.T.O. orientation, I think that the reason
> that we are attempting to measure them is
> Ra's standard of being oriented to S.T.O. of
> 51% or more, hence we're getting wrapped up
> in trying to determine if we're reaching that
> minimum standard.
Right: Ra did not give us any measurable criteria to
evaluate our orientation by (at least from a 3D
perspective, since I think Ra does talk about how it
has something to do with your vibratory level).
Jeremy
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
Brian V. Cox
11-21-2001, 11:37 AM
would the act of quantizing and analyzing your percent
of relative STO be a STS act itself? by thinking "how
can I increase MY STO to better help MY chances of
positive polarity?"...vs just thinking "how can i help
others along their paths and be of service?" and being
of service without keeping "score" of how each act
is polarizing you either way.
just a thought...
-brian
> Regarding the measurement of S.T.S. and
> S.T.O. orientation, I think that the reason
> that we are attempting to measure them is
> Ra's standard of being oriented to S.T.O. of
> 51% or more, hence we're getting wrapped up
> in trying to determine if we're reaching that
> minimum standard.
>
> I agree with Rob: just relax and fly.
--------------
**In Lak'ech, Brian Cox - brian@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=MJ5udfxS8wJfZ-89_efsMsT7Fp_Q46n_LIjK2yoLRrHEeka5zrhcoEY0mcL9ZokX W90bln1K_v7E)
**MAGPU: Electric-Progressive-Trance-Improv-Fusion: http://www.magpu.com
**Campaign for the new time (13:20) http://www.tortuga.com/new/index.html
**Harmonize. Resonate. Communicate. Evolve.
--------------
theodorepong
11-21-2001, 04:41 PM
--- In asc2k@y..., "Brian V. Cox" <lerxst@m...> wrote:
>
> would the act of quantizing and analyzing your percent
> of relative STO be a STS act itself? by thinking "how
> can I increase MY STO to better help MY chances of
> positive polarity?"...vs just thinking "how can i help
> others along their paths and be of service?" and being
> of service without keeping "score" of how each act
> is polarizing you either way.
>
> just a thought...
>
> -brian
>
>
> > Regarding the measurement of S.T.S. and
> > S.T.O. orientation, I think that the reason
> > that we are attempting to measure them is
> > Ra's standard of being oriented to S.T.O. of
> > 51% or more, hence we're getting wrapped up
> > in trying to determine if we're reaching that
> > minimum standard.
> >
> > I agree with Rob: just relax and fly.
me too, for what it is worth.
it is a natural process. no measurement of is needed.
to attempt to alter your normal actions in anticipation of a reward of
ascension is defeating the purpose of sto behavior.
no need to keep a score card. ;)
>
> --------------
Tarzan
11-22-2001, 11:44 PM
<table>
><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2"><span class="620353807-23112001">Regarding the measurement ofS.T.S. and S.T.O. orientation, I think that the reason that we are attempting to measure them is Ra's standard of being oriented to S.T.O. of 51% or more, hence we're getting wrapped up in trying to determine if we're reaching that minimum standard.</span></font>
><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2"><span class="620353807-23112001"></span></font>
><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2"><span class="620353807-23112001">I agree with Rob: just relax and fly.</span></font>
><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2"><span class="620353807-23112001"></span></font>
><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2"><span class="620353807-23112001">Flying,</span></font>
><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2"><span class="620353807-23112001"></span></font>
><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2"><span class="620353807-23112001">Seth</span></font>
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.